And this time I got to participate!
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Jeffery Harrell
And this time I got to participate!
It was inevitable, really.
Now I feel bad for trying to be funny instead of helpful. Sad-face emoticon.
Speaking as a consumer — NOT A PAID ENDORSEMENT — I have to say that the last one of these was really surprisingly easy. You go to that there page Teague just linked and sign in with either your Twitter name, your Facebook name or an arbitrary nickname. Then there's picture and sound, and it's surprisingly good quality for what it is.
It's Flash, though, so you have to have that in order to play.
You have to put in your credit card number, and they charge you $2.99 a minute. But hang in there through the first half hour or so. Once Teague takes off his shirt, it gets really good really fast.
(DISCLAIMER: May not be true.)
Heh hem. Scroll up slightly.
AND YOU WILL LIKE IT!!
Now read what I wrote.
Also, if I were gonna refer to celebrities by a neuter pronoun, it'd have to be "they." Cause boobies come in pairs.
Like Signs and Sixth Sense, The Village showcases Shyamalan's nifty skill at creating terror from the simplest of everyday situations.
Yes, exactly. He's got something in common with Steven Moffat in that (shut up, I'm a geek), I think. He can find suspense or fear in mundanity.
My favorite moment in "The Village," and frankly probably the moment that takes it from "okay" to "not bad" on my personal scale, is when William Hurt's character takes Bryce Dallas Howard's character into the shed. "Try your best not to scream," he says. It's just a great moment.
As for "Unbreakable," let me just say this. There are only three movies in the vaguely defined "comic-book genre" that I would classify as really very good: The original "Superman," "The Dark Knight" and "Unbreakable." It's the comic book movie for people who have absolutely no interest in comic book movies.
It is, shall we say, deliberately paced, though. Don't watch it right after downing four shots of espresso.
I don't understand how it's possible not to hate THE VILLAGE.
At the risk of sounding condescending, it entertained me. Again, I'm not saying it was great. I'm not even going so far as to say it was objectively good. But I preferred the experience of watching it to the experience of watching, say, "300." No accounting for taste, I guess.
I do not, however, remember anything about the advertising. Maybe I'd be right there with you if I did.
LADY IN THE WATER was unforgivably dull and self-indulgent.
I agree with every word in that sentence except "unforgivably." Again, recall that I didn't pay money to watch it. I probably would have been harder-assed if I had.
As I say, I have no particular quarrel with UNBREAKABLE -- it's not as good as SIXTH SENSE…
See, we're in opposite places on that, I think. I have no quarrel with "The Sixth Sense," but I didn't think it was as good as "Unbreakable." The fact that I have never seen "The Sixth Sense" again except for that once in the theater and that I own and re-watch "Unbreakable" regularly if not exactly often sums up, I think, the difference in my opinions. Neither sucks, but I prefer one decisively.
I didn't hate "The Village." It wasn't the greatest movie in human history, I fully concede that. But I saw it in the theater, and after it was over I had no urge to demand my money back like I did after I saw "The Ring 2." (Actually in that case, I set the theater on fire. Stupid automatic sprinkler systems.)
Similarly, I didn't hate "Lady in the Water." Caught it on cable, so probably my standards were lower, but even then I can agree that it was a failure. But it still had atmosphere, and Paul Giamatti's performance was solid, and plus it was a story I hadn't seen before, so that was all more or less okay.
I haven't seen "The Happening" or the new one, which I understand are off by themselves on the badness scale. Maybe if I had my opinion of the other films would be tainted.
But no, seriously. "Unbreakable" is just a damn fine film. I haven't re-watched it recently enough to get specific, but maybe I'll pull out my DVD of it tonight and give it another go, then report back.
(Also, I didn't think "Signs" was entirely terrible. Liked it less than "The Village," more than "Lady in the Water." You know, just in case you between here and Twitter you don't have enough reasons to hate me today.)
I failed to keep score as well as I should have, but I think it broke down like this:
Teague: right.
Everybody else: wrong.
"Synecdoche, New York" is, at the very least, a good movie. It might be a great movie. I'm not sure. I saw it months ago and I'm still processing it.
Not having seen either the film in question or the series it was based on, I have only one thing to add to this thread:
Shyamalan can make another five or ten bad or just not-great movies, and he'll still be on the plus side of the line with me. "Unbreakable" was that good.
Okay, so, here's the thing.
I do like it. I honestly and truly do. But at the same time, saying I'm gonna like it just makes me want to dislike it out of spite.
We're beyond the looking glass here, people.
Also, my date for tonight canceled on me at the last minute, so HI I AM COME TO ANNOY YOU ALL.
Ohhey.
"Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow."
Huh? Huh?
Yawn.
Brian, my friend from another time zone. The theme of the show was "What is it that makes us — rather than them, whoever them happens to be — worthy of survival?"
The finale answered that question this way: "Learn from your mistakes."
I will let you slide if you say you just don't buy that, for whatever reason. But to deny that that's what was going on, when the writers practically tattooed that question and answer on the actors' foreheads, would be tough for me to accept.
And yet, somehow, it was still a really great story.
So nyah.
Oi.
I will not stand for Battlestar badmouthing.
Quibble with it all you like, but (a) in the context of its time and (b) taken as a body of work, that shit was tight.
I assumed "I don't need to defend this statement" meant "I am aware this statement is indefensible."
Yeah, it's kind of been their thing.
You know who had really really good episode titles? Battlestar Galactica.
Title clash will only become more and more of a problem as long as one-word titles remain trendy. I believe in their first season Universe has Air, Time, Light, Earth, Justice and Banana.
The parameters of the myth was, is it humanly possible to catch an arrow. Not "under battle conditions" or anything like that. Just was it possible, full stop, to have the reflexes necessary to catch an arrow out of the air.
Well, I haven't watched that episode in a long time, but I don't really recall it being that narrowly defined. The Mythbusters guys tend to take a pretty holistic approach to their premises. As I recall, it was more along the lines of, "Could a ninja really have done that shit?" Not, like, in his back yard with a lot of preparation and practice, but in a setting where it would actually mean something.
Basically, we now have scientific proof that ninjas are pussies.
I dunno. Fugly is as fugly does. And Billie Piper has that thing where she runs her tongue along her upper teeth…
I'll be in my bunk.
Karen Gillan. Google her up if you like, but pictures don't do her justice. She's got this eyebrow twitch thing that just drips sex.
Some women, once they get out of their thirties, settle into a sort of look that could, at best, be respectfully called "handsome."
Every once in a while, a woman comes along who, on the back side of forty, looks about a zillion times hotter than she ever did when she was in her twenties.
Maura Tierney is one of those women.
My comments on the Transformers films (and Batman Begins, on which I don't think I've yet had flimsy pretense to pontificate here) notwithstanding, I'm pretty forgiving of stupidity in movies. Maybe it's because I'm just not very smart myself, but if I'm sitting in a theater engrossed in a story, absurdity has a decent chance of flying right past me unnoticed.
But my thing with Surrogates was that it just wasn't a very good movie. It wasn't interesting or exciting, and at no point did I care that much what happened next. I've seen safety videos on airplanes that were more captivating.
I've got more love in my heart for a film that deeply offends or infuriates me than I do for one that fails to engage my emotions at all. After I watched Surrogates I popped in my DVD of Episode II just so I could feel something again.
I kinda have a little crush on Eddie too, now you mention it. Let's fight over him.
But tonight the stickee in my head is of the feminine persuasion.
You guys know that thing where, for no special reason, a girl (or guy I guess) kinda gets stuck in your head for a while?
Cause I do.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Jeffery Harrell
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.