Boter wrote:

The only teen-focused sci-fi show with three characters instead of five is VR Troopers, but that's not with mechs, sorry.

Oh, I remember that one, with its "amazing" effects. I was young, ok?

Also, "Big Bad Beetle Borgs." Any one remember that? It's ok if you don't, trust me.

There was a teen style science fiction show, some kind of mix between Mech Warrior and Star Trek with teens. Each mech had its own color style, with Red, Yellow and Green being the colors. Pretty sure the lead was a white male with black hair, with a black male and Asian female co-stars.

There is a scene where they find an alien goat, and an alien creature they meet says, after they lost it," That's too bad. Roasted thing is delicious."

It's driving me nut because I'm certain it was real but I don't think it made it past two episodes. Bear in mind, this was about 15 or 20 years ago, so I don't know if anyone remembers it, since I have an extremely weird ability to remember obscure details.

53

(346 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

https://i.imgur.com/Wfkm17R.jpg

So sexy. (Click to enlarge.)

Link.

Wow...just wow...

54

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Not sure if this follows but I'll try, with Star Wars and pop culture in general.

Because, I'm kind of over it. I still enjoy Star Wars, to be sure, and I still discuss the PT and find positives and negatives in them. I've become less biter towards them on the hold as I have aged. I won't call it "maturity" because-no. But, I've hit a point in my life were I like what I like, and appreciating things for just how they are.

But, I don't go out and try to consume pop culture any more. Even Star Wars, which I has a bin of figures to testify to my geekiness and still want to make a fan film some day, has lost a little glimmer. I just don't find it as engaging as I did.

I think my biggest frustration and the point were it crossed was with Star Trek and the constant emotional beatings on about "Not real Star Trek!" and fan films and the like. It's just draining because the culture has hit the point of constant outrage over small details and not enjoying things for anything.

So, I'd rather spend time enjoying things that I enjoy and sharing those experiences with others who also want to share them. I'm just kind of over the toxicity-it's too exhausting.

Not entirely spawned by your posts, guys, but some of my ramblings from an impromptu walk yesterday too.

55

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

James Franco is disturbingly good as Wiseau.

I'm just amazed that they got the rights to it.

Wow, Tom, I'm sorry for all that. Depression sucks, and that sounds like a rough way to go.
sad_tennant
Glad the Friends could help.

57

(108 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I would. There are some skills that my mom wanted me to learn (playing the piano, for instance) that I wish I had continued, among other things.

What's the most random, obscure, hobby that you would spend money on if you could?

58

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Writhyn wrote:

There's a similar discussion on the Noah DiF about watering (heh) down bible stories for children, which I agree with.

I've heard Christian comedians make similar points. Always interesting to me.

59

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

60

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

DarthPraxus wrote:

http://www.indiewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/mother.jpg

It's impossible to review this film without spoiling it. Suffice to say I've never seen another piece of art so full of seething, all-encompassing hatred. I am, as they say, shook.

Like The Witch, this is an extremely poweful, extremely disturbing film that a lot of people are gonna hate until twenty years from now when it becomes a classic.

went to your blog and hoped for a review because I was curious. Got an interesting discussion of Veggietales.

Surprisingly, as a Christian, I agree with you that the Bible needs to be handed down as it is. There are things that are completely terrible in that book, and the text doesn't water it down.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

61

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I personally found the first episode of Orville be pretty good. Not as funny as I thought, but it had a lot of heart, and very solid world building. I don't have enough experience with McFarlane's work I guess to have huge expectations, but I found his character to be interesting, quirky and funny. I guess I related or something.

The rest of the cast was solid, and none of them felt like "Oh, that's just this character from Star Trek" to me. It all felt very genuine.

62

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

MartyJ wrote:
Faldor wrote:

Episode 134 Blade Runner 2049

You're not losing anything by avoiding Independence Day: Resurgence; it really is quite awful. Emmerich had Jeff Goldblum & Brent Spiner and no idea how to use them.

On one of the DiF commentaries somebody quipped: "Shyamalan is on his way back!". It's no longer a joke after Split  tongue

Denis Villeneuve at the helm really gives me hope. Aside from The Martian (easily my favorite Mars movie nowadays), Ridley Scott's work hasn't been great lately (I'd rather wander through the desert for 40 years than watch Exodus again).

Just watch "The Ten Commandments" and be grateful you didn't have to work on that film.

63

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Faldor wrote:

I'm really enjoying ]Storybreak by Freddie Wong of that guy from youtube fame.

He, and a pair of writers sit down and break the story for a movie or TV show based on a famous IP. Sometimes this is a straight up attempt at the best way to adapt something, like Zelda into a new medium others they have more fun with it like Jar Jar: A Star Wars Story.

They even take films like Jumper and try and work out how it could be a better movie which reminded me a lot of another podcast I used to listen to...

Thank you for the suggestion. Been really looking for some more film podcasts to build off of my library of sound smile

64

(22 replies, posted in Episodes)

Saniss wrote:

The New-Yorker: I Watched “Die Hard” for the First Time

Interesting review, but ultimately a view of the film I strongly disagree with.

How does the elevator shaft scene make McClane superheroic? He almost dies here, and almost purely by chance manages to get a grip on a vent opening. The film makes a point of having McClane be resourceful, but human. He doesn't have a "spare, elemental power that disperses ludicrously when the police arrive". He gets things done while he can, but ends up out of his depth. Jeez, watch Die Hard 4 and you'll see a ridicously superheroic McClane.

