Marty J wrote:Just like Kubrick and Lynch, Nolan has a very specific style. I think it works pretty well for the movies he made so far, but not all movies should be like that.
You're conflating style with substance here. Nolan has a very particular style and a very particular absence of substance. DARK KNIGHT works as well as it does because of the Joker. Not only is he entrancing to watch, but he represents a force of chaos opposing order (represented by Batman) in a battle for the soul of Gotham (represented by Dent). There's actual themes and shit going on here. Given the rest of Nolan's work I almost feel like this was a lucky accident. He just does such a good job of making his every film a ride that a lot of people -- myself included, I'll admit -- don't really care. But, ask me what his best film is, and I'll say DARK KNIGHT hands down, and that's why.
You know ultimately, this is the same problem with AVATAR, and why it was so disappointing. AVATAR started with the worldbuilding and put so much effort into it, had this whole world of imagination and style, and then once that was all in place laid it over the least imaginative structure imaginable, just a totally generic hero's journey as an excuse to show the pretty pictures, and it didn't make for a good enough ride -- for my money -- to be forgivable.
I mean, Cameron admits that he only wrote the thing as a way to force the hand of computer graphics and advance that side of things, so it's not all that surprising, but I think the frustration was in knowing that Cameron is capable of being just as imaginative in his storytelling as he is in his visuals.
Having had some years to get over the initial shock, AVATAR isn't "incompetent," it's just clearly not applying itself. But the thing is, nobody really talks about it anymore, because the initial thrill of the visuals has worn off and there's nothing really to connect to underneath. It was supposed to be the next STAR WARS, but Jake isn't Luke, Neytiri isn't Leia, nobody is even trying to be Han, and everybody's Chewie. And we saw how that went for the Holiday Special.
So AVATAR is particularly interesting because I think both sides of the reaction have kind of walked it back and both find themselves with just tepid feelings about it, if they remember it at all.
My walking-back usually happens within the first 24 hours after watching a film. I'll come out thrilled in the afterglow of a film only for the fridge logic to tear it all down (e.g. most Abrams); or I'll come out meh but then mull it over and realize the movie was doing a lot of stuff that I didn't notice as it was going -- fridge genius? -- and decide I actually love it now that I'm on the same page (e.g. most Aronofsky).