551

(25 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Pimpmobile?

552

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

EDIT: Oh goddammit. I meant to put this in off-topic. Can it be moved, or should I just commit seppuku to atone for my sin?

So a few months back I was in the mood for a really stupid comedy — you know the kind, something on the Farrelly-Apatow spectrum. Based on the trailer, I decided to rent "Adventureland," cause it seemed like just what I was looking for.

And whaddya know, it turned out to be a really good little coming-of-age story. It's got funny bits, sure, but not like jokey funny. It's sweet and smart, and kinda heartbreaking in parts, and it's got the best damn end-credits song ever.

But I swear, after seeing the movie, the trailer looks like one of those gag trailers where "Rosemary's Baby" is made to look like the feel-good family comedy of the Christmas season.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtVnRAY5LQE

I'm not gonna pull a Teague here and end with a leading question, but … okay, what the heck. Can you guys think of some other examples out there of movies that were just totally mis-advertised? It's not like a quiz or anything. I was just thinking about it, and while I know there are probably tons of other instances like that, I'm drawing a blank on 'em right now.

553

(35 replies, posted in Episodes)

Doh. I didn't even think to check if Netflix had it on instant.

And as for the Mac thing Mister Smuggy Guy, I watch Netflix stuff on my MacBook Pro and on my iPad all the damn time, so suck on it.

554

(35 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh, man. Now Nate's here too!? They'll let anybody in this place!

(Which is my way of saying welcome. I guess. Or whatever.)

For anybody else who can't get it from Netflix in time, iTunes has "The Core" for rent for $3. I'm all over it, baby.

555

(25 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Okay, so this is awkward.

See, some years back I mined my own first-love experience for a book I was writing. I mean I changed the names and everything, and made up this whole plot to go around it, but the hook was the story of my first love, and I turned it into this big stupid thing.

So now here I am trying to tell the real story of what really happened, only I keep wanting to quote my own best lines of dialogue from the story I wrote.

It's frustrating as hell.

So I'll just say this. Her name was Lauren, and she was perfect, and I loved her from afar until I couldn't any more. Also there was a guy named Greg involved, and he was a dick. He's probably really fat now. Like morbidly obese. Like one of those people you see on TLC where the firemen have to chainsaw out a chunk of wall the size of a swimming pool so they can forklift them out of the house and drive them off to the hospital in a special ambulance with a reinforced suspension. Yeah, he's probably totally like one of those people now. I hope.

(I told the story better when I was pretending it was somebody else's.)

556

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Thees whon.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/fxpo … i=60978475

557

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

Not personally. But it was just this past weekend that I listened to the fxguide podcast he did with Mike Seymour last fall.

(I'm totally just assuming it's the same Zap. How many Master Zaps could there be?)

558

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

I agree with those guys. The fun's back, y'all. Good show.

I had one of those weird experiences with this movie. I saw it once years back, probably on cable, and didn't really care that much for it. I didn't hate it, but I didn't get it, either. Like for example — and I'm not at all proud to admit this — I totally didn't get the whole twins thing until a good two thirds of the way through the movie. And when you guys announced that this one was coming, I was pretty meh. But I didn't have anything good at the top of my Netflix queue, so I figured what the heck.

I watched it last night — sans commentary — and wow, I really dug it! It's not the best movie ever or anything, but it's really very good.

It's a rare movie that overestimates the intelligence of its audience.

And just for the record? Ever since that one shot of her walking toward camera in that veil, Rachel Weisz has been my girlfriend. So back off. I seen 'er first.

(Master Zap, huh? Small damn world.)

559

(301 replies, posted in Episodes)

There are two ways to convert from God's frame rate — 24p — to PAL. You can either run the show through a hardware standards converter that does a frame-rate conversion without altering the total running time, or you can just conform the playback rate, which has the effect of shortening the film by about two and a half seconds per hour.

Maybe they're doing more of the former for Blu Ray and less of the latter?

</tv_nerd>

560

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Let me know when you implement "cat-like typing detected."

561

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Always? I thought I remembered hearing you'd done roadshows.

Either way, drinking game yes, overdoing it no, live show yes, pictures of you and Brian and Dorkman gettin' it on hells yes.

Any other polls being taken at the moment? I'm feeling opinionated.

