1,001

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That might be the thickest Aussie accent I've ever heard.

1,002

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://www.zarban.com/pics/just-an-internet.jpg

The fact that the first shot says "Entracte" and that it's in the middle of the film and features music means it has all the hallmarks of an intermission, but it's nothing you'd want to duck out on to take a leak. That was amazing.

Jimmy B wrote:

Science action figures anyone?

They could have used a few more women in there. Temple Grandin? Dian Fossey? Jane Goodall? Anna Freud? Karen Horney? Florence Nightingale? Christmas Jones?

The Ladykillers (1955) is probably the most famous of the Ealing comedies made in the decade after WW2 by Britain's Ealing Studios. The Coen Brothers moved the story to the American South in a remake (2004).

In both versions, a gang of crooks rents space with an elderly lady by pretending to be classical musicians. But they are actually planning a robbery that she will unwittingly play an important part in. She ultimately discovers the truth, and they have to decide whether and how to live up to the title of the film.

The original stars Alec Guinness with fat-period Peter Sellers and a few less familiar (to me) faces. It's a good slice of British comedy, but feels rather arch and stagy to me. (I've got half an eye on Sullivan's Travels at the moment, and despite the fact that Joel McCrea and Veronica Lake would do well to play convincing mannequins, it feels sleek and precise.) The laughs are more Carry On... scale than Pythonesque, and the editing often feels clumsy and choppy. The characters are great, but the acting is lacking from everyone but Guinness and Herbert Lom (Inspector Clouseau's boss in the Pink Panther films). Who would have thought that Peter Sellers would underplay an aging Teddy boy Cockney crook? There's a bit too much climbing about on roofs, and the central caper itself is a little underwhelming, but it's fairly clever and not bad action for time.

On the whole, the film feels rather small and intimate and perfectly likeable, but also clunky. The Ealing comedies were known for their light satire, and it's this that makes it work to the degree it does.

The remake looks and sounds absolutely gorgeous (the Coens use gospel this time), but I felt it was kind of baffling and kept missing opportunities. Their old lady is better (the highlight of the film, really), but the crooks are mostly unfunny caricatures. I actually did like Tom Hanks' demented Colonel Sanders bit, despite the fact that he's so weird I thought he might be a ghost or something. JK Simmons and the others are fine, but Marlon Wayons is completely out of place. The expanded cast (a crook's girlfriend, the casino manager, and the sheriff) aren't used enough that they pay off. George Wallace as the sheriff is so good he really ought to have an early morning, low-speed chase with the crooks' hearse in which he's forced to let them go because they do indeed have a corpse in the coffin: the dead accomplice they're disposing of. Their very CRIME is their SALVATION. (Look, a theme!)

On the whole, the film feels smooth and almost grand, but also mushy. The Coens seem to have missed the satire of the original and replaced it with crass swearing and toilet humor. (Which is strange because Raising Arizona DID strike just that Ealing tone of light satire and works very well partly because of it.)

1,006

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

bullet3 wrote:

Now David Fincher, who's being rumoured now, would knock it out of the park. Man's a perfectionist ....

The problem with perfectionists is that they go down the wrong path at pretty much the same rate as non-perfectionists. They just drive everyone crazy while they do.

Fincher is hit-and-miss with me. I love a lot of Kubrick stuff, but not because of his perfectionism. And I adore Hitchcock's stuff in spite of his not being a perfectionist.

I say Steven Spielberg is the obvious choice. Indiana Jones 5 should be shelved.

1,007

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague wrote:

Zarban, fun fact: I composited a bunch of those shots in that Fringe comic you posted.

Sequence didn't turn out quite the way we were hoping, but, still, it's a fun fact.

I knew there was a reason I loved you.

Other than the sex, I mean.

1,008

(6 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i397.photobucket.com/albums/pp51/InternNin/YouandIareenemiesnow.jpg

1,009

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dorkman wrote:

...a) when Louis CK does it, rape or the n-word are the butt of the joke, not the engine of it, and b) when Louis CK does it, he's funny.

I don't think Tosh's off-the-cuff heckler reply was any good, but I do think he's generally funnier than Louis CK, at least on Tosh.0. CK always seems to me to sort of try too hard to be disgusting.

Admittedly, maybe I should be comparing stand-up to stand-up and Tosh.0 to Life With Louis, but that's not how I experience them.

1,010

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Explaining Fringe would probably go the same way. I'm just finishing season 4, and the hits just keep on comin'.

http://www.zarban.com/pics/fringe-september.jpg

1,011

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Allison wrote:

And when you think about it, many of the roles in Nolan's movies could be gender bent without affecting the plot in the least.

Oh, absolutely, but that's true of MOST genre films. (Tysto has joked on some of his Schwarzenegger commentaries that Judi Dench could have played Arnie's role; he mostly just shoots people.)

I like Nolan's movies. He's just not helping genre cinema be very diverse. I think probably the same kind of list could be made of ethnic minority characters. Somehow, there are more Chinese and black people in Harry Potter's Scotland than there are in Nolan's Gotham City.

