26

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Star War is so cool...

27

(26 replies, posted in Off Topic)

And in the midst of this heatwave, I'm going to Secret Cinema's Empire Strikes Back showing tonight!

Do you think X-wing pilots wear shorts?

28

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

I'm pretty sure the USS Theodore Roosevelt is never going to be crippled and adrift in the Persian Gulf because "the computer" went down.

Coming in Summer 2017!

29

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

To be entertained I guess. It's not an unrealistic expectation with these sorts of films. That this series fails is a testament to how bad they are.

That said, Extinction was more entertaining, mostly due to Stanley Tucci, than the utter shite that was the third film.

The chinese have a whole genre that is basically their equivalent of our fantasy - Wu Xia. Basically, swordplay stories set in a quasi-historical setting. As for specific recommendations, you have something like The Blade or Ashes of Time which is low fantasy (Conan-esque), and then Zu Warriors of the Magic Mountain, which is at the high fantasy end of the spectrum (flying swordsmen, magic, ghosts).

edit - I appeared not to have read that right, I thought you meant non-European, eg, Asian and African, rather than non-all three of these.

31

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I see what you mean in terms of closure for Brienne. It is a little weird that we don't at least see her after she 'kills' him.

I don't see how Jon's death was in any way wishy washy though. As I said before, the length of the shot clearly establishes that he's dead and there's not really anything cliffhanger about it.

32

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Could be, it's easy to get so conditioned by the violence and gore to expect it whenever a character is killed but I don't believe that the absence of a shot with Stannis' head rolling across the snow should be taken as a sign. Though we really don't know at this point! It happens in the books all the time....

And on Jon, that could just as easily be taken to mean that they wanted to let you know that nothing was happening, he wasn't warging into Ghost, he was really dying there and no-one was jumping in to save him. The actor and producers are saying that he's really dead and not coming back. I'm not sure how much to trust that, but it would be insane to have waited out the last 5 years expecting Jon to live/come back to life only for him to be really dead vs mostly dead.

33

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That was my favourite bit as well!

I loved the season finale. I generally like most of what the show does. I'm also now comfortable with watching the show end the story, as it looks like GRRM is years away from finishing the next book, let alone the one after that.

Regarding Stannis, I thought they handled him well here. What he did last episode has had an enormous effect on him and whilst it worked with the weather, it failed to elicit the same benefit from humanity (as it should not have). Of course, his death reveals that ultimately Stannis is doomed to fail in the books as well.

34

(22 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I agree that the death needs to make sense and have an effect on the story or the characters. A key thing too is to have an investment in the character that dies, ie, we should care enough (either negatively or postively) to feel something (and that can also happen indirectly through another character that has a strong connection to the deceased). I'd argue storytelling is entirely about playing on the emotions of the audience. When the evil witch is defenestrated by the hero in the finale, we cheer precisely because she's been so villainous up til then. When a hapless random guy is riddled with bullets on the street, we feel a tinge of sadness because we just saw him with his loving wife and he was awkwardly rushing out with the garbage.

What you don't want to do (IMO) is kill characters just so that you can prove the danger of a situation. When Redshirt 21 steps on an ancient booby trap and is blown to smithereens, you're not fooling anyone that Kirk is going to do the same.

35

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

To be fair, they have been laying the groundwork for a while. Shereen specifically was first mentioned a few episodes ago and Mel has been noting the power of King's blood since the early days.

I find it to be a step too far for Stannis, and although there is a heavy foreshadowing of sacrifice in the mythology surrounding what Stannis is supposed to be in the story (or rather what Mel believes him to be) I just think the show has solidified its own portrayal of Stannis as a baddie.

The problem there is that I don't quite agree with that reading of Stannis, him turning up at the wall and defeating Mance's army is an awesome and heroic moment in the books but in the show it's almost sinister. So, that they have gone that way is interesting and possibly revealing about book Stannis' ultimate direction. After all, can a Stannis that burns his daughter be a Stannis that is a hero in the story?

36

(31 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Owen Ward wrote:

EDIT: The Secret Cinema people actually got in touch asking me to take the review down. Oh well, if you fancy a read I'll send it via PM.

I wasn't able to read it all either but got the gist. Thanks!

My main confusion at the moment is the sign up process. Is your RebelX identity the same as the actual screening event? Where do I see information about what extra items to bring?

37

(349 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ok, so the show is pretty much at that point it's passing the books. I'm not sure how I want to continue, mainly because there are some big events coming (particularly in the North) which I would much prefer reading. And whilst, yes, the show is its effectively its own thing, there are some currently hanging book resolutions that must be spoiled by the show. Not necessarily how they happen, but the what happens.

And that's the question. Anyhow else having this dilemma?

38

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That looks really intriguing. *Crosses fingers*

39

(255 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Blade of the Immortal is the best comic I have ever read. Or rather, it is my most favourite of them all. I remember the moment after reading several of the first volumes where I realised that the comics I had been reading up to that point had been superficial crap. I think this is still true for 90% of what's out there.

