Is there a list of Commentaries that were recorded but for whatever reason (loss of audio file?) the recording was lost?

There'll probably be completists out there that have to see it in every combination possible.

It'll be interesting to see if HFR takes off, or just feels like cheap video.

Ow, that's painful. But is it as cringeworthy as this infamous example...

Anakin: I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere. Not like here. Here everything is soft and smooth.

Here's the winner of a Bad Writing Prize... Judith Butler...

The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.

If I get out my ruler, there's more flesh showing in the first image than the last one, due to the high boots.

You have to admit that since Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor, women are portrayed a lot less passively than in previous decades. Today they can be strong, independent, snarky, decisive, and confident.

Sexualized and sexy and idealized and "primary purpose" are just abstract categories with no clearly defined boundaries and lots of grey area in between. You have your own interpretation where one ends and another begins and that's fine. One man's "fuck doll" is another's "meh". I don't find the Scarlett pose that qualitatively different from the male poses.  So I'm going to have to repeat what Brian said, and politely disagree with you on this topic, Dorkman. When it came to the Looper discussion on the equivalence of killing a child with killing an innocent adult, I agreed with you on that point, against most others who were arguing there was a difference.

That's just a function of over-saturation. They're awesome songs for the first 300 listens. But enough already. Which is not the song's fault. If Megan Fox and Scarlett Johansson were begging you for threesomes every hour of the day, you'd get sick of it after the first few years. Not them again. Leave me alone.

Phwoar. Nice bike!
(I like how the bloke in the back is totally oblivious)

The mistake in all this discussion is assuming that what works for men (in regards to viewing women as sexy) also applies to women (in viewing men as sexy). Sexiness to a man is primarily about looks (youth, slimness, symmetry, health, fitness). Men don't care as much about the woman's social status, income, job, brain, etc. Women, on the other hand, have physical appearance as only one of many attributes. Consider it on a points-system where different attributes are weighted. Let's say anything over 100 points is deemed 'sexy'. For men, almost all the points come from the woman's looks: 20 points for long legs, 20 points for large eyes & lips, 20 points for hair, 20 points for flawless skin, 20 points for perky breasts, etc. For women, it may only be 30% weighted to men's looks, the rest coming from social status, wit, intelligence, leadership, humour, extroversion/confidence, positive outlook, etc. That's why withered old men can still get hot chicks because they make up the points in other areas. It doesn't work the other way around.

So equating sexualization of characters based solely on poses or revealing costumes is not a fair comparison.

That movie is so frigg'n slow. I had to watch it on 2X speed and it still felt long.

I knew a 38 year old bloke with Star Wars posters up in his pad, but chicks don't dig a man-child, so he took them down. Classic slacker plot-line (e.g. Ted)