This is kind of off topic, but Trey brought something up that's stuck with me; the bit about how "better quality doesn't change our bottom line." I can't help but wonder if that's what's been happening with the studio system in, say, the last decade or so. The difference is the studios do have the money and time for all the flashy fx, and don't seem to care as much about telling good stories.
I'll site Alien 3 as an example here. They knew they wanted to keep the franchise going, and went through no less than three different scripts (and several directors), and ultimately the movie we got bears little resemblance to what the guy who got the credit wrote. People went to see it (including myself) because it was just "Hey, another Alien movie!" The industry has literally become a Field of Dreams; if we make it, they will come.
Don't get me wrong, there are still plenty of talented people out there, and as we've explored on the show, plenty of good movies being made. But we've also had many examples of films that could have been so much better with just a bit more effort. I'm not sure where the blame lies here, either with the business like machine of the studios, or the public who keep paying to see movies with little regard for quality; I suspect it's a bit of both.
Until the public becomes more discernible, I'll have to content myself with the fact that the system does produce something worthwhile occasionally, and that there are groups like this out there that do care. I'm good with that.