76

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saw some stuff this week, brace yourselves. Gold rating is the IMDB score.



Need for Speed (2014) - 5/10 (7.0)

http://gradwolf.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/nfs.jpg
Lllllllllllllllladies...

Video-game based, completely braindead plot, don't even think about it. Aaron Paul is a guy who needs to race in an illegal street race for some reason. Whatever. The game probably made as much sense.
Several cringe-inducing moments.
Still, I was able to shut my brain off, and to be fair the cinematography is great overall, camera work during car chases is great, and the soundmix and design is pretty darn spectacular. Haven't heard car engines sound this nice in any movie probably.
It's probably a 3/10, but I saw it on a good day so I'm feeling generous.




Casino (1995) - 8/10 (8.2)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4J0rgJVt0dc/T16-UrhTz-I/AAAAAAAAEGU/2Dyq_H0YHDI/s1600/Casino+1.jpg

Hadn't really seen it before. Realized how much this reminds me of "Wolf Of Wall Street". De Niro plays a guy who gets up in the world as a Casino owner in Vegas. Things predictable take a turn for the worse at some point.
Great, really great acting by all involved (Joe Pesci in particular is fantastic to me, as is Sharon Stone), lots of narration over on-screen action and great editing. So much of this film is set to music and it helps the 3 hours really fly by, there's a rhythm to the film almost always that makes it roll along.




Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Director's Cut) (1977) - 8/10 (7.7)

http://imgur.com/mABpTIg.jpg

Hadn't seen it before, only a scene here or there. Overall it's great, the entire movie is a slow buildup to the final 4th of the film. At several times during the film I was in awe of the cinematography and effects. Simply gorgeous throughout.
The characters kind of get a bit lost at the end in the grandeur of everything else happening, but it's still a very nice film, although probably not as thematically strong as you'd perhaps expect from Spielberg. It's more a straight line from beginning to end, as opposed to a movie that sets up themes and ideas early and then reinforces them or reincorporates them into later decisions or events.




Tim's Vermeer (2013) (Documentary) - 8/10 (7.9)

http://img.moviepilot.com/assets/tarantulaV2/project_images/1389091943_tims_vermeer-oo.jpg

Thanks for the recommendation Teague. This documentary was great, like a really long Mythbusters episode. Never had much of an interest in art but this was more about the science behind it, which was fascinating.




Dear Mr. Gacy (2010) - 8/10 (6.5)

http://s017.radikal.ru/i411/1307/eb/392a71e93ba9.png

Based on a true story apparently. A student writes convicted serial killer John Wayne Gacy in prison, trying to get into his mind and find out more about his crimes, of which Gacy officially still claimed he was innocent. Not sure how much is true to the real events but the relationship with the convicted serial killer quickly spirals out of control, and you wouldn't think there was that much to fear from a guy in jail. Also you start wondering where the interest in the serial killer from the main character really comes from.
Seen some comparisons to Silence of The Lambs, and DMG does feel a bit like if SotL only focused on Sterling and Lecter. Definitely worth checking out.




The Ledge (2011) - 7/10 (6.6)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rSa4YRF-yLA/ToAzTTjdFcI/AAAAAAAACR8/VUNcPbI98CA/s1600/The%2BLedge%255B2011%255DLIMITED%2BBRRip%2BXviD-ExtraTorrentRG.avi_002205244.jpg

Overall I enjoyed it. Charlie Hunnam (Sons Of Anarchy) stands on a ledge ready to jump, as he tells a cop the backstory to him being there. He's an non-believer who falls for his christian neighbors wife, and starts trying to flirt with her.

If you've seen "The Man From Earth", The Ledge feels a bit like that, where the movie was the project of a writer who focused mainly on the script. The flms deals with theology and belief and non-belief, though it doesn't really make any solid, well-conveyed points in the end
The characters do, at times, feel a bit... flat... I wanna say. Like the actors perhaps don't really have that much material to sculpt them into fully fleshed out characters. It also feels a bit too safe throughout, like we know it's building to a specific point of Hunnam being where he is, so there isn't as much tension as there is potential for. The movie would probably have been better off if it scrapped the framing device of the jumper and the cop, though there is a reason for it being there aswell.
I really like Patrick Wilson, and he, as the christian husband to Liv Tylers wife, has a fantastic section in the film where he outclasses everyone else in the movie in skill.




