Allison wrote:

Oh, and I was 100% serious with that Melisandre question. Do you guys really think she's evil? I would say Team Stannis probably has some of the most solid "moral" motivation in the series, if you can really rule something objectively moral.

Well, I've always thought part of the appeal of the books was that very few people are clear-cut evil, but I have thought of Melisandre as further down that spectrum. Part of it for me might be that I listened to the books on Audible, and in Clash and Storm the way Roy Dotrice voices Melisandre is very cool but very sinister.* Plus the whole demon-shadow-baby business. She is pretty much the only one who talks sense about the danger beyond the Wall, but the "spreading peace by the sword," convert-the-heathens crusade aspect to her worldview makes it hard for me to get in her corner.

*(He didn't originally do the audiobook for Feast and when he came back for Dance he didn't bother to bone up on what he'd done before and all the voices and pronunciations were completely different.)

Brian wrote:

Maybe they had to make a trade off between casting the best actor for the part and the best skin tone.

Are you really saying you think it's entirely likely there were NO capable actors who matched the character's described appearance more closely?

Brian wrote:

Or, if we dare, actually wait until we see his performance.

His ability as an actor is not the issue under discussion.

Protip for my fellow white people: in discussions about representations of race in culture, saying "I don't see the problem" is not only not a good argument, it is a statement of the problem.

404

(93 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'll see it because everyone I know will want to talk about it. I have zero interest.

What Zap said matches my feelings quite well. I think the shots where the robot uses a big ship like a sword were supposed to be the clincher, but for me they were the nail in the coffin that this movie is going to be dumb, and most likely not fun-dumb.

But hey, I didn't hate WORLD WAR Z, so there's no telling until after the show.

405

(255 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saniss wrote:

I was told that I'd have to go through 20 pages of describing pipe-weed, and read whole chapters about families with so many names you can't remember a third of them. My guess is that the people who told me that probably never actually opened Tolkien's novels.

The people who told you that most likely read the first chapter, "Concerning Hobbits" -- which is completely that -- looked at the number of pages they had left to go, and gave up. But after the first chapter Tolkien gets down to the business of telling the story and it's a much easier read, although I found that the also became much easier to read after seeing the movies.

406

(255 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Started and bailed on audiobooks for both Under the Dome and Footfall. You could play Stephen King Bingo with all the tired tropes and archetypes King slaps on the page (everyone thinks in obscure song lyrics and they're somehow all thinking of the SAME obscure song lyrics all the time; religious villain has an idiosyncratic cursing vocabulary; etc.), and Footfall was just not engaging to me in the slightest. Both felt like homework and when I realized that I stopped listening.

Meanwhile, I read Joyland in about a week and enjoyed it. It's light fare and has a supernatural element slugged in that the rest of the story frankly did fine without, but since it wasn't such a major time investment the somewhat weak ending didn't bother me, and pretty much none of King's self-conscious Stephen Kingness gets in the way.

I'm now reading Watership Down, a book I've heard a lot about but never read before. The rabbits just got to Cowslip's warren and I'm pretty sure they're going to get eaten or something.

Also reading Lest Darkness Fall, in which a 20th century man travels back to Imperial Rome (fuck you, that's how) and tries to stop the Dark Ages from occurring. In the vein of Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, it's more a comedy than a thriller, in the sense that it is completely a comedy and not at all a thriller.

407

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The term is less about what would make it better in a rewrite, and more what an audience member brings to and accepts as already part of the "canon" of the movie, even though the movie does not establish it.

If you're arguing a plot hole in a movie with a friend who likes it more than you do, and they justify how the plot hole actually isn't that big a hole, and it involves some variation of the phrase "We can probably assume..." they're bringing their own concrete to fill in the hole.

408

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Filling in plot holes with ideas, events, or other elements not present in the film itself.

409

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Why not? It's not like extra boards cost money.* I can post my prequels and finish fixing the Matrix sequels.

(*Do extra boards cost money?)

410

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

Bathilda wrote:

Attack of the Clones is my favorite Star Wars movie.

http://i.imgur.com/zFUx1cF.jpg

411

(40 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, that's the one thing about J.J.'s writing style that gets a little old, and his protege Lindelof took that ball and ran with it hard.

