226

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

Good point about the opening text info-dump, totally unnecessary. It's interesting to contrast with the opening info-dump of Oblivion, which at least is justifiable in that movie because

SPOILER Show
it's all bullshit that the character giving the exposition has been told, so it's a decent way to misdirect the audience for awhile since we usually take the opening exposition as truth.

227

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

Also, I'm not saying the code itself has to be accurate, because you're right that you won't spot that stuff in the moment (usually, though I was ecstatic to see proper shell commands being used in Social Network). The bigger question is the design/look of that stuff, which tends to be over-engineered graphical bullshit flying all over the screen, which bears no resemblance to actual coding (Skyfall is the most recent culprit of this crap).

Just toning that stuff down, or making something visually believable, goes a long way.

You mention the Matrix, and while the vertically scrolling matrix character stuff makes no sense, the way it's presented visually is simple and consistent enough that you can buy that this is just how the machine-engineered code works, and that the human operators have gotten good enough at looking at it that they can pick up on what's going on. It also doesn't hurt that the "in-world" hacking we see Trinity doing in those movies is actually pretty believable too. Wachowski's did their homework.

228

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

I disagree strongly. Movies are generally trying to build a believable world to suck you into the narrative. Having stupid nonsensical computer interfaces and code scrolling by totally pulls you out of the narrative every time (and more and more people increasingly know how to code).

That's one of the great things about David Fincher, he takes the time to make sure his technical details are accurate, and Social Network and Girl With the Dragon Tattoo benefit from completely accurate and believable coding.

229

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Seriously Karen Gillan looks awesome in this http://bitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/karen-gillan-GOTG-1.jpg

230

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:

Star-Lord is Jack Sparrow from the first Pirates movie, the guy who desperately wants to be notorious.

Except that guy ain't no Johnny Depp.  I'm good with the wacky premise and tone.  Except for that lead, who doesn't bring much to the party.   More and more movies seem to be casting abs, not actors.   

That's a role that requires "Nathan Fillion, but younger" to make work.  From what we're shown here, new guy isn't bringing it.

John C Reilly is absolutely brutal too, that dialogue and that delivery just sucks. I'm all for a rip-roaring light-hearted space adventure-comedy, but that footage feels closer to a parody youtube short than a real movie. Not digging the lighting/sets either. Again, it might be them just holding stuff back, but I ain't feeling it right now.

231

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Didn't even realize that was Karen Gillen as crazy blue alien chick, pretty solid makeup work

232

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Does nothing for me. My vibe on this has been that it'll either be a total disaster, or an amazing cult masterpiece. After that trailer, I'm leaning hard towards the former. Not funny, weird, but in a way that seems more stupid than clever. It feels like they don't have a grasp on what the tone of this should be at all.

Could just be a bad trailer, but I ain't feeling it.

Deus Ex is already being adapted into a movie as we speak, and the writer has talked openly about the similarities to Robocop, and how Deus Ex deals with a very different set off themes. I do think that adaptation has the chance to be very successful in movie form.

234

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

With all our love for the original Robocop in the other thread, it might be cool to do a Robocop 1/2 double-feature episode at some point, given that Trey worked on the 2nd one.

235

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:

Gotta say, the most disappointing thing about the show at this point is the case itself. It started out intriguing, but the stuff with the biker gang in the most recent episode felt so recycled.

hahahahaha never mind.

Yep, the case genuinely seems awesome now, I can't wait to see where it goes now.

Also, I'm now obsessed with the credits song from ep 5:

Ya, that clip makes me want to vomit. This videogame cutscene bullshit is a plague on modern cinema. Ugh.

237

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, their choices for this season kinda baffle me. This show is bizarre in the sense that it's so well-made in every department that it kinda tricks you into going along with it and thinking it's good, when in fact it's just spinning it's wheels. Lots of cringe-worthy stuff this season, and the comment about it being a Soap Opera is so right. It's just not very good.

All of Season 2 spoilers:

SPOILER Show
I was super excited going into the season thinking season 1 was him pulling all this crazy stuff off to engineer himself into the vice-presidency, and then this season would be everything falling apart as the reporting trio working together take him down, following the trail of clues and fighting with him. That seemed like a perfect way to do the show in 2 seasons. Instead, they completely undo and remove every cool supporting character they've established. Zoe dies in a cheap shocking move early on that makes 0 sense in terms of believability, the reporter gets jailed and loses by the half-way mark, Jeanine gives up and leaves. Christina literally is written out of the show in a throwaway line of dialogue (btw Claire, I fired her as you suggested). And this time, there's no morally decent person to root for, the way you had Peter Russo last season.