The Presence (2010) - 4/10 (4.5)

http://new-films.biz/uploads/posts/2012-08/1344967043_prisutstvie-3.jpg

"The Shining" in slow motion. Girlfriend and boyfriend alone in wooden cottage, spirits influence their psyche in bad ways.
Didn't do much for me unfortunately. More psychological drama than anything really.




Behind The Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2006) - 7/10 (6.8)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-77nlUirTihY/UIqDkFIVSMI/AAAAAAAABCo/XKx2kjZLIaM/s1600/Picture+5.png

Considering the great reception "Cabin In The Woods" got, this movie, released before it, really deserves alot more attention. Shot on a very small budget apparently. It dissects the tropes of horror films and explains the conventions in a very meta way.
The premise of the movie is that all the classic movie killers and cities are real, like Mike Myers, Freddie Krueger, etc, and are treated as actual people who live in the world of the film.
Now a student sets out to find and interview a legend in their town, Leslie Vernon. As it turns out he decides to allow them to tag along and document the behind the scenes of a killer in these movies. Along the way we meet retired killers, find out various techniques for creating the situations one often faults cheap horror films for, and our crew starts getting more and more moral qualms about them documenting the work of a killer.

I really do recommend it, the style of the film will probably seem at first a bit cheap and juvenile once we meet Leslie and there are some, probably intentionally, cringey attempts at comedy, but once you realize the tone they are going for, it's a very endearingly made film. There's also a bit more than meets the eye.




Ils (Them) (2006) - 5/10 (6.5)

http://outnow.ch/Media/Movies/Bilder/2006/Ils/movie.ws/03.jpg

Seen this horror/home invasion film before many years ago. It doesn't really hold up unfortunately, I spent the majority of it berating the two main characters, in peril from attackers in their secluded Romanian home, for seemingly making as much noise as possible when hiding from people.
There are worse home invasion films, but this one, although at times very effective, is ultimately frustrating and not really anything new at all. It does get points for an almost perfect buildup however.

77

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Herc wrote:

Well, shit. I finally saw Amadeus. And was hugely surprised by its tone and accessibility. I was completely expecting something stuffy and pompous, but it's really just a good story that is solidly executed, with a world and characters that genuinely feel real (and modern). I'm impressed, and I will no doubt be revisiting it at some point in the future.
If you've put off seeing it for one reason or another, give it a go. I think the only complaint is the run-time, so just watch it when you're in the mood for a film of that length. Thumbs up though.


I saw Amadeus in school, quite young. I always have a weird feeling with those types of films just for that reason. It's not the most fun first association to have with a film.

For that matter, why does teacher and schools seemingly insist on showing really artsy films to young people. Surely introductions to film or film education is best done with more mainstream films, to make sure there is a more geniune interest there to begin with. I saw The Royal Tenenbaums in school aswell, another film I have that weird type of relationship with for that reason.

That said, need to see Amadeus again, pretty sure I'd adore most of it at this point in life.

"Tim's Vermeer" was excellent. Sort of like a special, slightly more sophisticated Mythbusters episode, with Adam and Jamie melded into one person possessing both the facial hair and ruggedness of Jamie and the charisma and wit of Adam.

Great watch, very interesting.

I always periodically forget the genius of The Onion, and always love it when I'm reminded:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9d09JLBVRc

80

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Of all the phrases one could use to describe Clue...highly regarded... is not one of them.

Looking at the IMDb rating and rotten tomatoes audience score I got the impression it's a bit of a classic in terms of comedies from the 80s. To be fair I didn't really see why it is that highly scored though, but I guess alot of people born in the late 70s will perhaps have grown up with it and have a soft spot for it.

81

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Some recent random stuff.



