1

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What We Do in the Shadows
Mad Max: Fury Road
It Follows
Ex Machina
Room
The Martian

As is the annual tradition, there are about a dozen films I meant to see, but still haven't made time for yet.

Can we get a John Boyega: Attack the Block/Force Awakens re-dubbing made? I'd love to see Finn spouting some of Moses' lines at BB8 and the gang.

Make it happen you video editing nerds!

Looks like I posted in the wrong thread before, so I'll move over here.

I left the theater really enjoying the movie. There were a handful of things that bothered me throughout but I had fun and it was definitely a serviceable addition to the story and universe.
My largest criticism is probably how derivative it was of the original trilogy.  At times it seemed like JJ was trying to make another reboot like he did with the 2009 Star Trek film.
Within the first thirty minutes we have what appears to be a Han Solo clone in Poe (brilliant pilot with an ego and sarcastic streak), a Kenobi clone in Tekka  (an old, robed white guy who sacrifices himself to the sith in front of the new jedi), a Luke clone in Rey  (wide-eyed, techie, jedi stuck on a backwoods desert planet), an Artoo clone in BB-8 (cute, unassuming Droid that speaks in boops and beeps and is given a macguffin crucial to the underdogs success) and A Vader clone in Kylo Ren (sith in all black with a mask and intimidatingly modulated voice).
I was pretty worried at first, but luckily most of these characters were given the chance to establish their own identities and in the case of Kylo Ren, may have intentionally been playing off our preconceived idea of what a sith is supposed to be. Ren may have been my favorite part of the film. His introduction on Jakku when he stopped the blaster bolt in mid-air really wowed me, I definitely hadn't seen anything like that before. He came off as dangerous, menacing and in total control. Yet as the movie progresses we see in reality he is young, unsure and a victim of his emotions. Truly a conflicted character with depth and room to grow.

I also really enjoyed Boyega's performance as Finn. He was instantly likable and provided a great protagonist for the audience to get behind. I only wonder how his character could exist given what little is revealed of his past. From the first time we see him it is clear he is unlike the other troopers. He appears sympathetic to fallen comrades, disobeys orders and generally seems to carry himself differently. From what I remember he said he was kidnapped by or sold to the First Order at a very young age and was trained since then to become a stormtrooper. One would assume that he underwent over a decade of brainwashing and training in that time. This can't be the first time he has questioned his role or the actions of the First Order. How has he survived so long in that environment while still being able to hold on to so much of his humanity?

I liked how they didn't treat Kylo Ren being Han and Leia's son as a major reveal or twist, rather it was simply dropped in earlier in the film. This really raised the stakes for Han when he went to blow up Deathstar 3.0 knowing he might run into his son and knowing he had to try and bring him back. I also think his death was handled pretty well (still don't know why all these bases require narrow catwalks with no guardrails over bottomless pits). For half a second you think Han might be able to talk his son out of what he's doing, at least just for a moment. Really felt bad for Chewie, I was just waiting for him to rip off stormtrooper limbs.

4

(0 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I recently watched the Fantasy/Horror/Adventure film, Tale of Tales (Il Racconto dei Racconti).

From what I gather it is an adaptation of three separate 17th century Italian fables. In setting and theme, they are reminiscent of the Grimms fairytales many of us are already familiar with and seem to be just as graphic and often disturbing as Grimms' before they received their Disney rewrites.

I have mixed feelings about the movie overall. Tale of Tales cuts between the three stories to form a single overarching story. However I don't feel like there is enough of a through-line to justify this, nor are any of the three stories quite strong enough to stand on their own. Many scenes throughout the film are memorable and visually haunting. There was certainly a great deal of talent involved in the crafting of these vignettes.

The cast was great for the most part and performance were mostly good, though perhaps a few takes managed to slip through due to the very multi-national nature of the production (I feel sometimes when non-native English speakers direct other non-native English speakers in English speaking productions they don't always recognize a bad line reading).

I don't want to spoil anything unless people want to get a discussion going. So I'll leave it at this.
I think the material makes for a better trailer than a cohesive movie. The whole thing felt a little unsatisfying and it's frustrating because it was clear how much work went into the product. The details and choices made in the film are interesting, but their inclusion only seemed to raise questions rather than be simply for the purpose of world building. This movie seems to be 90% on the way to being something great, but is perhaps lacking enough plot or story to make everything gel. For some strange reason visions of Mulholland Drive began surfacing while watching this movie. They both excel at making me feel slightly uncomfortable and left wondering if I missed something, or am too dumb to understand exactly what is happening. It's possible that the age of imdb trivia, easter eggs and wikipedia, has ruined our viewing culture by demanding every detail and production design choice have intrinsic meaning or hidden reinforcement of themes. 400 years ago when these stories were first being told, the writers didn't have to defend themselves or their choices to all of us neckbeards and fanboys. They could make a story about immaculately conceived albino twins and a giant flea just because they goddamn wanted to.

