551

(62 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, the thing does wobble a bit, and then it cuts. That ending was one of the reasons I loved the flick so much. Nolan obviously knew that it would drive people nuts and start a conversation.

I think it's pretty obvious that he's still in a dream, tho, considering the fact that his kids are still identical to the kids in his dreams, despite the fact that it's supposed to be several years later. I think the fact that the thing starts to wobble is less a clue to the ending and more a clue to the whole movie. It's his totem and his dream. If he wants it to topple, he can make it do so, right? The entire movie could have been a dream.

If you think about it, the world he and his wife were in for "years" was supposedly at least a few levels in, right? And they were obviously still using their own familiar places at that time to construct their dream worlds. That's why he stopped doing that after his wife freaked out about it not feeling real. The problem with them experiencing years inside the dream is that when they 'died', they weren't shown waking up through several levels. Just one. Maybe it was meant to be implied, but if they spent years down there, what are the chances that they actually got all the way out? Maybe his wife actually did wake herself up.

552

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

I may be nuts, but shouldn't this have started like 10 minutes ago? I'm on central time, which is 2 hours behind pacific...

EDIT - I will leave this here to demonstrate how utterly stupid I am, but yeah...  I got here about 4 hours early cause my brain is dumb. I forgot the sun goes around the earth from east to west. The sun does go around the earth, doesn't it?

553

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

oh my god I actually woke up in time to do this!

554

(48 replies, posted in Episodes)

555

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

ID4 is my favorite Roland Emmerich film...

Which isn't really saying much, is it?

I hope I can make it.

556

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

I have to assume that Del Toro isn't dumb enough to leave something like the Pale Man scene in the film unless he wanted it there for a specific reason. I'll be damned if I know what the reason is, but I'm more likely to believe that he had some legit reason for doing that - at least in his own head - whereas there are many other writers/directors to whom I would never give that much credit.

But even if Del Toro did have some specific reason to write some of these more 'troubling' scenes the way he did, it doesn't mean that it makes any sense or that he shouldn't have done it some other way. If the goal was just to have an excuse to have the Pale Man wake up, a 'suspense' moment of him closing in on her while she was unaware, a moment where the Pale Man demonstrates exactly what he'll do if he catches her (eat her alive), and then have her flee to the next suspense scene where she's trying to make a door as he's closing in on her again... This is probably the most straightforward way to write that. Maybe that's all it is. Just writing it as plainly as he could.

As far as the replies to my original post RE: "it's an interesting detail, but how is that helping the story?"

I have no idea. I just find it fascinating. I didn't notice it until after I had seen the flick a couple times. There are some other things that I'd love to figure out as well. I haven't given much thought to the story about the rose that gives eternal life, but I'm gonna bet that it does have some correlation to the film. Perhaps the fact that the film has so many things like that that is evidence of some poor writing. If that stuff is SUPPOSED to make sense and enlighten the rest of the film in some way, then obviously I'm in the dark, and I assume a lot of other people are as well.

It could be a cultural thing, tho. It's possible that in Spain or Mexico these stories are obvious references to something specific to that culture.

@Jeffery
I agree with you, man. I didn't really go into it expecting much beyond "War" and "some fantasy stuff". Pretty sure someone had told me before I went into it that it was more 'reality' than 'fantasy', so maybe I was just better prepared for what the film was, as opposed to the people who just saw the trailers and thought "ooh, dark Alice In Wonderland!". The trailers were pretty misleading...

557

(47 replies, posted in Episodes)

558

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just registered, so "hi"

1) Silence of the Lambs - It's a thriller classic and pretty much set the standard of what a psychological thriller / serial killer film should aspire to. Kinda surprised no one's suggested it yet.
2) Jackie Brown - Probably Tarantino's least well known film. Pretty dissimilar to his other stuff.
3) Where The Wild Things Are - There seems to be two camps on this: you either love it to death or think it's pointless, dull crap.
4) Mel Brooks films would probably make for awesome commentary material. Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, or Space Balls.

If you want to get into some of the more obscure stuff you should consider some of the Takeshi Kitano films. Hana-Bi or Sonotine. One of the greatest directors currently walking the earth.