Noah (2014) - 8/10 (6.3)

http://blogs-images.forbes.com/scottmendelson/files/2014/03/25146848.jpeg

I might have a soft spot for Aronofsky, but this really impressed me. it takes the, in my opinion, silly subject matter and turns it into a compelling story which focuses on the human experience of the event it describes. Certain aspects are a bit underdeveloped, but the actors really seem to give it their all, the direction is focused and understated, and the score from Clint Mansell is hypnotic and thematically moody. Russell Crowe in particular seems as focused as ever and is the highlight of the film for me.
Very recommended. Not as thematically neat and tidy as some of Aronofskys other films, but it's firing on quite alot of cylinders.



Intruders (2011) - 5/10 (5.4)

http://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/1_intruders_courtesy_of_millennium_entertainment.jpg

Clive Owen in horror about a family terrorized by a strange presence. Sounds familiar, and it is. Not bad, but unfortunately didn't have any lasting impressions on me. I've already for gotten most of it.




Transcendence (2014) - 5/10 (6.4)

http://static2.hypable.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/transcendence-poster-feature.jpg

Wally Pfisters directorial debut, and a big "meh" from me. Not bad, but after an hour I looked at the clock and lamented the hour remaining of it. It's really lethargic in tempo and quite frankly emotional intensity from the case in general, and the aspect of AI and the implications of it have been dealt with in better detail before, making that aspect feel pretty stale. What's left is a standard-feeling Hollywood thriller with no bite.
Watch "Her" if you already haven't, that delves deep into the interesting aspects of AI this movie barely grazes.




Dorian Gray (2009) - 5/10 (6.3)

http://rebzombie.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dorian-gray.jpg

TV-drama-feeling movie based on the novel by Oscar Wilde. Man is nice, man gets magical portait of himself which ages instead of himself, but also shows his increasingly ugly soul.
Nicely filmed and costumes are great. Colin Firth unexpectedly has a big part and is as good as ever. The rest of it all doesn't offend, but feels a bit like a teen novel made for TV.

Mostly harmless.




High Crimes (2002) - 6/10 (6.3)

http://kinoplay.rv.ua/uploads/posts//1286129892_3.jpg

90s thriller, only made in 2002. Freeman and Ashley Judd star as lawyers trying to clear her husband of murder charges in the military.
Has some similarities to "Basic", the 2003 John McTiernan film also about a criminal investigation in the military.
Competently made, well acted, a bit twisty, and ultimately comfortably familiar to other 90s thrillers. Definitely worth checking out for fans of the genre in general.




Clue (1985) - 6/10 (7.4)

http://screencapped.net/movie/c/albums/clue/normal_clue1985-1393.jpg

Quirky comedy based on the "Clue" boardgame, dinner guests need to solve a crime while all being potential suspects. Quite highly regarded, but as someone seeing it for the first time now, it feels a bit dated and the comedy is at times slightly stiff. Still charming, tempo picks up more and more as the movie progresses, and Tim Curry has a big role. Who doesn't like them some Tim Curry?

82

(127 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ewing wrote:
Teague wrote:

Fun fact, because of you sorry goddamned assholes, we're doing an intermission this weekend called PLOT HOLE FILM CRITICISM.

Didn't you already record a commentary for Prometheus?

Ouch. I felt that burn all the way to Sweden.

83

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Under the Skin (2013) - 7/10 (7.2)

http://500.the400club.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/under-the-skin.jpg

Really unsettling, psychedelic and minimal thriller, not much can be said without spoiling. Scarlett Johansson is excellent in it, and the film is very much in the "art" section as far as symbolism and cinematography is concerned. If you thought "Only God Forgives" was inaccessible this is probably not for you. Mostly sexual in both over and undertones, drab, bleak.




Rambo 1-3 (1982 - 1988)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4DTM1Pk9zQY/UQuji31y6OI/AAAAAAAAJB8/1FOJ6-AJ0qo/s1600/LRA_stallone_first_blood_1.JPG

Seeing these again really shows Stallone and his abilities as an actor, aswell as the many levels to the character of John Rambo. The plot in all films are pretty bare-bones by modern standards, but the execution and editing still holds up very well. Jerry Goldsmiths music is absolutely superb. Rambo II in particular has an awesome soundtrack, both gentle and at several points kinetically majestic and driving.