TL/DR: Tale of Tales is like a Guillermo Del Toro fever dream. It's worth watching, but don't expect it to make sense (then again, maybe it never was intended to make sense).

5

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

In a medium that is already oversaturated, do we really need another movie podcast? What about one that discusses the same movie every episode? What if they chose to discuss one of the most critically despised movies of the last decade?

Two comedians from New Zealand sat down and made a podcast in which they force themselves to watch the Adam Sandler cash grab, Grown Ups 2 every week for an entire year. After each viewing they record a <30 minute episode and discuss their feelings, conspiracy theories and deteriorating mental health brought on by each successive exposure.
The episodes range from venomous hate to the giddy appreciation of set dressings and extra work.

I'm about ten episodes into the show and I have to admit I'm hooked. The two have a great dynamic and are very entertaining even when discussing the same topic week after week. The longer it goes on the more I believe they are onto a seriously interesting social experiment.

Give it a listen if you're at the end of your podcast queue and you're looking for something new.

http://i.imgur.com/yjYE0ab.jpg

6

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Really enjoyed this doc. It reminded me of something Adam Savage would do.
Art meets science and technology.

7

(2 replies, posted in Off Topic)

When I first saw the trailers and synopses for this movie I thought, "boy does that look stupid". Then after the good reviews and friends' testimonials started rolling in I knew I must have been wrong.

I finally went and saw Jurassic World and couldn't help but think throughout the entire movie, "boy is this stupid".

Maybe it's a product of the hype train or I'm just being cynical, but I could not swallow the world this movie sets up.
I feel like 90% of my criticisms are nit picks, but after a while they tend to compound and eventualy my suspension of disbelief simply can't handle it.


> The fact that this park even exists after the events of the first three movies take place is a magic bean. As if people were flocking to board the Titanic 2 and Hindenburg Express within a few years of those disasters.

> Creating hybrid genetically altered super-dinosaurs because the public is bored with the tired old brontosaurus and t-rex? Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and people still visit them! We haven't had to make a croctopus or anything! People fucking love looking at animals and I won't believe looking at literal giants brought back from the dead will get old within a few seasons.

> Combining several animals' DNA into one organism and it developing latent super powers. That's not how genetics work.

> Giving the public acess to freely roam the grounds among the dinosaurs in a giant hamster ball? Do you known how stupid the general public is? I wouldn't trust theme park visitors to go in an exhibit like that withe domesticated cows. Someone will be playing American Gladiators with those animals on the first day I guarantee it.

> The scene where the raptors and super t-Rex sit down and have a fucking conversation?  Wat? They can both communicate through spoken word and happen to speak the same language?

> The way the park director and security handles the escaped dinosaurs? I know I'm biased because I'm a zookeeper and I work with big cats and bears every day, but any manager knows that guests literally being torn apart by your attractions is going to cost you more in ticket sales and PR cleanup than having to put down your expensive new pet.

> This jeep that has been sitting neglected and unserviced for a decade or so? What if some children pop a new battery in it? Done.

> The final showdown between the humans and raptors and t-Rex and super t-Rex was a little over the top, even for this movie.

Also the whole premise of Vincent Donofrio's character was pretty silly.

Like I said a bunch of nitpicks but I really thought this movie was on the level of the recent Fast and the Furious movies as far as how over the top, crazy the action scenes get. Those movies at least seem to be more aware and a little tongue in cheek as a result.


I did love the scene at the end with the guy from the New Girl and guard from Orange is the New Black.

8

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I completely forgot about Everything is Terrible, I'm sure I can make a supercut of all these things that will be sufficiently long and interesting.

Cheers.

9

(152 replies, posted in Episodes)

Goddamn, what a blindside.
I've been mostly a lurker in this community for about five years now. I've only posted a handful of times in the forum, but I've listened to damn near every episode of this podcast (many episodes several times over).

I don't know how tongue in cheek the moniker Friends in Your Head was when Teague suggested it, but he couldn't have been more spot on. Spending literally thousands of hours listening to a small group of people discuss, dissect, applaud or "fix" a movie every week has been such a gift. We all truly feel like we know you now and that's nobody's fault but your own. It's sad to see it come to an end, but thanks for letting us play a role in your passion and your lives.

I'll be sure to check back in regularly to see what all my Friends are up to.

So it goes . . .

10

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hey gang,

Hosting a party soon and I wanted some advice.
I was hoping someone might point me in the direction of some media I could throw on the tv to play during the party. It's going to be a casual, multi-room, indoor/outdoor affair and music will be playing so people will be coming and going through the room all night. I don't want to put on a full movie, just something with interesting visuals that awkward people can take a peak at in lulls of conversation.

