3,401

(21 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ohhhhhhhhh, hey. This might explain the title sequence.

I think that the modernity, the thing that made it a new take on the locked room mystery, was not the foundation of socialism on the Third Reich war profiteering... That's perfectly good and that's perfectly understandable, but that's what [author] Stieg Larsson was about and what he was up in arms about. He certainly was talking about the dark black liquid underbelly of this other... Sweden is still - I still saw it on the list the other day of the top 10 countries for women to live in. It was number three or something. And yet, Larsson would say, and there are many, many reports that would say to you, there's a disproportionately high rate of rape in this country.

-Fincher

From this.

3,402

(80 replies, posted in Episodes)

Hahahahahahahahaha! Sucker!

No, yeah, we were. :-P

3,403

(4 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"I'd as soon destroy a stained glass window as a swordsman like yourself. But, since I can't have you following me, either..."

- The Earth

Drew, I am so sorry about that. You are retroactively invited like a motherfucker, sorry it's too late. Also, apparently Brian was in Chicago at the same time we were at Jim's.

This has been a failure of a summit.

3,405

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

Happy new year, too. That's exciting. I'd make a joke about how we're all gonna die this year, but Brian would be mad and make me watch Neil DeGrasse Tyson videos.

Zarban is a great guy. (It's still hard for me to not-call-him Zarban, even knowing his name.) Exactly what I expected personality-wise - smart, conscientious, witty - plus he has the world's coolest office / home theater. Recorded a special Intermission with him, Holden, and Jim, just talking about DIF and the community and random stuff that nobody but forum folk would be too interested in.

3,407

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

HOLY SHIT I"M STILL LOGGED IN AS TEAGUE!!

WHOO HOO! POWER RUSH!

/absolute power corrupting absolutely

=====
This was posted by Zarban

EDIT: So the Intermission episode links to here now.

So me, Holden, Cloe, iJim and Zarban are hanging out.

Zarban and Jim conspired to make us cookies.

Also, things!

3,409

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That was amazing. Holy shit.

3,410

(80 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'd be very interested to hear you devote a big post to BTTF 2, if you have some time. Give a premise for your opinion, outline it with some examples, etc..

It's the holidays, so if you don't have the inclination, no big. I'd just like to hear an opposing viewpoint.

3,411

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, and you could smell it. Sort of like Douglas Adams gave his "blessing" on some incomplete ideas on the HHGTTG movie, and those parts felt really undercooked, same here. It lacked a bit of confidence in the taking-its-time department, like someone wasn't sure this is the kind of thing Mike would have liked.

I'm still in awe of Michael Crichton, generally. For the same reason you've got to hand it to the Red Hot Chili Peppers; I'm not a huge fan, but you have to admit, having a few hit singles per album for twenty straight years isn't a fluke.

3,412

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

ITT we discuss Michael Crichton, as brought up by Gregory in the Jurassic Park thread. Reproduced here:

Anyone else reading the new Crichton book "Micro"? It's essentially "Honey I Shrunk The Scientists", but it's an interesting concept that I'd love to see get filmed. It's kind of impressive that Crichton's ideas got harder and harder to film as time went on, as Micro coud only be done on a budget of about $150 million to be done right, and only with today's technology, but Jurassic Park could be filmed in '92 for about $60.

Spoilers for "Micro" until the red text below. And they're not really super spoilers, it's just me saying what Crichton always seems to do in his books, and it does apply in the case of Micro.

Michael Crichton was getting more and more predictable, for the most part, with every book. Here's the plot for the new Michael Crichton book - not "Micro," or "Prey," or the one about the humanzee, or Reamde, or whatever...just, generally, you could assume this was the plot of the new book: sympathetic, weary man of the sciences is called into some sort of meeting with some sort of specialized group relating to emerging technology where you get a brief, too-short explanation of the technology before some sort of emergency forces the protagonist/s to succumb to the technology and thusly involve themselves inextricably in the new world to deal with interesting fictitious problems related to the world afforded by said technology, until all but two of the characters are killed or in some way absorbed into the technology, at which point the protagonist/s extricate themselves, showdown with the leader of the group who facilitated the technology, who gets a dose of their own medicine and probably dies.

End of spoilers for Micro.

A. Bam, suck my balls, Crichton formula. B. Holy shit, Back to the Future is almost a Crichton story. The only difference is we'd keep getting flashbacks to Doc Brown in the '80s, seeing him become more and more implausibly evil, until at the end he accidentally gets killed in a time machine related accident after Marty gets back.

Micro was okay. I was interested, because it's fun to imagine fending off attacks by giant wasps and stuff. On the other hand, it felt more contrived than Crichton has felt since the end of "Prey," and was generally kind of texty. (As opposed to subtexty.) I think another seventy pages in the right places would have helped that part of it.

Unrelated to this book, I'm generally a fan of Crichton, for the same reason I'm a fan of Nolan. Smarter than average pulp fun. Don't look too too hard, and you'll have fun with the thing. My favorite of his is probably "The Lost World," followed by the mileage-my-vary "Sphere."

You? Go.

3,413

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

I just read it on the plane ride here. I was...not crazy about it. Crichton is...

...well, let's do this in a new thread.

3,414

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

He should. It's an NP2k thing there, I think.

3,415

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

HA. I hadn't thought of that. Ope.

Oh well, I'd still rather see another Inception. Fuck Chad Peter, and you can tell him I said that. His momma dresses him funny.

3,416

(33 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dude, you should meet Chad. You have no idea.

3,417

(99 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Sixth Sense. Thanks dad. It scared the shiiiiiiiiit out of me.

Most intense line of dialogue you've heard?

3,418

(80 replies, posted in Episodes)

Merry Christmas, ya filthy animals.

3,419

(99 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I did this for my dad, actually. I didn't grow up with vinyl, I grew up with tapes, but my dad had a massive record collection and as a kid I fucked up one of his favorite albums - the soundtrack to the off-Broadway musical "Forever Plaid." I tracked it down on CD and got it for him a few years ago because I felt bad.

Also, Forever Plaid is a really fun show, I grew up with it and it explains a lot about me. Here's a bit they did on the Tonight Show twenty years ago.

What's the best concert you ever attended and why was it the best?

3,420

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ha, the guy who did those Sweded trailers for TDKR and Avengers is an old buddy.

Irritating how many times he goes viral, there's been three big ones in as many months.

3,421

(122 replies, posted in Episodes)

Huh. Interesting observation. I think he didn't think about it too hard.

3,422

(16 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'd say yes, but I can't tell you for sure that he's not copying us. This has happened before.  tongue

EDIT: Just watched the review. I'm very proud of us, now, because he only made one major point we didn't make, and we made many more. Take that way-more-famous-internet-reviewer-guy!  big_smile

3,423

(99 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Answer the question above you, then ask something else. Subject doesn't matter.

What's the most awkward you've ever felt?

3,424

(198 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, probably...though I think we discussed that at length in the first anniversary show.

EDIT: Yep! 58:54-1:07:57 during the 1st anniversary show is Trey going into that process and the movies for 2010, which isn't exactly timely, but it's something to tide you over in the meantime. smile

3,425

(14 replies, posted in Episodes)

All-star first post. Welcome to the forum, sir.