Trey wrote:

The DGA would fight that to the bitter end, but the WGA would shrug and say Why Not, because it's already exactly like that for writers.

Ha! I was just kidding around, but yeah — totally didn't think of that.

Look: "this some bullshit," etc..

But.

...if we're gonna have ten cooks in the kitchen anyway...

...and these movies aren't going to represent anybody's particular vision anyway...

...let's go whole hog! Have a good fight-scene director direct the fight scenes; and have a good drama director direct the dramatic scenes; and have a good comedy director direct the comedy scenes; and have a good alien-robot-spaceship-fight-battle director direct the alien-robot-spaceship-fight-battle scenes.

Makin' jobs!

We can even have a good fight actor play fighting Spiderman; and have a good drama actor play drama Spiderman; and have a good comedy actor play comedy Spiderman; and have a good... CG performance... play alien-robot-spaceship-fight-battle Spiderman!

I don't know how I would handle a situation like that, but I'm quite sure I wouldn't have handled it as well as you have. That's balls-to-the-wall infuriating.

504

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I am fascinated by the choices this score is making. It's fucking incredible. What a wacky idea; it totally works.

(Game looks fun too.)

ha

Good delivery.

506

(346 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You're welcome.

507

(13 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

You're too good to me. Knock it off!

I can't explain my sadness.

509

(108 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You're too good to me.

Abbie and I stumbled into a fun conversation in the movie posters thread, which we carried over into a funner and totally dispiriting standalone podcast episode!

This Is Fine

511

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Mmf. I dig it.

512

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

(Check your PMs.)

513

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Maybe we'll split credit 70/30 for that one. The rest is all you.

[EDIT: Nope, turns out I fixed your inadvertent self-servingness by serving myself a big 'ol potion of same. smile]

Anyway.

I really wanna keep playing with these ideas, but I need to get back to work — that said, this would make for a fun standalone Skype-cast, if you feel like recording such a thing. I feel like this is a topic which lends itself to throwing blanket statements at each other and seeing what sticks.

514

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Abbie wrote:

"The model is simultaneously designed to make people paranoid of spoilers without having anything that's actually worth spoiling."

This will be a candidate for 'best things you've said all month.' Savor it.

Furthermore, if I may mangle your quote by replacing your 'do-nothing' with my 'tell-nothing':

Abbie wrote:

"Show-nothing marketing campaigns for tell-nothing movies."

Fuck yeah dawg.

515

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sounds right — and every movie can be spoiled by its poster now, because every movie is a potential saga now.

I like the ideas we're bouncing off each other here.

EDIT: There's actually probably a lot of strange knock-on effects to posters as a result of the industrial newthink.

For instance, not only that they're [inappropriately] cagey about 'spoilers' in their posters because none of their big movies are presumed to be a nonquel anymore — 'nonquel'; copyright j'boy, 2018 — but also for the exact opposite reason: because no movie is presumed to be a nonquel anymore, they want separate ad campaigns for all of the aspects of the movie they might later spin off. All the characters, all the voices, all the settings, etc..

Hm.

516

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's not even how bad the posters are for new movies — and oh they are — it's that there are like seventy different images associated with new movies. Character one-sheets! Hooray! No two bus stops will look alike!

It's like they've industrially decided never to make an accumulating impression — much less a lasting one.

(Really, it's just that the industry isn't doing the same thing anymore. Different-everything. But this is the result.)

517

(86 replies, posted in Off Topic)

god

Look at the Verhoven image. We'd all have a cultural association with that movie for the rest of time, if they had made that 'The Image' of the movie. All of us, even if we never saw it, would recall such a weird, iconic image.

Consider the following 'old-style; new-style' poster list. How clearly and quickly does an association form for you?


What does the poster art for Back to the Future look like?

What does the poster art for The Avengers look like...?


What does the poster art for The Shawshank Redemption look like?

What does the poster art for Avatar look like...?


What does the poster art for Jurassic Park look like?

What does the poster art for Finding Dory look like...?


Bleh.

(Honestly, the closest recent example I've got for an old-school 'pick an image and own it' style is Deadpool 2.)

(To Ragnarok's credit, they did pick a very specific aesthetic unlike any other movie art, so that's a half-point.)

I love Sideways.

No clickbait; no 'easy' hot-takes — the floor for this thread is set at 'particularly insightful.'

If you think it meets that criteria, share it. Let's get a 'lil archive going.

***

These are in no particular order; I've watched all of 'em more than once. I'm limiting myself to one video per creator [for now, at least]; that said, I'm pretty sure literally every account below has at least two or three other videos I think belong in this thread, so go exploring if you find something you like.

520

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thanks for these. This is a treat.

Dang — it's way more obvious than I was expecting.

Keep your eye right on this circle, at the end of this shot:

https://i.imgur.com/oj9nqua.jpg

(How'd you become aware of this, anyway? Did you just notice this yourself at some point?)

I like how 'Teague-Interesting' is a thing, and 'InTeagueing' is a possibility, and yet no amount of wordplay can bring the two into a single phrase.

Aww. Thanks. smile

Also, it was fun giving Owen a tour of all of my internet-history shit that regular visitors consider meaningless.

Like... the bottle of Qui-Gon Gin that Ryan made for our RedLetterMedia AoTC party, which had been prominent in the YouTube video from that event which I made for the DIF feed; or, the Guy Fawkes mask someone left on my doorstep after the 4chan thing; or, the Radiopunk game [which we played!]; or the ironically-framed mustache Alex wore in Tokes & Stokes — shit like that. There are only a few people in the world who ascribe the same meaning as I do to these bullshit items, so it's a treat to 'introduce' them to those items for the 'first' time.

Anyway.

Internet friendships are weird.

I like it.

Oh yeah, a picture!

https://i.imgur.com/LT4eFZ3.jpg

Fun fact: the Qui-Gon/TV you see in this picture is directly facing a second Qui-Gon/TV on the opposite side of the room, so most of the time you see us looking 'to the right' in the YouTube video, we're actually not staring off into space — or listening to Owen — but watching the same video on a second TV and giving our necks a break.

Apologies to Owen for the 'or-listening-to-Owen' punchline, which would have befallen whoever was in that seat.