First, the history. Before Star Wars, before Japanese SF animation as we know it, there was Space Battleship Yamato. A 26 episode series that aired in 1974, a year George Lucas has said he was in Japan watching a lot of TV, it was initially somewhat of a failure. A two and a half hour compilation movie was released the same week Japan got Star Wars, though, and beat it at the box office. Three TV series (brought to the US as Star Blazers) and five movies later, the franchise died a natural death in the early 80's.

The year is 2199. For five years, an alien race has been launching meteors at the Earth, covering it with radiation. Humans have been forced to move further and further underground, the surface now a cratered wasteland. Earth will be uninhabitable within a year. Out by Mars, the last Earth fleet is getting its butt kicked, only one ship making it home. Just as all is lost, a strange probe lands on Earth. It contains the plans for a remarkable "wave motion" engine and weapon... and a series of warp coordinates. Fitting the engine into the rebuilt hull of the World War Two battleship Yamato, the single ship and it's small fighter squad fly off to same humanity.

I will let that last sentence sink in. Yes. A WWII battleship is flying in space. If you can't just go with that, this movie will never please you. It is a "Star Wars" fantasy, before that existed. Ships "fall" when hit, there's fire and smoke in space. This version does, though, avoid having anyone stand on deck with their hair blowing in the wind.

The new movie, the first live action attempt at the story, focuses on Susumu Kodai, a former ace fighter pilot and current metal scrap collector. When his older brother dies at the Mars battle, he confronts Captain Okita, of the surviving ship, as to why his brother was used as a shield. "Sometimes," Okita tells him, "someone has to make it back." When the Yamato mission is announced, Kodai joins the crew.

There are so many ways to approach this film. I will start with the basics that many here will appreciate: this 131 minute film had a budget of US $24 million. With that in mind, it is incredible. It tells an epic tale that holds together, focusing on a few core characters. However... that budget also brings up one of the movie's biggest flaws. It feels small. The original, theatrical and TV versions, were sprawling epics. Space dogfights with dozens of fighters: the movie Yamato has six. Ground combat with a hundred marines: the movie Yamato has six on board. Japan has turned to animation for most of its SF for the simple reason their market can't support the large productions the US can, and that rears its ugly head here. We never get the sense that there is anyone on the damned ship. Oh, they try and trick us. Sets are small, so three background characters give the mess hall a sense of being full. But the real Yamato had a crew of 2,500. The movie seems to have a crew of 60. Showing a thousand charging aliens doesn't make up for this, and in fact only makes the combat less satisfying.

Adaptation wise, they do a good job bringing the story to a new century. Certain characters are turned female, although keeping the same personality (a drunk doc is a drunk doc). Yuki, the only female on the original show, is now a fighter pilot instead of a nurse, but her relationship with Kodai works well. I wish they had done something else with the aliens, as they are a bit too much Starship Troopery (one scene shows the influence of Trey's work in that film), but blue skinned humans were probably never something modern viewers were going to accept. The plot starts out as the original did, but by the third act we have naturally (and I stress that it does feel like a natural progression) moved into the territory of the second film. Re-watching that last night, I was shocked at how many scenes in the new one directly mirrored it, dialog and all. Characters get their moments... although, again, a few hundred more "red shirts" would have helped greatly. (I did get a good laugh when a newcomer said they were assigned to the "third bridge". That thing blew up once an episode, so you knew his fate!)

No spoilers, but it ends the way a Yamato movie should end. To not go there would be too... Hollywood.

"Space Battleship Yamato" has, as of yet, not been released in the US. I recommend searching it out.

1,102

(32 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yojimbo is so much of a Western, though, and has lots of humor. Naturally, it will depend on who you're introducing and why.

1,103

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've been watching the movies Rifftrax is digging up to do video on demand versions of.

Oh. My. God.

Last night we saw Curse of Bigfoot. It'll be a week before I can look at any mainstream film and not consider it genius for not being on that level.

1,104

(52 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think Frank Oz said casting had been over for awhile before they realized they should see if Rick Moranis could even sing. While it worked out there, all too often it doesn't. Mind you, things could improve if vocal dubbing came back in style (and wouldn't be mentioned in the press).

1,105

(52 replies, posted in Episodes)

Why musicals have disappeared is an interesting question. I think part of it is the change Broadway went through in the 70's. The type of show that was often borrowed by Hollywood was replaced, first by experimental, stagy shows like Chicago and Chorus Line (bare, minimalist stage, little plot), then the large fully sung monsters introduced to us by British creators. These are damned HARD to translate to film, at least well, and there's a good reason it took decades for someone to attempt Chicago or Phantom. Annie was one of the last old guard shows.

Another factor is the cost of Broadway musicals. They're now incredibly expensive to produce: I think Wicked, the day it opened, needed to sell out for almost two years to BREAK EVEN. This means there is LESS incentive to allow a filmed version. A movie means people don't have to go to NYC to see the live version. It means the touring version will draw less. You only do a movie when, literally, you've sucked all the money out of every other profit stream.

There's also changing musical tastes, on and off broadway. You just don't get Broadway songs on the radio any more. "Tomorrow" from Annie was played on top 40 stations in the late 70's, and "One Night in Bangkok" from CHESS was a hit, but there's very little crossover now. No one even tries.

1,106

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The latest episode of The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe goes over the science of Prometheus. Needless to say, they weren't impressed smile

1,107

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The universe IS low fantasy.

1,108

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just remember, our safe word is "ouch".

1,109

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Or a medic.

I must admit, when I played pen and paper RPGs the rules were mostly ignored. It was more free form story telling (reading the Paranoia "rules" did not help change that)

1,111

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I had a thought today while I was back at work (after a week off), and thought I'd bounce it off of everyone.

