976

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm gonna come out and say that I don't think remakes are necessarily a bad thing. Three of my favorite films -- THE THING, THE FLY, and BODY SNATCHERS '79 -- are remakes, and improve upon the original in significant ways.

A lot of remakes are unnecessary, but what movie -- recent or not -- do you think could benefit from a remake, not just to make a quick buck but because there's unmined potential there of some kind? And, as a corollary (or maybe the whole reason to have it remade) -- who do you want to see do it?

Be prepared to make your case. If you say GHOSTBUSTERS you'd better have a damn fine argument and a hell of a director in mind.

Me, I'd like to see a new version of MORTAL KOMBAT, with either Prachya Pinkaew or Tony Jaa (the ONG BAK guys) at the helm. Give the flick some Eastern, contemplative flavor, while still getting a violence-riddled film befitting the original violent video game. Hook them up with an experienced VFX supervisor to help them get their bearings with the CG and I bet we'd see shit with Scorpion, Sub-Zero and Goro that'd blow our goddamn minds.

977

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

And when we try to stay on topic with the movie and not let conversations wander, other listeners complain because we're stifling interesting conversation that they want to hear more about.

For my part, I think it's usually ideal to bring the conversation back to the film, if there's something to be said in particular about that film at that moment; but at the same time we've all been trying lately not to interrupt each other as much as before because folks in the forum were complaining about that, too.

978

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

I didn't miss the connection, I just don't actually do Ghostbusters references. I figure, if you know Ghostbusters, the reference goes without saying. And if you don't, we can't be friends.

979

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

980

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

981

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

982

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

983

(25 replies, posted in Episodes)

In PIRATES 2, whenever the guy with the hermit crab head starts speaking in Cantonese, the subtitles declare it "gibberish."

984

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

Of course he is. Because he's a person, not a Movie Hero, and people in crazy situations can act stupid and panicky and aren't going to always make smart choices in the moment. He's doing his best without having any idea what to do because he's never had to be a hero before and didn't even intend to start now. Which ultimately is what, IMO, makes him heroic. Not that he's good at it, but he never abandons trying when he realizes no one else is going to do it.

985

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The plot of the movie is dinosaurs running amok in the park, clearly unsupervised. So within the world of the film the Dinosaur Supervisor is not doing his job.

/explain-o-tron

986

(21 replies, posted in Episodes)

987

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Shit, I say we do all three. At that point if we lose a commentary, we're doing it on purpose.

988

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

989

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just to let everyone know, I've managed to find amid the Audacity temp files (which I got from Teague), and am starting to piece together, what we got of the KICK-ASS commentary. This will still happen.

The actual recording died just after Trey said "She's too young, she's fine," and I think it was somehow my doing when I leaned back to take my niece from my sister, so literally you'll want to download and archive this specific moment right here, and the audio can go crappy for about 30 seconds in the middle of the commentary with the Justin.tv audio, and we can pick it up in the second-half recording whenever we do that.

990

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

991

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

It has both. I saw the original and I borrowed your copy to do it.

992

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

993

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

994

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

995

(36 replies, posted in Off Topic)

996

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'll do Children of Men as well.

997

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Aw, lookit LOST WORLD all alone up there. It's giving me the sad eyes, I'll take the little guy home.

998

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just as a note, while it'll be great to have timecodes for funny bits, make sure to take note of especially interesting/insightful moments of commentary. Part of what this video is for is to show at a glance how we're different from something like Rifftrax, and the main difference is that we actually engage with (most) movies rather than just cracking jokes.

999

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think my favorite recent insight is Brian talking about the purpose of telling a story, and how some movies you can't tell what that purpose is. Specifically the example he gives "I could give you a three hour lecture on the importance of credibility -- or I can tell you the three-minute story of the boy who cried wolf and get the same point across, and probably more clearly." Or words to that effect. I don't remember the first commentary he mentioned that in, and it actually might not even have been released yet...

I liked FixedR6's suggestion. We've got probably, what, 20 consistent regulars here? Everyone take 5 commentaries, we can do this in a week.

1,000

(142 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It was CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS, and unfortunately that conversation occurred during the intro, before we started the movie, so wouldn't work for the purposes of this video.