1,012

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is great. I really hope streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Instant pick this up and that they start making it a habit to make little indie films available. That should provide a modest revenue stream that just putting it on YouTube or bittorrent can't, just in case it takes off.

1,013

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

To me, good writing (outside narrative writing), means clear structure and straightforward sentences. Have a point; state it simply; support it with a few clear sentences; and move on to the next point.

A good opening should have a somewhat narrative feel, perhaps with a personal connection (explaining why you are addressing this topic now). A good conclusion should reiterate your point and summarize your case, and it should produce a slightly unexpected twist.

And it isn't Shakespeare you should emulate. It's Lincoln, Churchill, and FDR.

And Hitler, of course. Say what you will about him, the man really had a way with words.

1,014

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, no one was stopping him from including Aunt Harriet.....  tongue

http://www.bat-mania.co.uk/main/heroes/images/auntharriet_tea.JPG

Or Vicky Vale, or Chase Meridian, or Batgirl..... Oh look, other Batman film writers noticed and solved (however poorly) the problem of needing a female character who affects the plot and who isn't in league with the bad guys.  big_smile

1,015

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:
Allison wrote:

That Chris Nolan comment is frighteningly on point. I've seen every one of his movies except Memento, and I can only think of 3 women that make it through a movie alive. I'm disturbed that I never noticed this before.

Does that make him sexist, though? Think about all the men that die in his films too. It's a hell of a lot more than the amount of women who die.

No, but the fact that he writes crap female characters kind of does.

Here are ALL the named female characters in Nolan films:

  • In Memento, Sammy and Leonard's wives are dead (and actually don't have names). Natalie (Carrie-Anne Moss) betrays Leonard but also helps him in his investigation.

  • In Batman Begins, Martha Wayne is dead. Rachel Dawes does nothing but talk to Bruce about his feelings and get kidnapped. "Jessica" is a model Bruce is screwing. Barbara Gordon does nothing.

  • In The Prestige, Julia (Woverine's wife) dies tragically in act 1. Sarah (Batman's wife) kills herself in act 2 out of despair for having anything to do. Olivia (ScarJo) is secretly working for the bad guy. "Jess" is just Batman's little daughter.

  • In The Dark Knight, Rachel Dawes does nothing but talk to Bruce about his feelings and get kidnapped and killed. Officer Ramirez is secretly working for the bad guy. Barbara Gordon does nothing. "Natascha" is a ballerina Bruce is screwing. Judge Surrillo exists only to get murdered.

  • In Inception, Ariadne BENDS A CITY and is told "Never do that!" and then never does anything but talk to Cobb about his feelings. Mal is dead and still manages to betray Cobb and generally fuck with all his plans. "Phillipa" is just Cobb's little daughter.

  • In The Dark Knight Rises, Selina Kyle is secretly working for the bad guy but then helps the good guy kick some ass. Miranda is secretly working for the bad guy. "Jen" is Selina's friend (and apparently is only credited with a name to make it clear that she's not Holly "Catgirl" Robinson.)

In retrospect, I should give Nolan credit for THREE rather than two types of female characters: furniture, corpses, and betrayers. These account for all 22 of the females characters, 4 of whom kill themselves.

Meanwhile, there are a dozen or more named male characters in each film (except the low budget Memento), and they often get to have real impact on the plot even when they are minor. (Think of Postlethwaite, Berenger, and JGL in Inception; Caine and Bowie in The Prestige; and Caine, Freeman, and Oldman in the Batmovies.)

Only in Insomnia, the one film Nolan directed but didn't write, does the female lead get to be a good guy all the way thru and come out on top. Plus there are several other named female characters.

1,016

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Allison wrote:

Do you think that when this generation of movie goers starts making movies we'll get better characters?

Yes, but not by much. In that respect, I think the perception of Joss Whedon as a feminist is more important than the characters he writes. If aspiring writers like his work and respect his outlook, some will probably succeed at fulfilling that outlook better than he does. Because, seriously, that is not even very hard.

Allison wrote:

Also, behold the inner thoughts one of Guardians of the Galaxy writers. You can taste the respect.

And did you read the comments? They all call the writer a pig. It's awesome.

OH, and Inception. I forgot Inception in that previous post. Talk about a piece a furniture... Ellen "Hard Candy" Page didn't get SHIT to do in that movie. But that's a Chris Nolan movie for you. He writes women as corpses and furniture. I bet, if you actually counted, close to half of all named female characters in Chris Nolan films are dead before the beginning of the movie and exist only in flashbacks and dreams.

1,017

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, let me clarify. The movie-going audience HAS matured since the late '70s. And even young male movie-goers today are interested in well-written female characters. So all hope is not lost. For that, I think James Cameron actually deserves a lot of credit, along with ass-kicking actresses like Milla Jovovich, Uma Thurman, Angelina Jolie, Carrie-Anne Moss, and Kate Beckinsale (yes, even she).

