26

(11 replies, posted in Episodes)

Of course you are right, and we are nonsense.

27

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I haven't had the guts to go back and revisit it because, while I enjoyed it as a college kid at the time of its release, I'm relatively sure I won't care for it 10 years on. What little I can remember of it strikes me now as pretty hamfisted and emotional-cudgel-y (and WIWH looks about the same). YMMV

EDIT: Basically, you know the "It's not your fault" scene in GOOD WILL HUNTING? That's GARDEN STATE the whole time, set to an early-millennium indie rock soundtrack.

28

(11 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Seeing a lot of people posting about this. How did this backer screening business work?

29

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't know how he went this long without knowing anything at all about ALIEN or its iconic scenes but I'm glad he did. His reaction to the chestburster is exactly what you'd want it to be.

30

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

If it makes anyone feel better, Transformers will keep Paramount in business and fund about a dozen other movies.

All of them TRANSFORMERS sequels.

31

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's possible. I'm grumpy because TRANSFORMERS.

32

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

See guys? It's all the Jew's fault.

oh shit wait that's not what I

33

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This took a turn for which I will not be held responsible.

34

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

johnpavlich wrote:

Who decides for everyone what is and isn't of value and when does this cross over into book burning territory, if ever?

Invid wrote:

As the saying goes, freedom of speech is only needed for the stuff you personally don't like. It's fine for you to promote the type of criticism you enjoy, point out the flaws in the other stuff. Both have a right to exist, though.

Oh for god's sake. He's not advocating for a Congressional ban on this crap. Let's not get so melodramatic that we start actually, without irony, arguing that we're on a slippery slope to Hitler for thinking CinemaSins are trash. ("book burning"? Come on.)

35

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

johnpavlich wrote:

It's like a complete dismissal of Fridge Logic. We'll just invalidate Fridge Logic as a worthwhile form of criticism. That way, we can do whatever we want because it doesn't matter. All that matters is WHY people are watching Indiana Jones falling a mile down a waterfall in an inflatable lifeboat and surviving.

Fridge Logic IS an invalid form of criticism, to a large extent, because by definition it's something you didn't notice until well after the film was over. It actually goes to the central point of the article -- at least what I think the central point is, FCH makes my eyes glaze over a bit -- which is that a logical problem is only a problem if it takes you out of the story. If it would take a bunch of plot gymnastics to justify something people aren't going to care about in the moment, the moment is more important. Something completely logically consistent but dull as a result is far inferior to something inconsistent but so engaging you don't care.

Fridge Logic is not completely irrelevant, as the problems can compound and make it difficult or impossible to enjoy the movie on repeat viewings, which is what I think separates an enjoyable movie from a classic. But it's not the main course as criticism goes.

Your Indy example is not Fridge Logic because that's something that stands out as you're watching it. When plotting issues distract from the story even the first time, that's when they become huge problems.

36

(169 replies, posted in Episodes)

Boter wrote:

Eps VII through IX need to be good and I need to enjoy them at least as much as the prequels

...

I want to enjoy them as much as I enjoyed Transformers or Pacific OW STOP HITTING ME

If that's your bar, I think you'll be fine.

Michelle Fairley says no plans for Lady Stoneheart.

Nope, I'm sorry, I'm going full Jojenpaste on this one. I refuse to accept that they're cutting LSH after they went to all the trouble of setting up Thoros of Myr. I've decided she meant there were no plans to put her in S4, is just trying to throw us off the scent for later, and I will continue to believe that until the series finale airs without her.

FROM MY DEAD COLDHANDS

Heh, that TMNT trailer half-sold me actually, despite the lame Bangarang knockoff track. Leonardo trying to do an action movie leap over a truck and pathetically failing made me laugh.

I also enjoyed the "So...they're aliens?" "No. That's stupid." Flagrant fanservice after the rumors, but smart.

39

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The site is called War is Boring. He reviewed a movie about war and says it was boring. Does what it says on the tin, really.

40

(73 replies, posted in Episodes)

Story is social commentary. That's the point of telling one. All those other things are just the means to the end. To study all the technical aspects of the how but categorically exclude the why defeats the purpose entirely, in my view. And is probably part of the current problem with the way people currently review, and make, films.

41

(73 replies, posted in Episodes)

Very disappointed at how this thread has fallen into mansplaining. We have the benefit of having women's voices in this conversation, guys. Don't just leap to "explaining what's wrong with" their perspective.

I'm rather firmly of the "slow motion is gross and lazy" school of thought and approve of its non-use in GoT.