Enemy 2013 - 7/10 (6.9)

http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Enemy-Gyllenhaal.jpg

Denis Villeneuve (Prisoners) most recent film. It's very different from Prisoners, much of the film is an exercise in how little you can give an audience and still create an engrossing experience. Works pretty much only on hidden layers and the obvious plot is almost nonexistant. Jake Gyllenhaal does great work as a man who finds a seemingly identical copy of himself in a movie.
Very hard to predict, great cinematography.




Idiocracy 2006 - 7/10 (6.5)

http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/idiocracy.jpg

Mike Judge made this little comedy film about an average man who is frozen and thawed out in the future, a la Futurama, only to discover that the human race has become so dumb that he has become the smartest person on the planet.
Overall it feels like a small movie, but it doesn't feel cheap in most cases, other than some matte paintings and CGI which feels like it might have come from an episode of Beavies and Butthead rather than a Hollywood movie.
If you like South Park and that style of humor, this one is probably worth your time.

84

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Aural Stimulation wrote:

Saw EDGE OF TOMORROW.

Loved it, loved it, loved it.

Is it the most original movie ever? God, no. But I so don't fucking care.

I've been considering seeing it, even had tickets reserved but ended up not going. How did you feel about recent stuff like Elysium, Amazing SpiderMan 2, or similar films? Just trying to figure out if my tastes match yours. smile

85

(116 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i.imgur.com/Fth7P1p.jpg

Been enjoying these VSonic GR07 Classic Ed. IEMs for 3-ish months, and just recently got a maroon-colored 2nd pair as a backup. Sonically they're crisply textured and beautifully balanced, 100$ from lendmeurears.com with free worldwide shipping. I've got a pair of full-size $300+ Beyerdynamic DT880s for my desk, and the GR07s are a great complement to them, which is saying alot.

86

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

Huh, I haven't actually seen anything else by Neil Marshall...

...except apparently the 2 episodes of Game of Thrones he did, that are both epic battle episodes and okay, yeah, that totally makes sense. I'm gonna have to check out more of his stuff, The Descent has been on my radar for a while, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

The Descent is one of my favourite horror films of the past years. It hit the right spots for me, and, I guess, skirted the boundaries of generic horror, yet it always has some quality that keeps it interesting and very tense. Really recommend it as a well above-average horror film.

87

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Hidden Face (La Cara Oculta) (2011) - 7/10 (7.3)

http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i461/gokbiloz/ARNTMKV/e01da373.jpg

Very good Spanish film. The girlfriend of an orchestra conductor disappears and it goes from there. Not too much should be said about it. It does twist and turn a bit. Very well acted by most everyone involved. Very recommended if you like thrillers.




The Jacket (2005) - 6/10 (7.1)

http://static.yts.re/attachments/The_Jacket_2005/Screenshot_007_large.png

"Jacobs Ladder" meets "Donnie Darko". An injured soldier (Adrien Brody) is put in a mental hospital after an incident, and while there he is subjected to treatment that cause strange events.
Fairly derivative plot (you can tell what movies the writer watched and was inspired by), and despite being normal length, it's not as "rich" in tone and content as Jacobs Ladder or Donnie Darko. Still, good acting and emotionally the movie still connected with me very well. Worth seeing in most cases.

88

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

redxavier wrote:

Taken 2
http://thecrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/taken2-bryan-mills.jpg

I'm a big fan of the 'Liam Neeson kills people/animals' genre and I'm also a fan of watching bad things happen to bad people, and this film does both very well. I had been warned that it wasn't as good as the first, so perhaps these lowered expectations and the wariness on my part helped, but I loved this.

Bryan Mills is also the closest that we've come to getting a proper Frank Castle on screen.


Personally I can't stand that film. I love "Taken" (solid 8/10 for me, no nonsense, just bad-ass), but Taken 2 was one of my biggest disappointments of last year together with Die Hard 5.
Just the fact that they after the fact decided to go PG-13 rather than R meant that all action scenes are cut to shreds. It doesn't help that action scenes overall are some of the least competent in recent years. The first film has superb action scenes, a relaxed cutting tempo, and a good sense of geography.

