451

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Rob wrote:

That's a solid limerick right there.

Just wait till someone mentions a female magician named Blunt.

452

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TOO LATE! I've already devoted my life to worshiping Christopher Hitchens!

Here is the first limerick in my forthcoming Hitchensian Bible.

Christopher Hitchens, the barracuda,
opined on the fellow of Judah
   Drank wine till he crawled
   Got fat and went bald
And ended up looking like Buddha

453

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

paulou wrote:

In Theravada he's just like, human. A genius, but completely human. No magic murder cesarian.

... I tend to take exception to the use of "blessed one" because of it's divine implications, and prefer the other accepted definition,  "auspicious one." Since any concession to the divine is an insult to the wonders of the natural universe.

Well, that certainly lowers the bar for becoming the center of a worldwide religio-philosophical movement. Can a Temple of Christopher Hitchens be far behind? He got fat and went bald even.

454

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

...if you symbolically eat his flesh...

No no. You ACTUALLY eat his flesh and drink his blood. The true miracle of transubstantiation is that it doesn't TASTE like human flesh and blood.   hmm

455

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My grandparents were Baptist evangelists (traveling the country, singing, preaching, saving souls) and were the salt of the earth. Much of my terrific family remains religious.

I realized that Christianity was a misguided attempt to explain history and create a stable community when I left my small town to go to college. But my faith had been strained for a few years before that when I got tired of the youth minister pleasantly instructing me about what a sinner I was when I never did much of anything wrong. Baptist ministers love to tell their congregations that they are terrible, backsliding sinners for some reason.

But then, that's about all they've got once you've accepted Jesus as your savior and gotten your ticket to Heaven. After all, except for televangelists, Christians don't claim that God will make you prosperous and fruitful and destroy your enemies anymore.

456

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:

Recently I've seen Dennis Miller in both Murder at 1600 and The Net, and he's been the most sane, calm person in both movies. I'm not sure if he was on too much drugs, or not enough.

(I don't know if Dennis Miller has ever taken drugs, he always just struck me as that nervous, twitchy character...)

Yeah, he was great in Murder at 1600, better than Paul Reiser in similar roles IMO. Too bad he didn't keep acting. He could be on Law & Order or something.

457

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ask a dozen regular Christian churchgoers their understanding of Satan, demons, Hell, and judgment, and you'll likely get a dozen different answers, most of which come from pop culture. There's no explanation for Satan or demons in the Bible, but they're all over the place in the New Testament.

458

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Darth Praxus wrote:

There was no concept of a singular Adversary called Satan until Judaism began to take its cues from Zoroastrianism.

Yeah, and that's what's weird about calling Judaism and Christianity "monotheistic". They go way out of their way to claim that 1+1+1 = 1 god, but there's also this god of evil lurking around every corner, ruling Hell, and trying to make you buy dresses.*

*Mainly applies to Flip Wilson

459

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

WAIT. I'm totally changing my position. There IS a God.

http://hollywoodlife.com/2010/02/26/jen … ad-autism/

PS I love this forum and, against all odds, this thread.

460

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Everything about the Great Flood is sort of awesome and hilarious. From the lack of any geological evidence, to the bristlecone pine trees in California that are older than the Flood, to the fact that the whole world had gone to hell just 700 years after Adam, to the "correction" of dates for Methuselah to avoid his being still alive at the time of the Flood, to the animals (4 of each, by the way, and 14 of the farm animals and birds*).

Google Noah's Ark and you'll find people insisting that dinosaurs were on the ark and no animal ate meat until after the Flood and so on. It's amazing.

And just 100 years later, WHILE NOAH IS STILL ALIVE, people are off building the Tower of Babel. And God is like "We** gotta stop this! They'll be building cars and computers next! Make them talk funny!"

http://legacy-cdn-assets.answersingenesis.org/assets/images/articles/2009/01/timeline.gif

* "seven of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, and also seven of every kind of bird, male and female...." Genesis 7, unless you want to believe the lying whore mouth of Genesis 6

** Him and Satan, I guess? Satan helped him out later when they decided to gamble with Lot's faith.

461

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What more do I have to do to prove myself to you, Trey?

