Doctor Submarine wrote:Boter wrote:I enjoy both (generally CinemaSins more than Honest Trailers but that's not meant to take away from HT at all, just personal preference). They poke fun and frankly if someone think they're supposed to be serious then joke's on them.
The most serious I've taken a CinemaSins episode as a form of criticism was, "Wow, Jurassic Park only had 37, that's crazy low."
It really really really doesn't matter whether or not they're supposed to be serious. The "issues" they raise aren't invented, and the presentation of these "plot holes" as "sins" is a destructive attitude when it comes to film (or any art, really). And even if it were all just a joke, people take it seriously. So I couldn't give less of a shit what the creators of these videos think they're doing, though I doubt they're any smarter than these videos make them out to be. People watch these videos and think, "Yeah, that's the right way to look at film." And it's appealing because, unlike a lot of art criticism, it resembles "analysis" without actually requiring any thought to come up with.
If you enjoy them, please understand that I'm not insulting your or your taste or anything like that. I'm confident that everyone on this forum is smart enough not to take these videos seriously. But I'm not confident that the rest of their viewers are.
Well, it is nice to know that I am not being insulted
For me, it is fun. Pure and simple. I don't take it as film criticism, because it is not. It is hyperbole, exaggerating both the film's faults and their responses for the sake of (subjective) comedic effect. SF Debris will do similar jokes, but that isn't the whole joke, and offers more analysis.
CinemaSins, for what it is worth, also focus on plot holes that have generally bothered the panelists here too. Aspects of Prometheus, Transformers, Chronicles of Riddick, all have points made about them that I have heard on this show.
I don't know. But, like most comedy, should it really be taken so seriously?
God loves you!