"Taken" and "Taken 2" are for me similar to "Casino Royale" and "Quantum of Solace" for me. One is a excellently choreographed and shot action movie, the other is a 3-cuts-a-second mess where there is no effort made to allow you to anticipate a move/situation/action. It's just a flurry of tight shots, and after watching a sequence you really couldn't draw a crude diagram of what happened to save your life.


Same with Die Hard 5, that opening 10 minute car chase is one of the worst put together action scenes I've ever seen.

EDIT: Aaaand they're filming "Taken 3" with Olivier Megaton back in the directors chair... Let's hope they learned from their mistakes.

89

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You know, I will have to agree that Tom Cruise is a pretty darn good example, other than the true legends like Jackie Chan and other stunt/actor combinations.

Tom Cruise gives it his all. Thanks to this I've never been able to dislike him despite his kooky personal beliefs. You'll see Cruises character fall awkwardly down some stairs and just as you think "that stunt man must be really sore", nope, Tom Cruises face pops out from the mess of a person at the bottom of the stairs.

90

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Might have been posted before, but this short animated video is awesome on every conceivable level, 2 pilots engaged in a dogfight used as an illustration of hate and losing your humanity.

91

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Basic (2003) - 6/10 (6.5)

http://i.imgur.com/793wP79.png

I realized I hadn't seen some John McTiernan films. This one was a fairly straight thriller, with quite a twisty plot involving John Travolta trying to figure out the events of a miltary incident. Well-acted, well-shot, but not really all too eye-catching either. If you like thrillers it probably couldn't hurt to see it.




The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) - 7/10 (6.8)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fA0UzO93I20/UEUZZgiQhkI/AAAAAAAAD2M/C7la1c2JK-8/s1600/600full-the-thomas-crown-affair-screenshot.jpg

This McTiernan film is slightly more light-hearted, a female police-of-sorts (Rene Russo) goes after a suspected gentleman art thief (Brosnan). Has some of the same city energy McTiernan used in Die Hard 3, a quite charming movie overall which isn't too heavy on plot. Feels a bit Soderberg "Out Of Sight" or "Oceans Eleven" in a way.




The Cave (2005) - 5/10 (5.0)

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/3074/vlcsnap2011063023h46m01.png

To describe it quickly; "The Descent" light. "The Cave" came out 2 years before the superior "companion" piece, and it isn't as focused as the tense, constricted Neil Marshall cave exploration flick. Some unnecessary and hokey-feeling subplots get in the way of what could be a pretty good 60 minute horror film.
A cave is discovered, bad stuff is in it, group dynamics come into play. You've seen it before, though it isn't completely ineffective, thankfully devoid of teenagers and quite inclusive of a gorgeous Lena Heady.




Non-Stop (2014) 5/10 (7.2)

http://www.movpins.com/big/MV5BNDU1MTMxMzQxMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDY1MjgxMTE/still-of-liam-neeson-in-non-stop-(2014).jpg

Liam Neeson thriller set on a flight from New York to London. All elements within are familiar, some of it feels a bit too familiar at times. The element of mystery keeps it interesting until the end, though alot of tension is dissipated due to an implausibly omniscient villain.
Kind of an amalgamation of "Red Eye", "Flightplan", "Executive Decision" and probably some other airplane films. I suppose there is a limitate palette to work with in that environment.



Godzilla (2014) - 6/10 (7.3)

http://www.theeffect.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/godzilla_2014.png

I don't know. This rating will probably drop a bit if I see it again. It's pretty forgettable unfortunately, there is no strong throughline that you can be invested in, it moves from scene to scene but it mostly only has a semblance of any emotional core.
Effects are awesome though, and like Pacific Rim they get the scale of huge things just right. Watching it as a collection of very well-directed individual scenes can work. Trying to invest anything beyond that will probably leave you unsatisfied.

92

(3 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hope they get them both.

