I'd rather a good sequel/reboot than a shitty "original" film.
Another 15 Marvel sequels coming up... Iron Man 6, Thor 4, Captain America 5, Avengers 7, Whatever 3
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by avatar
I'd rather a good sequel/reboot than a shitty "original" film.
Another 15 Marvel sequels coming up... Iron Man 6, Thor 4, Captain America 5, Avengers 7, Whatever 3
Oh wait, today is one of the days where we're taking Rotten Tomatoes reviews on blind faith??
Shit, my schedule must've gotten mixed up, according to mine today we're supposed to be Damning them for not being able to see the obvious greatness of that thing we all love. And then NEXT week using Rotten Tomatoes as the ultimate bible for what a movies worth without ever seeing it.
Sorry, sorry, my bad.
One shouldn't take any opinion on faith. But Rotten Tomatoes isn't an opinion, it's an aggregate of all opinions that usually gives a reasonably reliable forewarning of a movie's worth. The more opinions that are aggregated, the better.
Movies with <20% RT scores tend to suck, and movies >80% tend to be okay. Yes, there's probably the odd exception, but overall, it's ONE factor that contributes to a decision to spend one's $20. If I was sitting on the fence, a very high or very low score can tip it one way or the other.
Over the last 3-4 years, I've noticed that big-name A-list projects tend to get over-generous RT scores, so I tend to take 10-20% off a Martin Scorsese or Ridley Scott production.
For mediocre movies that cluster in the middle 40-60% range, you have to use other factors to decide. But if a score is universally very high or very low, that's pretty reliable in my experience.
Transcendence WTF? 18% Rotten Tomatoes.
This was supposed to be the first decent movie of 2014. We all knew Robocop, Hercules, I Frankenstein, and Pompeii were going to be schlock, but who would have thought this project, with its A-list cast & production team would drop the ball.
Has anyone seen it? What was its sin? I was going to see it, but scathing reviews turned me off.
2014 hopes now down to just Godzilla and Interstellar.
The BBC did a pretty decent television movie about the fall of Lehman Brothers...
The "George-Lucas-ification" of LOTR. I wouldn't go that far as PJ hasn't dicked around with the original trilogy. The Hobbit movies are still more watchable than those Prequel movies... just.
The two Marathons, obviously. (Marathons rock)
Watchmen, Poltergeist, V for Vendetta, Terminator series, Alien series, are all great commentaries. There's dozens of superb ones - too many to list.
but as a basic rule...
Trey & Dorkman lov'n it (e.g. Dredd).
Trey & Dorkman hate'n it (e.g. Prometheus).
Any of the team having worked on something. (e.g. The Abyss) - More of Trey's back-catalogue.
As someone who's done a lot of 'history of science' tourism in London, the third episode was great
For DUNE fans in England... here's an event with Alejandro Jodorowsky at the British Library including a screening of the new documentary of the unmade DUNE film....
Dorkman wrote:Frankly I think the Catholic Church should just roll with the popular definition because the real one makes no sense.
So Jesus was immaculately conceived without sin AND born of a virgin? Nobody would believe that!
However, note that some branches believe that Mary miraculously REMAINED a virgin her whole life.
Talking about Virgin Births...
Shmi Skywalker: There was no father. I carried him, I gave birth, I raised him. I can't explain what happened.
Calling all science nerds.
What do you think of Neil deGrasse Tyson's new COSMOS series?
How's it compare to Carl Sagan's original?
I've seen the first two episodes, and it's not bad. I thought it might be like the History Channel / Discovery Channel / National Geographic channel shit that passes for factual content, but Cosmos is classy, restrained, and a treat to look at. [Americans, why are there so many crap documentaries on H2, etc?)
The evolution episode was somewhat defensive (engaging with all the Christian nutjob arguments) but that was to be expected.
And they resisted the temptation to endless repeat the meteorite that killed the dinosaurs. In fact, they didn't show it at all in the section on extinctions. Nor spectacle on what life looked like in Titan's lakes.
The DNA animations were a bit 'sparkly-glowy', but well done. The theme music is non-distinct (the original Cosmos had a great soundtrack). The historical animation of Bruno in the first episode was a surprising in-your-face to the Catholic Church.
The Titan sequence looked great.
I wrote to Neil deGrasse Tyson about 2 years ago urging him to resist the producers' pressure at Fox to dumb it down, and he was nice enough to write back and assure all that they had free reign. Must be Seth's influence.
Good to see some call-backs to Carl Sagan's original series occasionally too.
Looking forward to more episodes. Not that science nerds will actually learn anything new, but it's nice to see it all packaged in a glossy well-produced way. The roll out to 170 countries is amazing distribution. I wonder which countries ARE NOT getting it.
Nothing explained. Inconsistent (is she a fish out of water? She seems to know just what she's doing). Last half is suddenly shot on video - looks cheap. Lots of padding. Shots go on far too long of boring Scotland life. Drab landscape. You keep waiting for something to happen, something to be explained.
