The first commentary to a movie I previously had not seen. Did not realize this was Darabont. I will have to put off listening to this till i see the movie 1st.

Im with trey on this one. My basic reaction when I first saw it was pretty negative. Overtime I have softened my stance but I think i may have just caved to peer pressure.  The characters are pretty shallow and none of the characters make a decision that they wouldnt have made at the begining of the film. Its not terrible.

Absolutely great podcast. I really enjoyed it.
"They are magic, thats great. How do i punch them in the dick?" really made me laugh.

I have yet to see Precious. I just have severe problems with the story in hurt locker and obv avitar. The blind side is totally throw away. Up I really enjoyed but I can understand why some people didnt love it although i really did. I also have a dog that is a real life version of dug.

The characters just felt real and George Clooney went out of his standard Infallable charming character. In this his character has serious emotional damage. I was expecting something that was a cross between thank you for smoking and juno. Although I like those movies those characters always feel like cartoons. These characters have strong emotional grounding that allows them to be more 3 dimensional. At the end I cared and was sad for his character even if all of it was telegraphed.

The PC isnt going anywhere. The modular design of it has yet to be beat for general use. The standard computer may end up being more of an enthusiast product but it will remain around for along time. Anything that wants to test the limits of what a powerful computer can do will have to use this design for awhile.

The ipad and iphone are a newer type of product and may take over the "online experience" for the more casual user. The reality is that neither are very good for doing anything except playing on the internet, jotting short emails and watching simple media. I dont knock people for wanting or liking it. The same way i dont knock someone for driving a hybrid instead of a lamborgini. Both have their merits

http://www.movieline.com/2010/04/attack … php?page=2

how they work, why the autobots can only be cars, why some cjan change what they turn into. At some point dont you think shia would ask? I know i would.

Ohh i certainly did not pay money to see this pile of shit. And i blame everyone one who did for allowing good money to be spent on crap like this.

im curious about the top films of all time. Those are not actually adjusted for inflation. Those are bodies in the theater.

Im curious if

a. the cost of going to the theater back then was the same adjusted for inflation. Meaning I bet inflation considered that the cost of going to the movies was more like 5 bucks back than the 10 bucks in current dollars.

b. some of those movies didnt have what we would consider a limted theaterical run. I think gone with the wind was in theaters for 30 years. Hence blowing up its number so high.

Enjoyed the movie when it came out. I heard all the super flop talk before its release and went to see it for the "waterworld effect" . I was blown away. I cried like a girl and  good manipulative movies do that to me. I think i saw it three times total in the cinema. loved it each time.

Hell they dont even make a classic edition in any digital format. really disappointing.

Im sure they all own it,  but have packed it away or left it at their friends house.

I enjoyed hellboy2 much more than hb 1 or pans,

It seemed that with the success of the really out there creature design in pans lab really gave guellmo a ton of license to do the same in hell boy 2, just with a much bigger budget. Hellboy 2 looks way too original to be a big studio movie. It has the best creature effects and design I can recall from a big budget movie.

I think that would be fun to hear also.