93

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

Great choice of movie, saw it for the first time a short while back and overall really enjoyed it. Can't wait to hear you guys talk about it.

Does anyone, maybe Teague, know how long the video in the OP of the stream will be available? Are you going to keep it uploaded to your channel or is it only temporarily saved and automatically deleted after some time?

94

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Cloverfield I have to agree with. I gave it an 8/10 after seeing it in theaters, and that score did reflect my initial impression from the biggest room at my local cinema.
Subsequent viewings does show it to be a pretty thin movie, and it doesn't really flow as organically as it could. Still for me a 6.5/10, I can't dislike it more.

The 2 biggest changes I've made personally are Mulholland Dr and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Mulholland Dr in particular went from an honest 3/10 when I saw it 2006-ish (1 of those points being solely for Angelo Badalamentis score), to a true 10/10 when I saw it again some 5 years later. The interim movie experience aswell as just being 5 years older and having further been exposed to different aesthetics and themes made that 2nd viewing a home run for me, a truly moving, haunting piece of visual and auditory beauty.

95

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013) - 7/10 (7.4)

http://i.imgur.com/EE12bb5.jpg

Very enjoyable film by Ben Stiller about a gentle and quiet man who sets out on a journey. A simple story with a hard-to-resist combination of comedy and drama, and an overall very positive and uplifting tone that makes you feel good at the end of it. Good song selection and some very excellent photography from some exotic locations.
Very simple and in a sense very clichéd script that you can probably guess the outcome of from scene 1, but generally each scene is directed with a very steady hand and a great sense for comedic timing and genuine-feeling interactions between characters.
It held my interest and made me feel for the characters despite not necessarily having alot on the page to work with. Well done Mr Stiller.




Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit (2014) - 6/10 (6.3)

http://i.imgur.com/EpREyKs.jpg

My brother compared this to "The Bourne Legacy" in terms of how it seems quite forgettable (and how I can't help thinking of Jason Bourne in general, though it's not quite the same type of focus story-wise). It's a decently interesting story about tensions between Russia and America and a terrorist plot, and Chris Pine is fine as an injured soldier recruited by the CIA and sent to Moscow to uncover said plot. But the movie doesn't have the same level of intricacy of your Mission:Impossibles, the sought-after Mcguffin device is an "algorithm" (yawn...), and it's not really smart enough to engage you in any deeper political intrigue. Overall every plot device has been done many times before, and it feels like the filmmakers didn't add the necessary flair and finesse to make it stand out. There's very little texture overall at display.




You're Next (2011) - 4/10 (6.5)

http://blog.rottencotton.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/1364894227_you_re_next-oo9.jpg

Slasher film. Family gathering turns bloody after unknown assailants attack their home. I felt this was below par, and the movies claims of being a dark comedy went straight past me, once or twice I chuckled but the movie doesn't cohesively move you in that direction, and the characters just ended up being really weird and off-putting since their sometimes weird antics or reactions clash with the more dead serious score and camerawork and your common-denominator scare tactics.
It's got a generally good reception for a slasher film overall, but I don't see it myself. I mean, the killers take the time to write "You're Next" with blood on the wall. That's the type of film it is, just replace your standard horror film teenagers with adults, but keep the rest as-is. If you've seen any horror film before, you know exactly what to expect. Either watch something aimed squarely at horror like the French home invasion movie "Ils" ("Them") from 2006, or just go for "Tucker and Dale vs Evil" or "Cabin in The Woods" if you want a genuinely clever blend of horror and comedy in various ratios.




The French Connection (1971 )- 7/10 (7.8)

http://www.standbyformindcontrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/French-Connection-Signature-Series-BD_05.jpg?d44b86

Convincingly gritty and down-to-earth, almost documentary-feeling film about some cops investigating a smuggling case. Lots of street surveillance, tailing, and stake-outs.
Worth seeing if you're fairly young like me as a time-capsule of early 70s New York. Relaxed and airy atmosphere.