I suppose slo-mo can have its place, but I think the majority of the times it's used these days are unnecessary. The lack of artifice is what makes GoT interesting as a fantasy story, IMO, just as the juxtaposition of the fantastic and stylized made True Detective more interesting than it probably had a reason to be.

Herc wrote:

I do wonder where exactly they'll put Lady Stoneheart next season though. It's a shame this show doesn't do cold opens 'cause that would make a great "what the actual fuck?!?" one for the premiere.

It would make a fine closer for the premiere too, or any episode at all quite honestly.

Oh, and the line about Tywin not shitting gold -- I can see them finding a way to work that in later, when Tyrion talks about what he's done. And I hope they do, because it's a good line.

EDIT: the full-on magic missile business didn't bother me watching it, but discussing it with Trey and Eddie on Twitter just now has changed my feelings and made me a bit disappointed -- not that the show went there, but that it didn't lay the groundwork. By this point in the books we'd heard the legends about the Children of the Forest almost as often as we'd heard references to the Others, so when Bran finally met one of the Children it had a whole "legends come to life" thing to it. But I don't remember if they've ever mentioned them at all in the show -- maybe in season one with Old Nan? -- so instead in the TV universe there's just a sense of "Well I guess this is a thing now, too; dragons and wood nymphs and fuck it, no rules."

So anyway, I liked the episode. Sad not to see LSH -- but the thing about this adaptation, versus something like Harry Potter, is they're mix-and-matching events. When HP cut something out of, say, Goblet of Fire, that thing just no longer existed in the HP film continuity. They weren't going to find a way to fit it in later -- which hosed them a couple of times. But things not appearing in this season don't necessarily mean they'll never appear -- except in cases where the story has already passed them over. That is the case with Coldhands, but not Stoneheart.

It's interesting as the show goes on to discover the things that GRRM apparently admitted to the showrunners he wasn't really going anywhere with.

Loved the Harryhausen fight. Amazing it only takes ten years to go from needing ILM and $100M in Pirates of the Caribbean to being able to turn around something pretty close in quality on an HBO budget and schedule. It shouldn't amaze me -- VFX innovation actually does reliably follow a trickle-down model -- but it always does.

Interesting that they altered Tyrion's murdering Shae to have her go for a knife. As I recall in the book it was much more cold-blooded; she tried to put her spell back on him and he choked her slowly and deliberately. I missed the "hands of gold are always cold" setup/callback but I will NOT miss "Where do whores go?"

It's weird that the season almost felt like it was trying to wrap things up on a hopeful note, like they didn't know if they'd get another, when they've already been renewed for another two.

they need to do everything in the books exactly liek in the books except the parts i don't like they should do it the different way i want

46

(60 replies, posted in Episodes)

Isaac wrote:

There is a problematic aspect to your point about letting women drive the discourse on matters pertaining to women, which to be clear, I very much back you on.  Any time a man states an opinion about feminism and a woman argues the opposite position, the man's opinion is automatically trumped by the woman's because he is not a man, right?  That seems bad but maybe it is a reasonable bad.   

I do consider the Little Mermaid and Twilight to have anti-feminist components.  I'm certainly not saying anyone man or woman who enjoys those stories is in the wrong or being a bad feminist but I find the messaging more than a little troubling.  Should I be able to make my case?

The important thing to realize in these kinds of conversation is that as a man, you (and I) are automatically less informed on the subject of what it's like to be a woman, and therefore should do more listening than talking. Also consider that there's a very good chance they already know your perspective and have heard it and had the same conversation before with other men. The whole thing is that your case, the male perspective, is often already made, it's the baseline social assumption. They've heard your side, or a variation on it, significantly more often than you've heard theirs.

That being said, I would be extremely interested in hearing an argument in favor of Twilight as a feminist novel. I wouldn't say it's explicitly anti-feminist, but it certainly seems to promote and celebrate all of the social structures feminism seeks to oppose.

Oh, bless your heart.

48

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

Didn't someone just comment about how studios are using practical again because CGI has become so cheap?

Or am I imagining things again?

Other way around I think.

Yeah, you're never going to find a producer saying "We can't do it this way, it's too cheap."

49

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Loved it. It's everything we're always asking for movies to be in the show. Sharp, sense of humor, tightly paced, clear and constantly escalating stakes, telling a human story, exploring the concept without belaboring the point, with visual effects serving the story and not the reverse, and an unsexualized female mentor character who doesn't exist solely as a love interest or to go to pieces at the 11th hour just to make the main character seem more heroic by contrast. This is the new gold standard for blockbusters.

50

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Why Bogus Journey as the pairing?