At 9 AM tomorrow, I will cause a traffic jam in Los Angeles to prove my might.

Also, I will cause freezing cold weather across the Midwest and East Coast.

Also, I will make Jim's dog slightly more awesome in a subtle way that will take him time to discover.

Also...pick a card, any card.

Is THIS your card? Show
http://www.zarban.com/pics/ziggy.jpg

462

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just watching Where Eagles Dare (1968), the WW2 movie with Richard Burton and Clint Eastwood. Because it's a war movie, you'd expect the cast to be principally male, but Burton's character has a couple of game female agents posing as servant girls behind enemy lines.

When Eastwood meets the second one after climbing in a window off a cable car, he wearily observes "You seem to have a lot of women stashed around this country, major."

463

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Happy new year, chaps! Face the world with a dandy stance in 2014!

[video (unkown provider)]

464

(373 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:
Darth Praxus wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

I'm curious as to your source that Jews were polytheistic and then turned monotheistic. ...

To start with, Dorkman posted this extremely useful video in the Raiders thread....

There's an incredibly fascinating and illuminating book called The Human Faces of God: What Scripture Reveals When It Gets God Wrong (And Why Inerrancy Tries to Hide It) that has a whole chapter devoted to polytheism. ...

Heavy on the Hebrew and linguistic side of things but this article discusses the verses in question at length:
http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/v … s_fac_pubs

But that author is just arguing (rather unsuccessfully in my opinion) that Yahweh and El are one god in two specific passages. He completely concedes that they were separate gods at an earlier time.

465

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

School pal came up and we went to see 47 Ronin and loved it. It's somber but has a sly sense of humor. The direction is a little shaky here and there, in that some of the dramatic beats could have been landed a bit harder. We both loved the dragon fight.

Then we watched The World's End on Blu-ray and enjoyed it quite a bit. It's quite maudlin for a while but ramps up suddenly to real hilarity. It kind of loses its way at the end, in my opinion, and becomes a bit cartoony, but still enjoyable. I rank the 3 Cornettos as Hot Fuzz, then Shaun of the Dead, then this.

This morning, we watched White House Down. I'd heard that it was funnier and better than Olympus Has Fallen, and I agree but it's so close as to be a photo finish. Fun-while-it-lasted Die Hard retread.

Then we finished off with The Last Stand. A bit familiar, but it has plenty going for it. Good job all around. Johnny Knoxville adds welcome spice.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--Uyan0tJ_lk/UYq17Bcp69I/AAAAAAAAMHE/kLyLEgpOBLU/s1600/Monsters+University+-+International+Poster+1.jpg

Monsters University was a great deal of fun at the time but I've come to think that it's the ultimate triumph of storytelling over story.

The story is VERY familiar: part Animal House, part Revenge of the Nerds (not to mention a fair bit of Harry Potter and Sky High). The plot hinges entirely on Mike and Sully knocking over a trophy, which is about as thin as it gets. And the scheme to get back into the scare program involves winning a team competition in scaring, even tho scaring is not a team effort and actual scaring is literally the last thing they are required to do.

So: storywise, it's a mess.

BUT, the storyTELLING is terrific. It's funny, it has heart, the animation is enchanting, there's solid setup and payoff, the characters are memorable and have clear arcs, and the cinematography backs up the storytelling (the commentary talks about the use of lighting to reinforce emotion).

So: the WAY the story is told overrides the problems with the story itself.

The best examples of this are probably...
1. Mike is somehow getting straight As in the scare program even tho the entire point of his arc is that he is not at all scary. The film does this very careful thing of suggesting that Mike gets good grades because he works hard to have the book-learned answers but just doesn't have "it". But there's no way around the fact that you should not be getting As in scaring if you can't scare.

