So, episode 2. A significant improvement from last week, as we go from 'bewilderingly awful' to 'not very good'. If the present trend continues, who knows what heights we might scale?
Peter Capaldi is still very good to excellent, though perhaps slightly let down by the aspects of the script. Sure, it's supposed to be new regeneration and blah blah blah, but I think it's in the Thor commentary where the guys talk about drafts that just have the first thing you thought of for a line or a joke or whatever, and you then come back later to fix those. Except if feels in places like they just never did that.
But the big problem though is still the story.
In the writer's guide for the original Star Trek, one of the things that Gene Roddenberry is at pains to emphasize is that science fiction doesn't have its own dramatic rules. In principle, any story for Star Trek should be 'translatable' into something that would work in a police procedural, a hospital show, a legal show, etc. and be dramatically satisfying. And that just doesn't happen in this episode. You can hang all the lanterns on it you want, which they do (and I think this episode must have needed a dedicated gaffer just for that), but that doesn't make it better.
SPOILER
ShowAcknowledging that the concept is just a ripoff of Fantastic Voyage doesn't make it any less lazy. And Clara complaining about being asked to just "do something clever" doesn't alter the fact that nothing that she does or that happens makes any sense. "Hey, maybe this panel connects to something. Wow, and pushing this button that sends memories (which doesn't otherwise seem to be stopping the Dalek) makes the 'Dalek antibodies' stop attacking us." I think if they'd just had Wesley invert the phase polarity it would have worked a lot better.
And what's kind of frustrating is that, just last week's episode actually, it seems like there's the core of a good idea here:
SPOILER
Showthe idea of a 'good' Dalek, and the idea that life always wins out in the end over extermination, and how that possibly relates to the Doctor's character, particularly given (relatively) recent events
But it's all just so half-assedly executed -- as if it was enough just to have the idea, rather than then needing to embed that idea in a decent story and script.
And even at 40 minutes the episode feels padded, though it's not as bad as last week.
SPOILER
ShowHowever much time is taken up by the various shipboard battle sequences, it feels like too much, since they don't do anything, and none of these characters are well drawn enough to be that invested in whatever this vague rebellion is. And it's not helped by the fact that we've got all this heavy-handed 'arc' stuff (OK, geez, I get it. Mr Pink is one of these rebellion guys.). Plus the fact that Clara's not traveling with the Doctor means that we have to waste time going back to pick her up, and then drop her off again.
I see from Wikipedia that starting with episode 7 we're getting a run of episodes by people who seem never to have written for Doctor Who before. I'm quietly hopeful that maybe, with a little luck, those might possibly be 'meh'.
For the next hour, everything in this post is strictly based on the available facts.