326

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nobody mentioned Bruce Willis' most famous one-liner:

Nowadays many people don't even remember that, in the first movie, it made sense in context.

327

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a9/Frankenweenie_%282012_film%29_poster.jpg

It's not just an homage to Frankenstein and similar "old school" monster movies. First and foremost, Frankenweenie is a touching, sentimental story that anyone can relate to. And it's not bad. Not bad at all.

328

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Marvel's The Avengers:
- I have an army.
- We have a Hulk.

329

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The hero-villain confrontation from The Dark Knight Rises (spoilery):

SPOILER Show
Bane: Theatricality and deception are powerful agents to the uninitiated... but we are initiated, aren't we Bruce? Members of the League of Shadows!
And you betrayed us!

Batman: You were excommunicated... by a gang of psychopaths!

Bane: I AM the League of Shadows, and I'm here to fulfill Ra's al Ghul's destiny!
You fight like a younger man, with nothing held back. Admirable but mistaken.
Oh, you think darkness is your ally. But you merely adopted the dark; I was born in it, moulded by it. I didn't see the light until I was already a man, by then it was nothing to me but BLINDING!
The shadows betray you, because they belong to me!
I will show you where I have made my home while preparing to bring justice. Then I will break you.
Your precious armory, gratefully accepted! We will need it.
Ah, yes... I was wondering what would break first...
Your spirit, or your body?

330

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saniss wrote:

If we're gonna go through the classics...

RoboCop comes to mind:
Dead or alive, you're coming with me.

(I re-watched the trilogy recently.)

331

(68 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Speaking of John Carpenter... They Live has a famous one:
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and I am all out of bubblegum.

332

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Marcus wrote:

I'm going to chalk it up to not having seen this episode since before I became brilliant, but this one just blew my mind.

It's from 6x12: "Ship In A Bottle"

333

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b9/Alien3_poster.jpg

I saw the alternate version (the "Assembly Cut") for the first time today (I saw the theatrical cut numerous times over the years, but that's another story). There are some changes, but they don't affect the plot in a significant way (in general, they just make the movie longer).

Is this version any better? Not really. It still doesn't hold a candle to the first two movies. David Fincher himself seems to think that Alien 3 is unsalvageable (he didn't want to participate in creating a Director's Cut for DVD/Blu-Ray, so they had to call it an "Assembly Cut").

334

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/Chipmunks2squeakuel.jpg

My expectations were pretty low, but this turd managed to disappoint me anyway. It's a weird mix of childish humor and adult references (Silence Of The Lambs etc.) that reminds me a little of The Phantom Menace. On a positive note, I gotta admit that the squeaking furballs are far less annoying than Jar Jar Binks (at least they're competent at something).

I would recommend it only to preschoolers.

335

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

ST-TNG had this gem:

Our reality may be very much like theirs. All this might just be an elaborate simulation running inside a little device sitting on someone's table.

336

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

- A top-secret government program involving instantaneous travel to other solar systems, by means of a device known as a "Stargate".
- Sounds like a good idea for a TV show. If you're into that sort of thing.

(From Stargate SG-1... obviously.)

337

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

sellew wrote:

However much of a fan Jason Segal apparently is, the script doesn't entirely respect the characters.

As one of the guys said on the Roger Rabbit commentary: you can get a blowjob from somebody who doesn't respect you.

338

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

Such movies can fuck you up... Two weeks ago a strange gelatinous substance appeared near my TV set. You know what my first thought was? "Ectoplasm! We have a poltergeist!"

(Turns out it probably came from a cracked dehumidifier.)

I still maintain that the first Transformers movie is a fairly enjoyable adaptation of an inherently RETARDED, cartoony concept (a concept that was invented to sell toys to children). It could've been a lot worse (and it's gotten a lot worse in the sequels).

340

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

You realize the The Wizard of Oz, was a book first right?

Of course, but it's pretty safe to say that the songs contributed much to the success of the 1939 movie.