I have seen great trailer/clip compilations on youtube, but they are generally only a few minutes long and I was hoping I could just play something that will run throughout the night. My fallback options will be Baraka, Samsara or a nature documentary.

This is along the lines of what I'm looking for:

Cheers!

11

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That song seems like such a strange choice. Loved it.

12

(1 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I've always thought Donald Glover was very clever in the way he turns a phrase and constructs his songs.
However I never could get fully into his previous albums. They all seemed too vainglorious and boastful (which I know is a mainstay in the majority of hiphop music, but it doesn't need to be).

It does nothing for me when he brags about how successful he became at a young age and how many girls he's slept with. Those topics are fine. I'm sure people like them, they just don't appeal to me. What bothers me is how much they clash with his serious songs, which come off as pity parties. I have a hard time sympathizing with someone for overcoming adversity and not connecting with people when 90 seconds before you were telling me how amazing you are and how great your life is.

Maybe I'm interpreting things incorrectly, I've only listened to his previous albums a couple times. As I said before, I think he's a really, really smart guy so I don't like to dismiss him prematurely.

13

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

From the Wachowski's:


If you ask me it looks like a hot mess. I'm eager to see it, but it looks overly complicated, hyper-stylized and convoluted. I guess that's kind of their bag now.

Jimmy B wrote:

Pegg plays Gary King, a total dickhead who is constantly trying to be a teenager again and in a reversal of the previous films . . .

I struggled through the beginning of the film for this reason. I think it may be my own bias though. I'm so used to Pegg playing a likeable character that it bothered me to see him playing an asshole.

Not as laugh-out-loud funny as the previous two collaborations, but still deserves its place among them.
For me the film really took off after the first 'turn' in the movie. Once those stakes were established, I began to have a lot more fun with the characters and the world.

The end didn't sit well with me the first time either. It didn't seem like a natural conclusion or to wrap things up as nicely as I would have hoped.

15

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

Age of Apocalypse is the X-men comics version of that inevitable episode of a TV show where the world is turned upside down and characters are essentially playing alternate versions of themselves.

http://imagecache5d.allposters.com/watermarker/51-5127-2MJEG00Z.jpg?ch=671&amp;cw=894
Lord I hope they don't do the Age of Apocalypse story. I remember thinking that was an ugly mess.


I'd prefer an Angel-->Archangel story.

16

(14 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

It was certainly a powerful film.

I agree some of the roles seem to have been the result of stunt casting. So many great actors in small roles that didn't necessarily lend themselves to a famous face. I can't blame an actor for wanting to participate in a film they feel strongly about or for working with a director they respect.
However I may question a casting department when the 'cavalcade' begins to become a distraction. Maybe time will lessen the degree to which this may affect an audience.

17

(11 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I know everyone loves saying it about nearly every adaptation, but if you have any interest in the ideas/plot of this story you really should read the books.

In response to some of the points you bring up:

  Show
I believe in the book Ender is supposed to be about half as old as his older siblings (I'm thinking Peter and Valentine are in their early teens and Ender is about six). So by the time Peter and Valentine were the ages Ender is at the beginning of our story, they could have been deemed unusable. They do have an interesting subplot in the novel dealing with politics and persuasion that really shows you brilliant all the Wiggin children really are.

Maybe the largest theme of Ender's Game is empathy. Over the course of the story it is revealed that the Formics have been trying to communicate with humans since first contact. Due to the differences in biology and culture, the two species were doomed to early misunderstandings, at least early on. Mazer Rackham was able to defeat the buggers because it was thought he was the only soldier who understood them. It's for this same reason that Ender is heralded as the greatest chance to defeat the buggers, because he is so empathetic.

"The moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him"

So what makes Ender the perfect soldier also makes him the most receptive to the buggers' communication. That being said, the buggers cannot directly communicate with Ender like they can with each other so they use the fantasy game as a medium. Ender is simply the only one who is able to latch onto it. Anderson and Graff are just as confused as to how the program is able to pull personal images from Ender's mind into the game.

As for the big reveal. One of the hardest part of adapting a book like this into a film is that so much of the story takes place in Ender's head. In the movie we never really get a clear understanding of how complex, sympathetic and exhausted the mind of this child is. The teachers at battle school grind him down and deprive him of sleep, comfort and friends and are constantly stacking the deck against him (like for years). This forces Ender to constantly rework his strategies, and stretch himself to his limits to the point of desperation. He hates himself every time he resorts to violence as it is a reminder of Peter and the thought of becoming like him is terrifying. Yet he can't completely divorce himself from the idea that violence is always avoidable.