But somehow, Hollywood in general hasn't caught on. We still get movies like National Treasure and The Da Vinci Code and Batman Begins and Transformers, where the entire role of the female lead consists of maybe giving a clue to the male lead and then following three steps behind him for the rest of the movie.

1,018

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh I make no apologies for the crime. It involved drugs and was non-consensual, so that, Whoopie, is rape rape. His family tragedy—and even growing up a hunted, orphaned Jew in WW2 Poland—don't do much to change that.

He clearly deserved prison time, and the girl's lawyer agreed to probation only to avoid more trauma. But the judge was going to renege on the plea bargain to look tough in the press and throw the book at him.

Given that the victim feels he's suffered enough, I think it's pointless to act like Polanski deserves more than 35 years of punishment as an outcast and fugitive (albeit one with a mansion).

1,019

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Consider watching Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired. Creep, yes (he also had a relationship with an underage Nastassja Kinski), but a creep who tried to get right with the victim and the law and got jerked around.

And it's not like Polanski is the only creep who ever made a movie.

I don't think I've ever seen anything but isolated clips of French & Saunders, but I've long been well aware of them. Big fan of Ab Fab, tho. Poor little Saffy....

EDIT: I've seen a bit of Vicar of Dibley, tho. Seemed fine, but not my cuppa.

1,021

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You know who's really good at writing for women? Women.

There used to be a lot of them in the US and UK film industries, mostly given outlines and asked to write the dialog. That fell apart in the 1960s when the studio system collapsed. But the female audience also collapsed, staying home and watching daytime television instead.

And by the late 1970s, the audience was quite young and mostly male, and they are not very interested in compelling female characters.

1,022

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jimmy B wrote:

Scotland is foreign, how about.......Ummmmm.....never mind.....


(I know there have been some Scottish films, I just wanted to make that joke big_smile)

Local Hero!

I'd really like hear what Eddie and Michael would have to say about that.

1,023

(216 replies, posted in Episodes)

My only disappointments were the Thor-Loki story and the precise way the heroes came together as a team.

The Thor-Loki story didn't actually follow on from Thor. I mean, they worked Coulson into the previous movies like there was this grand plan, and then they fucked up the villain for the climactic film, leaving both him and Thor in Asgard.

The team dynamic between the Avengers wasn't quite Whedonesque ENOUGH for me. Their whole storyline is about coming together as a team, but we didn't see that play out as clearly as I'd like. I would have liked 1) Stark coming to realize that Cap is a leader while he is a loner; 2) Thor realizing that Cap is his equal in heart if not brawn; 3) Banner realizing that Hulk just plain LIKES Cap; and 4) even Black Widow and Hawkeye getting some compassionate advice from Cap (re: getting the red out of their ledger) that they never got from Fury. That stuff fits with Cap finding his purpose in this strange new world of Jersey Shore and the designated hitter rule.

To make all that work, you'd need a somewhat clearer line from Loki to the final battle. Loki needs to be stopped by the helicarrier initially. Then he tricks Fury into bringing Banner on board to figure out some science, and he uses the scepter to get Banner to Hulk out and ruin the ship. The heroes all try to fight Hulk and Loki and his minions their own way and fail, and Loki escapes. Gradually, based on the stuff I mentioned above, the heroes decide that Cap is in charge. Then they go after Loki and the Chitauri as a team.

1,024

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

I like the fact that Joss provides powerful female characters but he is certainly not a feminist by any means.

I don't know if we can get so definitive in our labeling. We don't know anything about his hiring practices on set or stuff like that. And the stories he gets to put on screen have to run an obstacle course of Hollywood studio executives and marketing gurus.

I think it's safe to say that Whedon's audience skews female a lot more than Cameron's does, but to me Cameron gets the nod in terms of presenting more and better women characters who are self-motivated and self-actualizing. You may want to dismiss Rose, but she breaks out of her assigned social role and follows her heart.

Of course, that's just genre. There are a bunch of male and female movie makers who write great roles for women of various ages and who are also self-motivated and self-actualized, AND I DON'T WATCH THEM because they aren't aimed at me. I've never seen Fried Green Tomatoes or Steel Magnolias or Driving Miss Daisy or The Hours or that movie where Angelina Jolie wears a scarf on her head and doesn't kill people.

But just among directors who work in movies where people get shot and cars get blown up, Whedon and Cameron do pretty well, even if Whedon's idea of empowerment is going on a berserk killing spree and Cameron's idea of romance is a man showing a woman how to shoot a gun.

1,025

(165 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Joss Whedon is by no means a feminist icon in anyone's eyes. At least, I certainly hope not.

That was a pretty good round of applause he got from Equality Now....

I like or love a lot of his work, but I'm wary about admiring his female characters. It's especially odd that Meryl Streep introduced him in that Equality Now event, because he's never written a major part anywhere close to one she could play.

But you know who has? The writers of the last several James Bond movies.