BigDamnArtist wrote:

The Great and Powerful Oz has a LOT of problems, none of which would have been solved by throwing in songs just to parrot the 30's movie.

Sure... Dorkman and DocSub mentioned them in their reviews. The pacing and tone issues definitely need fixing.

341

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Oz_-_The_Great_and_Powerful_Poster.jpg

Much has been written about this movie in the "Reviews" section already, but I don't think anybody mentioned the thing that bothers me most - the lack of songs. The Wizard of Oz is a charming, joyful MUSICAL. The prequel is nothing like it.

Just another attempt at exploiting beloved classics. Overall, a pretty big disappointment.

342

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/14/Evan_almightymp1.jpg

A rather mediocre attempt to cash in on Steve Carell's rising star (just after The 40-Year-Old Virgin happened). An unnecessary sequel to the fairly decent Bruce Almighty. Even Morgan Freeman's divine awesomeness wasn't able to save this movie. It bombed. Deservedly.

343

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

SWAT is not a sequel to The Fly.

V for Vendetta is not a sequel to Dial M for Murder.

The protagonist of Dirty Harry doesn't seem to have problems with personal hygiene.

Can we include TV shows? Knight Rider is definitely not about a medieval chick who liked the cowgirl position.

344

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Solaris had nothing to do with Sun Microsystems' clunky OS.

345

(36 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dave wrote:

Also, I completely understand why you would obsess over Kim Novak

I, on the other hand, don't understand why anyone would reject Barbara Bel Geddes. Such a cutie.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Studio_publicity_Barbara_Bel_Geddes.jpg/476px-Studio_publicity_Barbara_Bel_Geddes.jpg

346

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

I saw Rosemary's Baby on TV recently and I'm pretty sure that the controversial flashback to Satan's eyes (when Rosemary sees the baby for the first time) wasn't there. Maybe I just blinked and missed it... but I'd prefer to think that it was an improved cut of the movie.

347

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

PorridgeGun wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/jGCuTWu.jpg

Superman III gets the tone completely wrong. For a better (subtler) take on humor, see Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut.

It's scary to think that Star Trek IV could've become another Superman III (that's what the Eddie Murphy version probably would have been).

348

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/54/Paranormal_Activity_poster.jpg

A fairly effective scary movie with a healthy dose of suspense, although I wouldn't call it "one of the scariest movies of all time". Overall, Paranormal Activity is not bad for a "found footage" movie (at least it utilizes this concept pretty well, especially when compared to Apollo 18), but I still prefer horror films made without this conceit.

EDIT: Katie Featherston is a cute little pudge, I'd like to see more of her big_smile

349

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Philip wrote:

I really enjoyed this and the follow up, Children Of Dune, as well.

I'll probably rewatch Children Of Dune while I'm at it.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c1/Doorsposter1991.jpg

The program for this evening is not new.
You've seen this entertainment through and through.
You've seen your birth, your life and death.
You might recall all of the rest.
Did you have a good world when you died?
Enough to base a movie on?

One of the most controversial Hollywood biopics. An intriguing, trippy story with a rather loose structure. The Doors concentrates mostly on one aspect of Jim's personality (the pretentious "Lizard King" who's constantly drunken or stoned), but is enjoyable nonetheless. A good performance by Val Kilmer.

350

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/85/Dune-miniseries.jpg

OK, technically it's a TV miniseries, not a movie, but it's still a contiguous story. I was familar with the original version, but today I watched the Director's Cut for the first time (the differences are hardly noticeable).

What works:
Ian McNeice. The cinematography by the famous Vittorio Storaro. The elaborate sets and costumes. The rich, detailed world and the story (to be fair, we owe both mostly to Frank Herbert).

What doesn't work:
The visual effects (they're obviously 13-year-old TV-grade CGI). The thick Czech accents. Some of the backdrops (they're a little too obvious).

The director's name is John Harrison. I wonder if the villain from Star Trek Into Darkness was named after him wink