I don't remember how early the movie reveals the fact that the IF has been dispatched to counter-attack the buggers. If I recall correctly, Ender believes he will be commanding a defensive army or one that is put into place to protect earth from future bugger invasions. Not an army that is launching its own invasion. So he believes he is playing what is basically a series of incredibly complex games of chess designed by Mazer Rackham to test his resolve and adaptability.

Anyway, I hope I didn't spoil too much and you'll still check out the series. My favorite is still Speaker for the Dead, which is the direct sequel and deals with the ramifications and aftermath of the events of Ender's Game.

18

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Olly Moss has to be my favorite movie poster artist. I'm not sure if he's made any 'official' ones, but he's fairly well known for his alternative posters. I think the Alamo Draft House may have commissioned a series from him.

It's really difficult for me to choose one, he has so many brilliant, minimalistic designs.
I might have to go with his take on Dirty Harry:

http://i.imgur.com/mn1DKQ9.jpg


His There Will Be Blood, American Werewolf in London, Four Lions, Star Wars Trilogy, and Studio Ghibli pieces are also excellent.

http://ollymoss.com/

19

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

They chose some good properties to work with. Those characters can easily exist in the 'real world' and won't rely too heavily on special effects to make a decent action/crime series.

I am a little surprised they included Daredevil though. He's more of a major character and with the rights reverting back to Marvel I'd have thought they'd take a chance with another feature-length film.

20

(11 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I also took note of the Digital Domain company card. Is that a first for an effects house, or have they branched out into the production business as well?

21

(11 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Apologies if there is already a thread going, a quick search did not reveal one though.

Just saw Ender's Game last night and I don't want to write a full review, but I thought I'd give my quick impression and get a discussion going.

I should qualify myself by stating I really enjoy what I've read from the Ender series. I was introduced to Ender's Game back in high school and since then I've also read Speaker for the Dead (favorite), Xenocide and Ender's Shadow.


I left the theater feeling much like I did after leaving the Hunger Games.
I thought, "that was a fine, unoffensive, safe movie that I'm sure many young adults will enjoy".
I didn't have any huge complaints, but plenty of quibbles and nitpicks.

Spoilers Ahead

My major grievance was probably the pacing. Battle school felt completely rushed and clunky. The amount of time Ender spent there seemed to be pared down from several years to less than a couple months. I understand that time is never on your side when you adapt a beloved book full of great scenes and interesting characters, and that means leaving a lot on the cutting room floor. However, even something as simple as a montage or two showing Ender's training, studying and experimenting may have better conveyed the depth of his genius and empathy. The character moments they did include felt a bit forced. I feel they overplayed Petra and Ender's relationship, when really it was Bean that seemed more important to me in the novel (actually I'm amazed the studio didn't force Hood to include a zero-g kissing scene with those two children).

The fantasy game was fine, again seemed rushed, but I have no idea how else they could have handled it.
I thought the film really picked up in the third act, at command school. I thought the visuals of the 'simulations' looked great and I enjoyed watching Asa command as the great Ender Wiggin.

Kingsley had a good performance as Mazer Rackham (didn't seem to be phoning it in as much as Ford). The final twist felt a little predictable with how some of the simulations beforehand and conversations among the brass were portrayed. This may be because I already knew the reveal though.

I'm sure I have a lot more to say, but I'd like to hear what you all thought as well. Overall I think it was fine, I'd give it a 6/10.

22

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's impossible for me to divorce myself from all of the books, so my opinion is biased.

For me though, the HBO series is the definition of spectacle.

It's not often that ADULTS are treated to a sprawling epic filled with kings and bastards, skinchangers and assassins, swords and armor, dragons and giants. All set on the backdrop of frozen tundras, seas of grass, endless deserts, rocky coasts and heaving cities.
GoT delivers all of these things, and they aren't even what makes the series great. It's the relationships between the characters, their arcs and motivations, desires and beliefs. It's their honor, their lust, their religious fundamentalism and bitter skepticism that makes the story great. The draw for me is the politics, power struggles, alliances and betrayals (so many betrayals). I want to know what happens to these characters and their kingdoms and it's not often that I have no idea how things will end and who among them will make it long enough to find out.

23

(0 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i.imgur.com/2fphntO.jpg

What do all you screenwriters think of this infographic?
Obviously there is some tongue-in-cheekiness to it, but I like the simplicity behind it.

24

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

  • Stop Podcasting Yourself

  • Comedy Bang Bang

  • How Did This Get Made

  • Boars, Gore and Swords

  • Star Talk Radio

  • Doug Loves Movies

And really anything with Paul F Tompkins in it.

25

(3 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-v … mon-393459


He's being joined by Simon Kinberg who has a mixed bag of credits including the first Guy Ritchie Sherlock Holmes movie, Mr. and Mrs. Smith and the new X-Men: Days of Future Past movie.