In Bruges (2008) - 8/10 (8.0)

http://cinephilefix.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/in-bruges.jpg

Very original story and structure, hard to predict and very well-acted by Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson and Ralph Fiennes, among others. Overall very enjoyable and with a surprising depth of character for a stylish crime drama, somewhat in the style of "Snatch" or "Lock, Stock..." but with other layers over.
Director Martin McDonagh also recently did "Seven Psychopaths" which I even enjoyed slightly more, also an intriguing structure and plot to that one.

96

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Saniss wrote:

Well, I watched Her yesterday night and I've got to agree with pretty much everything TechNoir said. What a beautiful, beautiful movie. Joaquin Phoenix is exceptional.

Yeah, the one word I'd also chose to describe it is "beautiful". Cool that someone found similar thoughts about it. smile

97

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Her (2013) - 10/10

http://i.imgur.com/TJStm6l.jpg

Holy hell. I don't dole out perfect scores often, but here I have no choice.
A beautifully written script which manages to be very intimate while also effortlessly weaving in themes of existentialism, humanity, technology, and love.
THE most steady directing hand I've seen in years and years. The precision in each scene and the way they flow into each other is incredible.
The acting is superb, everything is just so human, while not falling into complete naturalism.
The score works perfectly in guiding emotion and I never felt like it was forcing something on me that wasn't already present in me from the moment I was watching, the cinematography is exceptional, the editing reaches Malick-ian levels of freeflowing beauty at times.

Throughout this film I just kept wanting it to end just so that it wouldn't take a wrong turn and ruin what was a perfect ride. But it just kept going and going and going, and in the end I couldn't do anything but completely surrender to it.

Fuck yes, this movie.

98

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thirded, since I am interested in the thoughts behind the rating pretty much always. Doesn't need to be long at all, just a summary of what you thought of it (though I always find more detailed thoughts entertaining and interesting).

99

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Fassbender is great in "12 years" aswell.

100

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Challenger Disaster (2013) -  7/10 (7.5)

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02513/feynman_2513082b.jpg

Nice BBC Production of Richard Feynman and his involvement with the aftermath of the Challenger Space Shuttle explosion in the 80s (based on his book). Pretty simple layout, but the simple "one man finding the truth" structure works well and keeps your interest. William Hurt is great as Feynman.

Just a nice little 90 minute movie which dramatizes the events.




Frozen (2013) - 5/10 (7.9)

http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2014/03/14/869/n/24155406/c74d513e7488ef52_Main.jpg.xxxlarge/i/Signs-Your-Child-Loves-Frozen.jpg

I really like Tangled. I did not like this. Character motivations are unclear mostly, things happen because they need to get forward in the plot. Some characters are pointless for the story, and overall just a really dull, bleak landscape and atmosphere throughout. Nothing like Tangled and the more vivid, lush surroundings and atmosphere.

The songs are good on their own for the most part I suppose, but they don't really fit into the movie either. Muddled and uninteresting overall for me.




Memories of Murder (Salinui chueok) (2003) - 8/10 (8.1)

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q80/trungcang/h4/mom_screen_05.png~original

From the director of "The Host". This was a great film, sort of reminiscent of "Zodiac" with it following some police officers tracking a serial killer.
Nothing really truly outstanding about it, it's just well made, well acted, and always has something interesting going on, sometimes bordering on absurdist or darkly humorous.

Nice cinematography. Very recommended, probably will not disappoint at all if you're into the general genre.




Cosmopolis (2012) - 6/10 (5.0)

http://www.yuppee.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Cosmopolis-stills-cosmopolis-31750511-1198-800.jpg

Overall I liked it. Based on a book it seems, and the film does feel like a theater play or such, it being limited to just a few locations, one of which is a limousine the main character uses to get to a hair dressers.

The film very quickly in the beginning slows down to very slow tempo, minimal sounddesign and just two people in a car talking very heavily about subjects, so it took me a while to fall into the pace of the movie. Once I did though about 20-25 minutes in it kept my interest fairly well. Paul Giamatti shows up at the end so if you like him you'll probably be happy, he does a great job.

Again, theatrical and very "overwritten", but I'd say give it 30 minutes and see if you start to sync with it.