562

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

It wasn't bad or anything, I don't think. I just hoped you had a ride home. And a big glass of water and a couple aspirin.

563

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm put in mind of … oh, god, which one was it. There was one commentary where it sounded like you, Teague, were really gonna be hurting in the morning. Princess Bride, maybe? I can't remember now.

Whichever it was, it was a fifty-fifty split between really funny and "wow, I hope he's okay."

564

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dude. I feel really old now. Thanks a bunch.

On the subject of drinking games, I'd vote for a film that's a little less likely to put people in hospital with alcohol poisoning.

EDIT: Trey, who beat me to the post button, is right.

565

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

THREEWAY. NOW. POST PICS.

(Hey, your forum cleverly rejects any posts that are entirely in capital letters. I will temper my enthusiasm with a parenthetical, then.)

566

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Then I say yes, yes, a thousand times yes, and Heaven help those who'd dare to stand against us.

567

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Aw, man. I was hoping they'd keep yelling at each other louder and louder until finally they'd pause, out of breath, and then kiss.

568

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's a podcast, dude. If I don't want to listen to four Shamalammadingdongs in a row, I can save em up and listen to them later, with breaks in between or whatever. Do theme months if you want. Let your heart soar.

I'm more interested in this live-something-dealy-whatever-you-said. Are you talking about streaming the show live with a chat room? Cause that'd be wicked cool, if you aren't dicks and do it on a Tuesday at midnight or some nonsense. Not that I'm bitter.

569

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Really? I really liked the whole in medias res thing, I guess because it didn't scream "hey look we're trying to start a franchise."

570

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So here's my take on it.

I have, before, in my life, done Webby-type shit. I had a blog for a while, there were comments, people came and left comments, it was a pain in the ass. Now I'm a moderator on another message board elsewhere, people come and leave comments, it's a pain in the ass.

What I'm getting at here is that running an Internet Thing™ is a pain in the ass.

Teague et al. give us a place to play and be silly and make nice-nice. If they want to declare that this thread is only for the discussion of custard and that thread is only for the discussion of fish fingers and that mixing the fish fingers and the custard is absolutely forbidden, my natural and instinctive reaction is to say "fuck you, you're not the boss of fish custard," and then the "oh right, pain in the ass, doing it for free" thing kicks in and I'm all "yes sir, whatever you say sir, please don't ask for a modest monthly subscription fee sir because I have all of those I really want already sir."

I'm a kiss-up to teacher, is what I'm really saying here.

571

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Until you get to the end of the third one, where Trillian gets all serious and philosophical. And then the fourth one is a drama with a tearjerker ending, and in the fifth one everyone dies.

But up to that point? Hilarious!

EDIT: Oh, but Bill Nighy as Slartibartfast was pretty great. Quibble all you want with everything else in the movie, but I thought he was just perfect.

572

(301 replies, posted in Episodes)

French toast is worthy. But it cannot surpass the mighty and sublime waffle.

And the pecan waffle? Well, just forget about it. Breakfast is a solved problem; let's turn our attention to other pursuits.

573

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

Like one and a half. I'm tempted to say one, but I can't because it was still better than Transformers 2.

I think it's Roger Ebert who says that his base criterion for judging a film is whether watching it is a more worthwhile experience than staring at a blank screen for the same length of time. By that metric, I'd say 300 failed.

574

(301 replies, posted in Episodes)

Wow. Do we have a new front-runner for the most-polarizing-movie award?

575

(301 replies, posted in Episodes)

Well, let's be fair here. I wasn't trying to give a lengthy and informed dissertation on the film. I just threw my opinion out there. You're totally right to call on me to defend it, but the truth is I really can't. It's been an age since I saw the film — only watched it once, on cable — so I'm not equipped to get all chapter-and-verse on it the way I did on Star Trek oh so many moons ago.

Let me me perfectly clear: I'm not saying you suck for liking it. I'm not even saying it's objectively bad. I'm saying it wasn't my cup of tea, to the point of active distaste. It lacked all the things that I like in a good movie. It was, to me, neither emotionally compelling nor thought-provoking, nor sufficiently mindlessly diverting to hold my attention. But it was so aggressively in-my-face about its lack of those qualities that I found myself actively resenting it. A bad movie can be a bad movie without being a dick about it. 300 was a dick about it.

Thus, it was not to my liking. I did not care for it. Chacun à son goût.