Well. Saw it. Didn't hate it. Didn't think it was vastly better than anything else we've seen this summer, either.
Better, yes - just not vastly better.
Rest of response spoilered just in case (but not particularly spoiler-y, really).
The premise was just as silly as Superman or Iron Man or any of the others, so that's a tie. And there was as much dumb "science" as those other movies, too - but not as dumb as Star Trek Into Darkness, which is still the summer's "I Am In Fact Not Smarter Than A Third-Grader" champ.
Just gotta mention my personal fave "whaaaaaaa?" science moment here:
"We had only fourteen months to build the first Jaegers. We didn't have time to think about radiation shielding."
Seriously, the topic never came up? Hell, when Marty McFly found out how the deLorean worked, radiation was the first thing he asked about. And he wasn't even an engineer.
I'm going to give the movie the benefit of the doubt and assume they really meant "We didn't have time to bother with radiation shielding." I realize I may be being too kind.
Character development was... sort of there in spirit...
"I lost my brother, so that means I... sometimes mention that I lost my brother."
"I can't Drift because of painful memories so that means I... wait, I'm okay now. Never mind."
"I am terminally ill, which... pretty much negates any actual sacrifice in my act of sacrifice."
The plot was... okay, the plot was to punch monsters until they all died. The subplot: "The Cast of The Big Bang Theory Visits The Criminal Underworld" actually had more plot than the plot.
Plusses:
Visually gorgeous. Obviously.
Flashback Shoe Girl deserves an Oscar nomination
The worldbuilding was better than most. They didn't do much with all those interesting ideas but at least someone gave that stuff some thought.
It wasn't a reboot or sequel. This actually counted even more than I expected it would.
What I realized while watching Pacific Rim was that the silly premise and by-the-numbers story and half-baked character development were no better or worse than most tentpoles. And yet, I found it so much more watchable than almost anything else this summer - because at least it wasn't another damn story I already knew.
Because, let's be honest here, what was "new" in Man of Steel? Man of Steel was the filmic equivalent of giving your Superman Lego kit to your little brother. He might put a few parts together differently but you already know what the parts are. The kit either makes Superman or it makes a half-assed stack of stuff that sort of resembles Superman. There are no real surprises in any reboot or sequel, only quibbling over the arrangement of the parts.
But - I had never seen a Pacific Rim movie before. That alone was so refreshing that the movie coasted right across the finish line on sheer goodwill from me. Just simple gratitude that I was not asked to be the last link of another Franchise Centipede and eat the same old shit again.
So is Pacific Rim great? Nah. Is it good? Well... there are good things in it. It's another Sucker Punch, pretty much. There's an audience for this that will love it and hug it and squeeze it... but not 200 million dollars' worth of audience, I don't think. Not in this country at least - but it may indeed turn out to be a smash in the rest of the world. We'll see.
Me - I'm disappointed in Guillermo this time out. Hellboy 2 proved he could deliver spectacle and interesting offbeat characters who have real feelings and make surprising but understandable choices. We didn't get much of the latter here. He did deliver on the spectacle, though.
And at least it wasn't fucking Iron Man. AGAIN.