No real redeeming features. Score sounds like nails on chalkboard.
Three sequences are striking, but are left unresolved, raising more questions than answers.
The gimmick is that Scarlet drove around with a wig and talked to strangers while the director secretly filmed it. While that may have been hilarious for the crew at the time, the joke doesn't translate to the audience. So what?
In the end, it's just another sub-category of the "Vampire" genre with nothing new to add to all the tropes. It doesn't have the budget to add anything new even if it wanted to.
A cheap-looking Species crossed with Let the Right One In with the look and feel and tone of Inland Empire.
3/10
Saw 300 - Rise of an Empire
* Lead is a Sam Worthington clone, right down to the lack of any charisma.
* Just a 5 minute sequence about what they're fighting for (achievements of Athens as laying the foundations of western civilization) would have been good. Zilch. No mention of Greek theatre, science, philosophy, Olympics, art, history, literature, etc.
* Speed-ramping cranked up to 11. Everyone sprayed with cartoon blood
* Opening sequence for the 490BC Battle of Marathon looked cool, but then the battles just went on and on until it was numbing.
* Many cast members from 300 return. More than you'd expect. Events play out parallel to Thermopylae.
* Most fascist movie since Leni Riefenstahl. Glorification of militarism.
* Couple of good score cues
* Set your expectations low - deserves its middling Rotten Tomatoes score.
In many western countries, the youth doesn't have the free disposable income they used to have a generation ago (falling real wages, student loans, higher unemployment). I wonder if the torch is going to be passed more from west to east. We're already seeing many tentpoles set a scene or two in China.
Perhaps in 50 years, all the big franchises we know will have Asian cast members.
Here's how I always saw the "time travel" thing:
It seems like the day resetting, but really he's just jumping timelines. Every morning, he jumps to a new timeline, which he can change as he wishes. When the day is over, he disappears from that timeline. Or if he dies, he dies. Eventually he does the right thing, and he gets to stay in that timeline.
It's quite simple. In an infinite universe all possible variations of matter exist. If my calculations are correct, you just have to align the phase transitions with the output of the quantum vortex generator after computing the hyper-spatial inter-dimensional manifold flux, then integrating for the supersymmetric field lines, being careful to avoid the propensity for asymptotic singularities to form between collapsed membranes.
Oh, the Dinobots...
KayRule wrote:Nice to see Godzilla fucking up Las Vegas.
That wouldn't have happened if the Mafia was still in charge.
Joe Pesci v Godzilla (Unrated Edition)
With all our love for the original Robocop in the other thread, it might be cool to do a Robocop 1/2 double-feature episode at some point, given that Trey worked on the 2nd one.
The London chapter of the FIYH WAYDM Appreciation Society seconds the motion.
Trailer is... acceptable, but that's only the first hurdle. Second hurdle: rotten tomatoes score needs to be over 80%. Only then will I allow Godzilla to kindly take my money.
Cruise stopped him right away saying "I don't do stairs, it's not a good look for me".
One doesn't tackle stairs until one has passed Operating Thetan Level #15. Every Clear knows that by their third audit.
Most snubbed movie of 2013: Cinematography, Score, and VFX.
Lots of similarities with Elysium:
Similar budgets: ($120M for Oblivion, $115M for Elysium).
Both made $286M at the international box office.
Both directors have only done one movie before.
Both have solid production design.
Both starred an A-lister that...
avatar wrote:I'd add another qualification to the "Perfect Movie" - one that it would be sacrilegious to remake. If it were announced that classics like Terminator 1&2, Alien & Aliens, Star Wars OT, BTTF, LOTR, Indiana Jones were going to be remade, the backlash would be palpable.
They're rebooting TERMINATOR.
It's surely not going to repeat the same story as Terminator (in the way that Robocop and Total Recall were 'repeat- remakes'), but a prequel or new chapter in the existing universe? I don't know - do they even have a script?
I'd add another qualification to the "Perfect Movie" - one that it would be sacrilegious to remake. If it were announced that classics like Terminator 1&2, Alien & Aliens, Star Wars OT, BTTF, LOTR, Indiana Jones were going to be remade, the backlash would be palpable. No one cares that much if yet another Hulk movie were churned out or Green Lantern was rebooted.
After the trailer showed Matt in a mech suit and the inevitable enhanced superhero v supervillain punch-up plot, my expectations were dialled down. Consequently the movie didn't suck hard for me.
...tho, I'm still wondering:
Did we really hear different things/recordings...
...or did we hear the same thing and interpret it differently?
I've heard people thinking she was going for a South African accent.... whatever it was it was odd.... and I'm wondering how much my memory is playing tricks on me. I may need to buy the Blurry to check....
/Z
If you look closely, Jodie Foster is wearing a DUG collar...
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by avatar
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.