1,151

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

yup

1,152

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nope.

1,153

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Hurt Locker

Circular REM cycles

1,154

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Chocolat

1,155

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The "french" is just there merely for how you pronounce it.

1,156

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Haha, nope.

1,157

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love IWaV

1,158

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill But Came Down a Mountain

French bitter water

1,159

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

Here's the link, Eddie: https://twitter.com/markraudonis/status … 4821435392 I see now that I look at it that I paraphrased pretty … um … aggressively.

The fact that you got to work under him knocks me out, man. I got a really, really nice email from him last week about something I'd made, and I nearbouts peed myself in excitement.

Okay, I did pee myself. But only a little bit. I covered it up my dumping my nalgene in my lap … which in retrospect was kind of a bad move.

Mark does not suffer fools at all (I've gotten reamed out a few times by him in my day) and so when he offers praise, it fucking means something.  I'll give him a call and mention I know you.

1,160

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hey Jeff,

Where is the link to Mark's twitter post.  Can't seem to find it.

1,161

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

As Mark Raudonis of Bunim-Murray said on Twitter last night, that doesn't mean a damn thing when you've got 125 individual licenses.

When people ask me where I learned to edit, I say, "Mark Raudonis."

I interned at Bunim-Murray in the summer of 2000 and he, for whatever reason, saw something in me and let me apprentice (for lack of a better term) under him that summer.  He let me cut bumps and teases (as an INTERN, mind you) recommended books and movies, ripped my student films to shreds, let me work on my own projects after hours, and basically poured as much info as he could cram in my brain.  I have been lucky to call him a mentor, boss, and friend. 

I say all this as a preface to the larger point that he's one of the sharpest dudes out there in the world of post.  He switched all of BMP over to a FCP/XSAN company in 2004 when it was unheard of back then.  He did it because he was smart enough to see the advantages of it when the rest of the industry was still AVID.  Apple even filmed a commercial promoting FCP with him and aired it in all of their stores through 2005 (the video for which I can't find).  I rarely say trust everything a single person says, but Mark knows his shit, and you should all heed what he says.

1,162

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:

Pffft. Cinema IS editing.

As an editor, I jsut want to say I love a good one'er.  I don't want it for every shot, but one of my most favorite shots EVER is the slow push on Pacino's face before he pops the Turk and the Cop in Godfather.  Had there been a cutaway, it would have cut out the drama significantly.

A good editor knows when NOT to cutaway, just as much when to cutaway.  And if a scene is best told in one take, then a good editor would be first to say.

1,163

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Zarban wrote:

Pffft. Cinema IS editing.

As an editor, I jsut want to say I love a good one'er.  I don't want it for every shot, but one of my most favorite shots EVER is the slow push on Pacino's face before he pops the Turk and the Cop in Godfather.  Had there been a cutaway, it would have cut out the drama significantly.

A good editor knows when NOT to cutaway, just as much when to cutaway.  And if a scene is best told in one take, then a good editor would be first to say.

1,164

(13 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This is my favorite.  On a hand-cranked 16mm box camera from the forgotten classic I Am Cuba.

1,165

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Wow, y'all aint about to let that go, huh?

1,166

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Devil is in the details.  I should have been more specific.

OMF does not exist and requires third party support.  When they DO include it, it will lean on metadata instead of tracks. 

Same with XML.

For tape control, they provide a list of cameras that will NOT interface with Devk control, and several of them are formats that Pro's use.  Otherwise, they say rely on third party support.

For scratch disk setting, which used to be one of the first things you did, is now auto defaulted to your local drive.  Makes no sense in an age of 1 TB drives for 200 bucks.

No Multicam NOW.  It is pointless to launch it without it.

I was mistaken on relinking, and I retract that one.

So most of my quips are still there, just more specific now.  It isn't misinformation, just specificity.

1,167

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm curious as to what misinformation there was out there.  My reactions are based on what I've experienced first hand with it.

1,168

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

To be fair, Apple's FAQ does nothing to address real concerns that face FCP houses right now.

1,169

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hmmm.

I've been going to Comic Con since 1993 and I still advocate for it.  I could envision doing a SDCC themed discussion about its importance and relevance or lack there of with some other DiF'ers.

1,170

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Distinction noted.

My beef is with Apple and their respective apologista operating under the assumption that since in theory a professional job can be done by one person using solely FCPx, then the professional market is satiated.  It is not.  I would say that since Final Cut PRO (their choice of word) was designed to be competitive in the broadcast market, wherein every piece of work is collaborative and dependent on multiple platforms, then it should then keep that same market in mind when completely redesigning said software. 

It seems like much ado about nothing.  But I have friends who have personally invested hundreds of thousands of dollars switching to FCP because Apple was very clear in its commitment to supporting what we needed.  If you cut on your own, and do wedding videos or corporates (and again, I've done that myself) and FCPx works for you, then great.  But that is NOT anywhere near the majority of the professional market, and everyone should just stop pretending it is.

1,171

(81 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Great article here regarding the talking points of apologists.

http://www.selfreliantfilm.com/2011/06/ … -thoughts/

I also want to make a distinction that sounds kinda dickish, but is oh so true and kinda needs to be said.  When I and others say hat FCPx doesn't support what professionals use, things like that FAQ get circulated as some sort of defense.  Thing is, professional doesn't mean that you get 1000 bucks to cut a wedding video on your own,  or 500 bucks to cut a local commercial.  Professional means you are one editor of a few in both the offline and online process, you have multiple assists loading, transcoding, and logging your footage, as well as Junior Editors who string footage out for you.  You need all of hese things because you are cutting something that is going to air on a television or in a theater.  You need that because you have to send it out to color corrector who's whole job it is is to make sure that colors are both vibrant and also legal and pass QC.  You need it because your audio has to be mixed by someone who works off of Pro Tools and makes sure that someone in the distant background isn't screaming "fuck," because S&P will sure as shit throw it bak at you.  You need a legion of people helping you edit because THAT'S what professional means.  Not that your video gets 200k hits on youtube or is featured on Web Soup, or that your marketing video for your father's Tool and Die company has "Rock You Like a Hurricane," on the soundtrack.  It's also not, as fun as it was to make it, your short film.  It's not you by yourself at two in the morning at the comfort of your own home on your own system, desk adorned with gummy worms and, ironically enough, diet Mountain Dew.  I've done all of the above, btw.  It's an awesome way to learn and to fill time between gigs or as impassioned side projects that may bear fruit one day. But it isn't the Pro environment Jeff and I are talking about.

Pro means 12 hour days in a bay that you share with the night shift, internal notes, network notes, Unity or SAN logins, Unity or San crashes, last minute weekend shifts, mad dash lock sessions, having to fire your friend that you recommended because he just can't cut fast enough, begging friends to come on last minute, and finally seeing it air in a theater or on a TV network.  That environment demands everything Jeff mentions above.

1,172

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think we can sorta split the middle.   I use the VFX Union podcast as an example.  It was relevant to what you guys were inot, and there was overlap with many things discussed on the show, and was accessible via the page.  BUT it is not archived as such in the episode wheelhouse.  I think under the "Blog" heading things like this might work out.

1,173

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Well, let's kick it back to you guys.  List the Prime DiF'ers and your favorite 2nd stringers (like moi) and what you want to hear them talk about for an hour or 90 minutes or whatever.

1,174

(207 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teen Wolf

Automaton Athletes

1,175

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I don't know if it would be a regular weekly thing, but more like a special, whenever sort of thing.