I should have said 'one of the themes' rather than main thelme. Regardless, that didn't change, revenge was what led to the last act it was the bad guy's motivation all along.

It didn't work for you, that is fine but it didn't change the film's tone or genre, therefore it does not fit here. Bond is a tired formula and they changed it up and I say good for them for trying. It was a better film that Quantum Of Solace at any rate.

I genuinely don't see the ending of Skyfall as a fault. It mixed things up a bit, it changed the Bond format a little for the anniversary, I don't see the problem. I loved it.

Also, it still didn't change tone, the main theme of revenge was still there, the bad guy's main goal was still intact. As was the sense of danger and threat, it didn't even change genre.

Rush Hour 2 is by far my favourite of that trilogy. Moore directed Behind Enemy Lines which I remember liking at the time. Haven't seen it in years, though.

That and the fact that it was released on Valentines Day. Fox had no faith whatsoever in this film, they knew it was a festering pile of puke while it was getting made. So much so that they got John Moore to edit a 'kid-friendly' version for UK audiences so they could make more money by having the film rated 12A and kids could see it. The whole thing has been a shambles from the get go like hiring Skip Woods to shit out a script that makes you believe that he's never seen any of the previous movies. The same goes for Willis and his interpretation of the main character and he was in the previous movies. This John McClane is so far removed from the original character they may as well have called him Baldy McCrabpants. The marketing campaign of Die Hard was 'he's an easy guy to like but a hard guy to kill' but with the 4th and 5th films he has become a guy you want to tell to cheer the fuck up.

The sixth film better return to its roots, McClane has no more fucking family members to make up with, that is it so let's stick him in a confined space again, put a vest on him and let him grow some hair. Hire someone who actually has some knowledge and affection for the original film and who will not write McClane as an indestructible he-man. The whole point of him in the first three films was that he got hurt. A lot. The McClane of the first film reached a point where he had almost given up and was accepting the fact he was probably going to die, the 4th and 5th films having him act as though this sort of shit happens every day. Treat this franchise like you give a shit, Fox and then maybe the fans will again.

Haven't people seen Demolition Man? For shame.....

although that picture is less cool and more 'ewwwww'.

First ever and one millionth music video to play on MTV, anyone? Featuring Hans Zimmer on keyboard.....

It was directed by Russell Mulcahy who went on to direct Highlander.

I love The Rock (the movie.....aaaaand the dude) but that car chase is ridiculously edited. A lot of action films these days (especially Bay's stuff) don't have long takes, you'd be lucky if a single take lasts longer than five seconds. It's not smart, it's not clever, if anything it's actually lazy. It's poor film-making.

Shaky cam doesn't really bother me but it does bore me. They need to give it a rest.

Well, fair play to him.  I still think focusing on just story and characters while reviewing a film is odd but at least he's honest about it.

Well, if we're including ones from the 80s-

I don't think he is Gary Mitchell. The current IDW comics are canon, according to Roberto Orci, and the Mitchell story has already happened. The comics bridge the gap between the films, so if it is true, Cumberbatch is playing someone else. Either way, we'll find out soon enough.

If this is real I wish to subscribe to this magazine-

EDIT: It is very real and is from an Australian free paper called mX.