This all screams to me of unnecessary story padding. They wanted one more season of Underwood being a badass and getting EVEN MORE power, so they could then do a season 3 where he starts getting taken down. And as a result they end up throwing out all the good stuff they were setting up in season 1 just to allow things to drag on.

238

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I strongly disagree so far. The show has been strong for being super grounded for the most part up to this point.

SPOILER Show
The murder in this episode is a great wtf moment for the audience, but totally shatters the believability of this series, and plays like something out of 24 or a far goofier show. I don't buy for a second that Underwood personally kills someone in that public of a fashion. It feels contrived as all hell, there would be a million cameras around, and someone as public as him would never risk it (like that disguise is fooling anyone). It's total bullshit frankly, and the susbsequent episode starting to delve into the "darknet" feels like something out a 90s hacker movie and doesn't belong in this show.

Kinda disappointed so far.

239

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

By the way, I love that the show is explicitly setup to be 1 eight-hour story. We know this will be a complete story without having to pad things out for future seasons. It gets the benefit of the extended TV runtime, without all the negatives that usually implies compared with feature films.

It also opens the possibility for lots of unique things for other seasons. Like, for Season 2, they could do a complete 180 and follow a pair of detectives working in some foreign country, like Russia, and see how utterly different procedure is there.

240

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The helicopter shots of cars driving along desolate roads in this show are jaw-dropping

241

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Also holy shit, apparently it was a true single take, no CG splices at all  0_0

242

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It is unreal. Easily the best non-cg tracking shot since Children of Men. One of the best things I've ever seen pulled off on TV

243

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Off the top of my head, I would say Children of Men, Dredd, maybe Social Network?

244

(121 replies, posted in Episodes)

Ya, it's like the scenes with the bad guys are from a Paul Verhoeven heightened satire like Total Recall (except lame and much less fun to watch) , and the rest of the movie is trying to be Blade Runner or Children of Men.
Doesn't work at all.

I'd still forgive that if there was a single memorable action sequence. Dredd had 1/3 the budget and delivered on everything this movie fails at.

I'll say this, Signs scared the ever-loving shit out of me when I saw it as a kid. I was going through a serious UFO phase at the time, and that 1st viewing is still probably the most scared I've ever been by a movie. That rooftop Silhouette shot made me jump several feet out of my seat. Only stuff that's come close since then is Rec and The Descent.

Haven't gone back to it because I think all the religious stuff would just piss me off nowadays, and a lot of the stuff with the Aliens is deeply stupid if you think about it now. That being said, there's a lot of really effective filmmaking on display. The kitchen pantry, the scene with the radios, the found-footage birthday party.
It's hard to believe the same guy who pulled off such amazing stuff went on to make Last Airbender.

246

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The cinematography on this show is fucking amazing. Looks as good as or better than anything I've seen theatrically released in the last year. So many amazing shots.

247

(121 replies, posted in Episodes)

Abrams is a terrible action director. Shaky-cam all over the place, bad use of geography, and the guy refuses to give you master shots for the space stuff. It kinda bugged me in Star Trek 09, and really pissed me off in STID.

Possible, though not likely. More likely is that he goes back to this script and makes it AFTER whatever his next movie ends up being.

It's particularly a bummer cause good Westerns almost never get made anymore, and this could've been a great one. Pretty much no one except Tarantino has the clout to get a Spaghetti Western made in 2014.

It's a bummer cause it sounded like an awesome project and it was all set to go. Who knows when he'll be done writing the next one, and when THAT one goes into production?

250

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

The level of work that they put in to Forward Unto Dawn was pretty amazing, given the whole thing was a giant promo for Halo 4.

However, I thought the project was well done and makes me wonder what is holding up the Halo movie.

Probably the fact that the moment Master Chief shows up on screen in that movie, it instantly falls apart and looks like a huge joke. That costume on screen looks like a cosplay kid from a video-game convention just walked through the door, instantly loses whatever reality or believability they've been trying to set up.

All studio/Microsoft politics aside, that's why no-one's figured out how to make a Halo movie. If it was just about normal space marines, they could just write whatever character and make it work, but Master Chief is the center-piece of that franchise, and is one of the worst protagonists in any media-form. Looks dumb, has no personality (practically no dialogue), and you never see his face.

Dredd would probably be the closest model to follow, but at least Dredd has a chin to emote with.