I don't really like the second part about the pop-cultural references either. The author makes it sound like a completely commercial move and the product of a global wave of nostalgia. What if pop-cultural references are simply a way for the writers to ground their character in the real world? Make them a little bit less an entity of fiction and fantasy, but someone you can relate to more easily? The part about a common nostalgia for the fifties in the wake of the sixties is interesting, but I don't see how it applies to Die Hard. I don't like the underlying feeling of exploitation.

Last thing- the idea of a culture of violence and of violence as redemption. Die Hard is a violent film, there's no denying that. The way for the hero to move things forwards is to kill. But:

...it is only by means of his heroic effort to fight the terrorists that McClane saves his marriage, just as Al, through violence, saves his police-hood—in effect, his manhood.

I completely disagree. Violence is a side-effect arising from context. McClane doesn't save his marriage by shooting up bad guys. He saves it by coming incredibly close to death, which makes him reflect on his life and realize things. The bathroom scene, his lowest point - it's his moment of resolution. You don't see Holly hanging on to him like the original Star Wars poster, the damsel in distress who's looking up to the hero who just butchered a bunch of german thugs. They have a moment of crisis, fearing for their lives. Anybody will reflect on their life and put aside petty arguments in such moments, at least for a while. McClane and Holly are simply happy to be alive, and get a chance to work things out in a different state of mind from that moment on.
Al doesn't redeem himself by killing Kraut Jesus - again, context. He surpasses a fear, something that had been holding him back for years. It's a matter of self-confidence. Anyone here who has never experienced this? Didn't think so.

Anyway, thought I'd write these few words because this review challenged my view of Die Hard as a flawless and honest movie, but in the end, it remains unchanged and I think its author has a very biased look on it.

Thoughts?

My only real response on this is a general agreement, that violence is a byproduct, a result of consequences of choices, which is something that I actually find very refreshing in an action film. It doesn't feel like violence for the sake of it, but deliberate choices that are ramping up the stakes, that, honestly, John has little control over at first.

The other aspect is the fact that it isn't a redemption story-it's a story of vulnerability, perhaps symbolized best by John's bare feet.

I don't think its a perfect film, but I don't think it's the pure violence as that linked review discussed.

65

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

I'm very surpried by this information.

I honestly went in to it expecting it to be more of the same, very predictable story.

But, it actually creates a very large,epic feeling tale. It's editing could be a little tighter, but the story is so enjoyable that I only noticed a couple of parts that really took me out but then I was right back in.

It has the same fun and fantastical feel as the first, but a more epic feel, like it has a larger impact on the world its building.

Also, as established, I am a sucker for father-son scenes, and this has two...what, I didn't cry. I went to an old theater.

66

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"Pirates of the Carribean: Deadmen Tell No Tales AKA Salazar's Revenge."

I haven't seen the 4th one. When my brother asked me after we saw this movie if I understood all the references made, I explained them pretty simply, so apparently the fourth one wasn't required watching.

I need to do a full review of this, because there was so much about this movie to enjoy. I'll start off with the fact that this movie is pure fun with some great drama thrown in. It does something that I think very few films are willing to do now in their storytelling and this explore the consequences of what happens to the characters. In fact, I would say that Jack Sparrow is the poster child for contemporary film characters, as someone who actively tries to avoid consequences. And, in this instance, an act that he did when he was younger comes back to haunt him.

The story is a bit contrived, in that it tries to draw several characters and interconnect them in a way, but it flows very well once the characters are set up, and the plot points of getting the characters together are quickly moved past as the characters establish their relationships, and each person discovers some depth to the other that isn't expected, like Henry's reaction to Jack, Corina's reaction to Henry, and so on.

The film is very grand in scope and end goal, and it doesn't disappoint. It ties up plot points from the 3rd and 4th film in a way that was incredibly satisfying, and in ways I didn't expect. The main characters are all fairly well defined, and the film only drags because it has such a large supporting cast, and a subplot that doesn't go anywhere. But, other than that, this movie is an adventure, feels big and grand, and ends in the most satisfying way.

Highly recommend.

67

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

drewjmore wrote:

Yiddish for the win.

The subtitle to every Mel Brooks film.

68

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saniss wrote:
avatar wrote:

...and sheer chutzpah.

Dear diary,

Today I learned a new word.

It's not pronounced the way you think it is wink

So, "Rogue One" is on Netflix streaming in the USA, and someone pulled ye olde "Backstroke of the West" captioning. Click here for Star Wars: Grand Theft Auto.

70

(85 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Lot's of nice stuff at Comic-Con being revealed, including props, and some info on aliens. Avoid if you don't want spoilers, but the phasers are looking pretty cool, and the Klingons are getting a full set of armor.

71

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Tom, all I can say about Transformers is...I'm sorry.

Maybe an extended edition where you watch it and then Owen and Martin review it without watching and guess how the plot goes?

Kind of like Battleship was for FIYH?

72

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

I'm just gonna sit here and drool at this for a bit.

Looks ridiculous and amazing.

And, rewatch for the 3rd time.

73

(346 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Snail wrote:

My Saturn V Lego came today.  Here's the Facebook album...

And I have no words...or money.

Sweet!

74

(17 replies, posted in Creations)

Tomahawk wrote:

Also, bodies are easier if they're dead.

http://i.imgur.com/7ZYW0UZ.gif

https://i.imgur.com/nGbKGiM.jpg