26

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I know man, I think it's going to be cool as heck.

Here's a tiny one line of Rocket talking.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nyddEhXSvA


Other character videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9z04zXq7jk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rf2a8zBrM4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q104YhObyV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3H9zLGkGlY

27

(25 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Friends in Your Head and that's about it.

Every few weeks I'll check out Fatman on Batman because Smith takes forever to do episodes.

28

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

Here are some people who this movie would be in good company with...

http://www.cracked.com/video_18769_4-pe … 2340k.html

Nah, the GotG are all about giving a fuck.

James Gunn wrote:

"For me this movie is about family," he continued. "It's about a bunch of people that don't have a family and they learn to love each other. And I think it's about giving a shit. I think we live in a world where we're taught that not giving a shit is the coolest thing, and this is a movie that says it's really OK to give a shit."

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ … O1BLVJk.99

29

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The whole point of Guardians of the Galaxy (the one the movies based on, there was another team that used the name before) was they took all these forgotten, weird and some outright stupid characters and brought them all together, reinventing them in this big space war against unstoppable giant bugs. It was really neat to see all these weird characters from different corners of the galaxy and Marvel's publishing history come together and given a new spin.

It's almost baffling it's getting a movie, not only because of how weird the characters are, but these aren't tried and true comic "classics" like Thor, Spider-man or even Iron Man who was at least well known to comic readers. The iteration they're making the film out of came about in 2008 and was eventually cancelled due to lack of readership, so as a fan of the books, the fact we're even getting a movie is a fever dream come true.

30

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

FireFighter214 wrote:
Eddie wrote:

Dave Bautista said he wanted the role badly, went to extra acting classes, read through a ton of source material and lobbied hard for it.  When he got the role, he said he dropped to his knees and wept.

Hey Eddie, can you post a link to that article, or was it from an offline source? It sounds like a very interesting read.

It was from the Comic-Con panel, here's a page with some other tidbits from it.
http://avengersuniverse.com/2013/07/20/ … confirmed/

I know James Gunn also said his chemistry with Pratt was another big factor in his casting.

It would also probably help when Alfred was describing his fantasy early on, to not actually show it. I knew immediately when he was telling Bruce in the Batcave about it and then it cut to the cafe that this was going to be whole scene was going to be done again, but with Bruce actually there. If he just told me and didn't show me I probably would have forgotten it until it came back to pay off. May be just nitpicking, but that was something that stuck out to me immediately upon leaving the theater.

Dead or alive, you're coming with me!

33

(168 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm pretty excited, though I am a bit biased, having been a fan of the comic. The fact that THIS of all their properties is getting a film is something I daily can't believe is actually happening.

I do agree a bit with Trey, about not feeling Star-Lord in the trailer, but I don't think they cast him for the "abs". The dude was pretty doughy when he was cast and "abbed up" for the role, so hopefully James Gunn saw something in him we didn't get to see in the trailer.

Ooga-chaka.

34

(29 replies, posted in Off Topic)

We could...buy Trey a BOAT?

35

(44 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was tempted to write a review up in the review forum but couldn't get past "You should seriously go see this movie". I went in expecting Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs but with Batman, to be surprisingly entertained by a movie that doesn't really have any right to exist - as with Cloudy - and got more than I ever expected. I can't even describe the movie beyond pure happiness and excitement at this point, to the point I need to see this movie a second time so I can gather myself and put into words why this movie is so fucking awesome.

Ewing wrote:

Is there any chance we can get some 97-99ish complaints for South Park? Back then it was a cultural phenomenon and far more in-your-face offensive than it is today. I'd love to hear some of the shit parents were writing to the FCC when it debuted.

Furthest back I could find for either show.
http://www.governmentattic.org/docs/FCC … 004-07.pdf
http://www.governmentattic.org/docs/FCC … 003-07.pdf

As a bonus, I also found Family Guy complaints.
http://www.governmentattic.org/docs/FCC … 005-07.pdf

The Daily Show also has some interesting complaints and observations.
http://www.governmentattic.org/docs/FCC … 004-07.pdf
http://puu.sh/4VXom.png
http://puu.sh/4VXqF.png

Some of these also have responses from the FCC, which are also interesting to read.

Dorkman wrote:
KayRule wrote:

http://puu.sh/4VOOF.png

It's been a number of years since I watched the show -- was this really an episode? I can kind of see it passing as one of the Treehouse of Horror vignettes but it sounds more like Carrie's mom having a fever dream.

In the same boat as you, but taking a quick drive-by through wikipedia none of this seems to have ever even remotely happened in an episode of the Simpsons.

Several complaints seem to be from completely imagined episodes of both shows.

Stumbled upon these and found them a quite entertaining read. Even if you feel the shows have declined or never cared for them in the first place, it's fascinating to see what some people have to say - as well as the intended age group many parents seem to think these shows are for.

http://www.governmentattic.org/9docs/FC … 8-2012.pdf
http://www.governmentattic.org/9docs/FC … 8-2012.pdf

Here's some examples. Things can range from parents feeling the content of the show is unfit for their 4 year old to standard "this offended me" claims to a homeless man convinced the show is mocking him.

Examples are in image form because the format of the PDF files make it incredibly time consuming to paste over.

http://puu.sh/4VP4L.png
http://puu.sh/4VOXs.png
http://puu.sh/4VOOF.png
http://puu.sh/4VOLZ.png

Been giving me something to read when bored, so I thought I'd share, as I'm sure others could find enjoyment from this as well.

39

(48 replies, posted in Episodes)

paulou wrote:

And Brian, yes, the author of that manual was advocating for sexual assault. It's like, exactly what sexual assault is.

Yeah, I was a bit confused on Brian's dismissal. Perhaps if Dorkman had lead with this quote?

Actual Quote from the Book wrote:

“Pull out your cock and put her hand on it. Remember, she is letting you do this because you have established yourself as a LEADER. Don’t ask for permission, GRAB HER HAND, and put it right on your dick.“

yikes

Can you guys please do Zoolander because I need more excuses to watch it again. Thanks and god bless.

41

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

The new archive version of 28 Days Later has an error at the end where Trey keeps repeating "Kay fair enough" over and over again for about 10 seconds before abruptly cutting to an extremely quiet end of "friends in your head.com" outro.

I dunno if this is an error from when the outro was slapped on or if it's something intentionally added to confuse the shit out of me.

42

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

We get prizes if our suggestion gets picked, right????

43

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, in all seriousness Hold Your Applause is really good. The only problem I foresee is that another podcast group already has the name. Dunno if they hold the trademark, but it'd probably not be the nicest thing to do, all things considered.

44

(469 replies, posted in Episodes)

Blockbuster is no longer taken, right?