2. Mike and Sully get kicked out of school despite accomplishing one of the greatest scares of all time right in front of the exact person to appreciate it AND who could keep them from getting kicked out. Instead the dean continues her unbroken run of being an unbelievable cunt... right up to her REDEMPTION SCENE. That's right: a redemption instead of a comeuppance, a bizarre scene that amounts to "I don't completely hate you. Here's a newspaper showing you getting arrested. Have a nice life!" And the audience is somehow left thinking "oh, she's not so bad after all." It's bizarre.

What the movie probably should have done is have Mike realize on his own that he's never going to beat rival Sully, and then they decide that they really just want to beat Johnny and his gang, so Mike helps Sully become truly great. They become a real team in what is usually thought of as a singular pursuit, and the dashing of Mike's dreams is not the climax of the story. You could even have the greatest-scare-ever sequence by having ROR kidnap Mike and toss him into the human world and Sully go in to retrieve him, creating real-world stakes above and beyond the competition.

467

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

I think he means that it's a cartoon, and the characters are obviously cartoony, so there's no point in trying to make the backgrounds look hyper realistic.

Exactly.

468

(32 replies, posted in Off Topic)

And I think restraint extends even to all-CG films. I watched Monsters University today and enjoyed it, but like Tintin, many of the sets (especially exteriors) are so realistic that they could work in a live action film. In MU, it works fine altho it's pointless, but in Tintin, the characters in that world seems to be humans wearing giant fake heads. There's something to be said for cartoonishness in animated features.

469

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Best wishes to everyone. I scanned a bunch of old family photos and copied them to portable hard drives to give to my brothers and sisters. That went well.

I got some jeans and 2 Steve McQueen movies, raided from my Amazon wish list, which reminded me that he used to require boxes of blue jeans and whatnot in his movie contracts and take them his old reform school to spend time with the boys on the holidays. So I donated a few bucks to a couple of homeless shelters in his honor. Complicated man, but cool and properly Santa-minded.

470

(135 replies, posted in Off Topic)

johnpavlich wrote:

The thing that amazes (and angers) me about this whole thing is that Shia keeps apologizing for "forgetting" to credit Clowes, but still has yet to apologize for the act of plagiarism itself.

Right. The Beef is trying to make people think about attribution and not theft of intellectual property. That's why he's copying apologies without attribution. Meanwhile, his lawyer is surely talking to Clowes about how much money it will take to avoid an IP lawsuit.

Shia is NOT concerned about money ("I have to give $10 thousand to one of my heroes? Oh well..."). He only cares about how he can avoid this hurting his career as an actor and film maker AND his ego.

471

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/145b2070889f5b835398303337f2d08f/tumblr_mevkm2iEpp1r2rvdyo1_250.jpg

Snail wrote:

My ending was... and then SHARKS!  big_smile

My ending was... and then APES ON HORSEBACK!

473

(135 replies, posted in Off Topic)

But seeing someone take credit or money for someone else's work and creativity is crossing the line for just about everyone, including the share-it-all-on-Pirate-Bay crowd.

My guess is that the current generation will age out of bit torrent life and condemn its excesses in the same way that young people aged out of psychedelic drugs and turned on them in the 1980s. They're heady with power now but will change as they age and discourage their own kids from doing what they did. It will never go away, but may greatly diminish if it's really stigmatized.

474

(135 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh lord. It sounded like a lawyer wrote that apology, but this is just getting weird.

EDIT: I wonder what Gaffigan and Lennon think about this. They're both respected writers. And comedians in particular are rabid about material being stolen. I bet Lennon won't say anything (he doesn't want to burn any bridges as a screenwriter), but Gaffigan will say something publicly before long.

475

(135 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

I haven't seen the thing he's ostensibly cribbing.

I'd never heard of it either, but the first page of the comic is reproduced in the Buzzfeed article. Characters, setting, some shots, verbatim dialog... Yikes.

Sergio Leone and FW Murnau did the same thing. A decent check makes this all better.