The artwork is rare in that you can 'see' emotions so well and not just the most obvious. For instance, pick up any comic off the shelf and you'll see someone angry (their mouth open or gritted teeth) or happy (they're smiling), but bemused? charmed? contemplative? content? Somehow, what are essentially just line squiggles for mouths reveal so much about what these characters are thinking or feeling. The artist is completely in tune with his characters.

I've not picked up the final books yet. I've also a few to catch up on that I actually have (saved for a rainy day).

40

(31 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Owen Ward wrote:

Anyways, this year they're doing The Empire Strikes Back and it looks to be their biggest production to date. You get assigned a character & class to be (not someone from the movies, I'm a Galactic Explorer called Sang Lendix) and are encouraged to dress up in some sort of costume, so I've had fun putting that together. I'll be heading down to London tomorrow and hope to have a blast.

Hey, how was it? I'm going in July.

41

(149 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So... Witcher 3 (again). Still playing this one, and today I experienced something entirely new for playing a game. Dread. A real, stomach-churning fear of what was to happen. Basically, I had a quest to return to a place where I knew there were some pretty awful and powerful people. I really didn't want to go there, and I didn't know what to expect (and my imagination was going wild), but I also knew I had to go back, because these people are utter monsters and I had unfinished business.

It turned out ok in the end, but for a brief time I was extremely uncomfortable playing a game. And that was wonderful.

Further, the cinematic presentation of this game is excellent and really effective at helping the story-telling. As is the design. It's a game where you fight monsters all the time but I couldn't help but think 'oh shit, I do not want to fight this guy' when I was going up against a knight in black armour wielding this particularly cruel axe.

42

(149 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So... Witcher 3. Great game. I have sworn a few times due to the controls (though I think it's more my sorta broken xbox controller that's the cause of many of these snafus) but otherwise it's a great game. Immersive and beautiful, with a good world setting. I had played Witcher 2 and enjoyed that too - this one takes all those same gameplay mechanics and improves upon them all.

It also frequently makes you choose and sometimes those choices are easy (as in, I'm a nice guy so I'll let x happen) and at others they're quite hard. I just recently had to make a choice about whether to believe a character and later I realised that I probably made the wrong choice, and it's really annoying me!

I love any game which makes you feel like this.

43

(11 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I've not forgotten this, just been rather busy these last couple of weeks and I wanted to watch it again to see my take on it has changed.
Hope others were able to watch!

44

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I wouldn't worry, those sorts of classic superhero comics are of a bygone age and are more reflective of the time in which they were written rather than representative of the format. Contemporary comics are at least more subtle, if not just better written overall.

45

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Bravo! I enjoyed reading that. You should do a podcast or something wink

46

(96 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Red, (or teague) you'll need to amend your suggestion post with the right formatting so it shows up on Lamers app thingy.

I'm very confused about the formatting. I took it direct from the first post when I made the suggestion, has it changed again?

In any case, terrific that High and Low got chosen. I'm always eager to convert more to Kurosawa.

47

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm quite surprised we don't have an Age of Ultron thread. Awesome film.  big_smile

48

(70 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just seen this (finally). What an engrossing, beautiful and thought-provoking film. I loved every minute of it. That it doesn't answer every question sweetens the experience. Further, I can't help but think that it's a 2001 with all the characters and emotions that film lacked.


Sam F wrote:
Writhyn wrote:

The end shows Hathaway contemplating a placard which leads us to think that the science ship was destroyed there and people killed. So people keep saying she's alone.
She smiles and starts walking back to a large, powered camp the camera suddenly reveals. Is this supposed to be for just her?
I thought it showed that this planet was the success, and the scientists were alive and helping her prepare a colony.

If I recall, the placard was a burial for that scientist she had loved. The camp was there when she got to the planet, but everyone was dead by then, because something like 80 years had passed since she left Earth. So she was picking up where they left off.

I don't recall the wormhole collapsing at any point.

There was only ever one scientist that reached that planet, Edmunds, as all the Lazarus astronauts were solo missions. He presumably died sometime between his arrival and the Endurance's departure from Earth.  That last shot is her burying Edmunds and returning to the camp that she has set up or added to with the equipment from the Endurance. It's inhabited by her, CASE and that point some babies in tubes.

So Murph isn't quite right that she's alone out there.

49

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I concur wholeheartedly on Takeshi Kitano. His films are strange but compelling. And as an actor he has great presence. He appears in Battle Royale for instance and steals all the scenes he's in.

50

(164 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's pretty obscure in retrospect. It's from Three Kings (which hopefully we'll have voted in as a FIYH movie club choice sometime), and the response in the movie is something like "who gives a shit these people are dying!"

Most people remember song lyrics, I remember movie lines (but not lyrics, I'm hopeless with them).