There's an aspect to the movie Brave that I have yet to see any comments on. That is, the fact that there is a Mom. A living Mom. A living Mom who, in fact, is the biological mother of our female main character.

Think about that for a moment.

You never see that. The mother is always dead. She's dead, and the story is the daughter beating heads with her father, who being male NATURALLY doesn't understand her, and over the course of the story she finds her way and he accepts her for who she is.

You can't have that if there's a Mom. For one thing, the mother represents success. Especially if you're talking about a princess/queen dynamic. In Brave, the mom is strong. She's smart. She is POWERFUL. We see, in the story, that it is SHE who is the power behind the throne. Such a woman has no problem with a strong, willful daughter. She knows such traits will be needed. The only conflict will be one of control. Of at what point a girl becomes a woman, when mother's orders become just advice.

The end of such a story, of mother and daughter, will be one of compromise.

This is NOT what people want from a fairy tale.

1,112

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

1. Space Jesus. Jesus was an Engineer. We crucified him, therefore the entire species deserves eradication. It'd be like the American ambassador to Iran is killed by a sect, and the USA fires every nuclear weapon at the country killing the entire population. Is that the behaviour of Enlightened beings from the future?

Or it would be similar to cleaning out a petri dish once your experiment fails.

1,113

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

More to the point, we'd have gotten farther with space exploration if we were more willing to just give the environment a big middle finger. Space probes would be better with nuclear reactors on them, for example, and then there's the proposed spaceship that launches from Earth by throwing nukes out the back. Being environmentally sound takes quite a lot of effort (which is why no industry starts off that way).

1,114

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Like I said, at least locally that would be expected when 3D only gets 1/5 of the screens.

1,115

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It is a case where originally there was just to be a twelve episode mini-series, and that's it, but early on they were told to do a second 14 episode season. So, it could be the "reset" is left from when this was all there was going to be.

1,116

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I find Wallstreet's concern for good storytelling touching smile Maybe others can report on how things are near them, but the Regal theater I saw Brave in today had it on 4 2D screens... and only 1 3D screen. I found that interesting.

1,117

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think this is one of those rare cases where I saw a different film than everyone else did. I actually enjoyed that it wasn't the film the trailers said it was: it wasn't a wacky comedy (for most of it), and it wasn't yet another "strong teen girl kicks butt" tale. I saw it coming, but also liked how the torn tapestry actually had nothing to do with saving Mom.

I would be interested to know which half of the film belonged to the female director and which to the male one (the meeting Mom half way seems the most feminine, while kick butt rebel Princess is how guys like their women)

Zarban wrote:
Invid wrote:

Well, that's a case of the Green Lanterns being modeled after E.E. 'Doc' Smith's Lensemen stories, and Lucas dipping into that same source for the Jedi.

But even so, they didn't need to make the scenes with Sinestro resemble the Jedi Council scenes in the prequels. Arrange the dudes in two rows or a half-circle or on screens or walking thru in a garden or sitting around a table—anything.

I almost think the animated versions have them up on this high curved platform, looking down at the lesser creatures, or even just floating above. It might have been a case of trying not to be seen as copying that, not realizing they were doing the Star Wars thing.

1,119

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

"Hey, Nick, you know how you're no longer getting good ratings, and how we were your last big hit? Well..."

Zarban wrote:

I watched Green Lantern last night. It's very much by-the-numbers, but there's nothing particularly objectionable. It cribs a lot from the Star Wars prequels, of all things, for the Green Lantern Corps.

Well, that's a case of the Green Lanterns being modeled after E.E. 'Doc' Smith's Lensemen stories, and Lucas dipping into that same source for the Jedi. Interestingly, the new Green Lantern cartoon gets the main characters away from the Corps for the first season, although the direct to DVD movies dealt with them.

1,121

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

dbngaa wrote:
Zarban wrote:

Boys.... you're scaring the straights....  big_smile  Grave of the Fireflies is the feel-good movie of the year!  big_smile

  Show
What's strange to me is the choice of letting the kids die. If they had lived, the audience would think "Gosh, Japanese people who lived thru WW2 had it hard," which I think is what the film maker wants. Instead, it sort of sets up the audience to think, "Gosh, only the complete bastards survived WW2, and they let helpless orphans starve!" And then they would go beat up an old person.

That's a good point, Zarban.  It does undercut the intended message a bit.  Everyone go watch Empire of the Sun instead.

What we have here is the difference between what the audience thinks the message will be going in, and what it actually is. You can't fault a movie for doing X badly when it wasn't trying to do X...

1,122

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I have the manga, or at least the first parts. The movie basically seemed to say, "yeah, getting nuked is bad, but hey, keep a positive attitude!" Safe to say, it's creator came out of WW II much happier than the creator of Grave of the Fireflies.

It should also have nothing to do with said book, or in fact be a parody with the exact opposite message of the original smile

1,124

(109 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The thing you have to understand about Grave of the Fireflies is... it's an autobiography. The writer is ashamed to have actually survived, so treated the fictional version of himself the way he feels things should have gone. That puts a whole new spin on the story.

For a different treatment on the subject, go watch Barefoot Gen, an autobiographical cartoon about surviving the atomic bomb. More uplifting than Grave of the Fireflies, to a very surprising degree.

I haven't seen a single modern Italian gangster film. No Godfather, no Goodfellas... hell, no Sopranos. No reason, I just haven't. I've watched old ones, from the 30's and 40's. Closest I've come is the Michael Keaton comedy Johnny Dangerously, and maybe New Jack City (where the Black gang is encroaching on traditional Mafia turf).