As aggravating as it is to us normals, I think it's actually part of what gets these guys the jobs. The beancounters reading the scripts don't know from story, but the script sure seems EXCITING AS HELL and a skimming executive can catch all the IMPORTANT PARTS because they're RIGHT IN HIS FACE.

Trey wrote:

Of course by the time Hobbit II comes out we should be well into Star Wars pre-production.

http://i.imgur.com/IEhciIY.jpg

413

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

This has been bothering me for a while and I need to say something.

In this episode, I make a joke about Padme "asking for it" (i.e to get raped) with the way she dresses in the fireside scene. There's certainly a joke of some kind to be made about the mixed signals going on in that scene -- mainly in Lucas' handling of it -- but in the years since this recording I've grown to realize that so wasn't it.

I've never been called out on this, publicly or privately, so I'm calling myself out. I can't change the recording but I want to go on record here and say -- to anyone who has listened to this or may do so in the future, and is hurt or upset by a misguided attempt at humor of which I've come to be ashamed -- I'm sorry. I hope to do better.

414

(162 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eh, too obvious. Lex Luthor is going to be played by someone completely unexpected and, on paper, inappropriate; the internet will froth and rage; then the movie will come out and he'll be amazing and the froth-rage will turn to fellatio and everyone will pretend they had vision all along.

415

(162 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think this is the first movie in a long time where my own reaction is completely mixed. The stuff that's good is really good, and I honestly think this is the best Superman movie yet made. It's not "gritty," but it is serious, removing the irony from all the proceedings and aiming to deal with Superman's internal conflict as much as his external. I don't think it entirely succeeds, but I appreciate the effort.

At the same time, the action, while delivering incredible spectacle, is so monotonous it becomes numbing. I can only watch cartoon people smash into the sides of buildings so many times before I begin to check out, regardless of -- or maybe as a result of? -- the amazing destruction simulations, and that post-9/11 obsession with falling skyscrapers we have often noted was just out of hand here.

416

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

See, those NIGHT BREED posters are a great and telling example of the importance of a good poster. As someone who knows nothing about and has never seen the film, my eyes just slide over that first one. Lazy, generic, indistinguishable from any number of crummy VHS covers I used to see in rental stores and would never give a thought to.

The second one I go "Oh shit, I have to see this movie."

417

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

I know I'm blaspheming and all to question the master, but... is it just me or is that Being Human poster kind of awful?

418

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thing about Mondo's movie posters is, as you say, they do a rather poor job of selling the film; they're really meant for folks who are familiar with, and have an affection for, the film.

I'm honestly not really clear what you find so #1 about the MAN OF STEEL poster you show. I can appreciate it, but compared to a great iconic poster like JAWS, I find it too busy, without a good flow -- the streaks interrupt the flow by their nature, and the blue one coming out of his side in particular just confuses my eye.

419

(162 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm seeing it at midnight, so I'll have an opinion around 3AM.

redxavier wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

...and realize he'd already written the chapter he's about to write. Twice.

You joke

I wasn't, entirely. I found the latest book (the latest two, even) extremely aggravating in their repetition.

When the story advances, it's still good stuff. But you have to wade through five chapters of Brienne being mistaken for a man and moping about it, and six of Tyrion asking himself where whores go, before you get there.

I like what we saw of Smaug. Seeing that massive head come around the corner gave me the bottom-dropped-out-of-my-stomach sense of terror he deserves.

As for the rest, ugh. As Red said, Jackson is actually making the unengaging cartoons the old guard has been accusing genre filmmakers of making for the last few decades. After HOBBIT 1 I wasn't expecting otherwise, though it is gratifying to see I'm not the only one who feels that way among genre fans.

422

(38 replies, posted in Episodes)

This one's for you, Doc.

It is ever and always "when it's done."

Maybe if he didn't do his writing on a goddamn Speak & Spell it would go quicker, since he'd be able to review the writing as he goes and realize he'd already written the chapter he's about to write. Twice.

/annoyed by Dance with Dragons

SPOILER Show
I think it's the Shelob problem. After a huge climax like last week's, you don't want to follow it with another one.

Next season should start with a good ol' bang though.

425

(52 replies, posted in Off Topic)

bullet3 wrote:

A positive review from Harry Knowles means fuck all, he might be the least credible person on the internet.

Especially when he ends the review showing himself gleefully gripping hands with Brad Pitt, so proud that the star of the film he's reviewing pretends to like him.