1,201

(62 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,202

(62 replies, posted in Off Topic)

About the title sequence, it changes from episode to episode depending on where the story is taking place.  So while every episode features King's Landing and Winterfell, some episodes feature places like Pentos and Vaes Dothrak.  ALso, the bands around the sun are heiroglyphs telling the backstory of the main houses of Westeros.

As for the show, "Sopranos in Middle Earth," is still the best description I've heard.

1,203

(62 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,204

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I quite enjoy the first two X Men movies and only recently saw the third one which was a giant yawn the entire way through.  I actually prefer the second film to the first and I hope one day DiF covers all three.

1,205

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

And that is why I love Teague, because that is exactly what I was going for.

1,206

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

^This.

My son is all about wanting to move away from pooping in his diaper and more in a direction of covering his legs in shit while he cackles maniacally at me.  In that sense, mission accomplished.  I still would prefer a more traditional approach to pooping in his predetermined paper sack.

.....and this reminds me quite a bit of Pirates.

1,207

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

1,208

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

I want everyone of the casts characters listed here, NOW, Zarban.

1,209

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

1,210

(34 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just now digging into this one.  Not to defend MTV, but MTV hardly invented frenetic editing, or bad editing for that matter.

1,211

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, I think we're all in agreement over what didn't work, I think its just a matter of some other things working better for.

1,212

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Im seeing TVOTR live thursday, btw at a taping for Cee Lo Green's new show.

1,213

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

1,214

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I agree.  The trailer for Captain America has a great line where Stanly Tucci answers Chris Evans who asks, "Why me?"

"Because a weak man knows the value of strength." 

There ya go Thor, there's your movie.  Put Thor in Donald Blake's crippled body, have him help people, Jane falls in love with the content of Thor's character.  Instead of having Kat Dennings remind us how hot he is every few minutes.

1,215

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It should be noted, that you can like something imperfect.  Ryan is articulating why the movie doesn't work for HIM (and he does a superb job in doing so.  Seriously good stuff, sir.)

But don't view this as an instruction manual on how to hate the stuff you like.  I'd be interested in you rebutting that film point by point.  And even if you can't, you have every right to like that film and not feel like an idiot.

1,216

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,217

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Totally impenetrable logic.

1,218

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

^This.  I'm a long time TVOTR fan.  I saw them when they won the 2004 SHortlist Award and haven't looked back since.  I like this album a lot, and find it a nice change of pace while still moving their style forward.  Very good album to listen to while writing.

And no, while I like Metric, I am not related to the singer.

1,219

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I love how much Zardoz doesn't give a FUCK about anything.

1,220

(16 replies, posted in Episodes)

No kidding, Dorkman.  People don't often realize just how much was riding on that first film, especially.  Had it tanked, New Line absolutely would have gone out of business and PJ would be directing Zippy's commercials in New Zealand (they have Zippy's in New Zealand, I think).  Jus tthe fact that Peter and Fran always pitched LOTR as two movies goes to show what conventional thinking was at the time: there's no way they are giving me three films off the bat.  Robert Shaye has balls bigger than I ever will.

1,222

(16 replies, posted in Episodes)

I don't think you're entirely wrong, but he did come out and say plainly, "I'm in no position to say Video Games can never be art, because it's in the future and there's no way of knowing."

He did also have a few words for fanboys, and honestly considering just how many cracks I saw directed at his weight and health issues, I can understand just a tad bit of acrimony on his part.  I love nerdy things, but nerd culture can be an ugly, ugly beast at times.  Look no further than the Donald Glover/Spider Man debacle.  If he would have said "From what I've seen, in their current incarnation, video games are not art." I seriously wouldn't have given a shit.  But he took it a step further then he needed, undoubtedly.  As a result, he got rightfully shelacked by folks, and at the end of the day I truly felt like while his opinion didn't shift, it did change his perspective a bit.  That's what good debate should do.

I also understand the almost willful ignorance of a lot of younger folk and the temptation to snap back with some invective, like Roger did.  Shit, I'm 33 and I feel like waving my cane at my wife's dance students when they think Britney's new single is great song writing.  Certainly that's not a 1-1 comparison of video game fans to tween girls, but as a regular player of WoW and Halo I can tell you without hesitation that most gamers I've played with are fucking loons.

1,223

(16 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm so conflicted about Ebert.  His argument about Video Games as art is totally asinine, and he has others which can be equally infuriating.  But I revere the role criticism has in filmmaking and I think over the course of his career he's arced towards a very positive impact on film.  Not only that but he truly advocates for quality film and his passion is unmistakable.  I respect him a great deal for jumping headfirst into blogging.  Like many prolific bloggers find out, A blog isn't a thesis that you can slave over and mold as your perspective changes.  It's a snapshot of your best articulated feelings IN THAT TIME AND PLACE.  I think if he were to write that same post now, it would be much more nuanced.  But, he puts his feelings out there and he doesn't apologize or back peddle, he simply states his reasoning and updates on wether that viewpoint changes or not.  Also, much like Andrew Sullivan, he has no problem posting and linking to articles that completely savage his opinions.

I don't share all or even most of his opinions, but the man has had a huge impact on both criticism and film itself, and can't be overlooked.  Personally, he was hugely influential on me in terms of defining taste and recognizing the importance of spirited debate.  Siskel and Ebert was a staple in my household as a child from back in the PBS days, and now with At The Movies back on PBS, it's taken its place again as required viewing in the Doty household.

1,224

(57 replies, posted in Episodes)

One thing I wanted to mention on the anniversary show with respect to my son, is that I also dont plan to daisy chain films back to back either.  We live in the age where I could show my son these films all in the same weekend if I chose, but I actually think that's detrimental in the long run.  Part of being into nerdy things is the anticipation.  Some of the most defining nerd moments I have in my life were built around waiting for something cool to come out.  SO when he hits a certain age, I'm thinking 4-5, I'll show him A New Hope.  THen, a few months later, I'll show him Empire.  I'll TRY as best I can to make him wait for  Jedi.  After talking those out and seeing what his feelings are, we may...or may not watch the prequels.  Point is, I think it's important to regulate the frequency of completing franchises, especially at a young age.

1,225

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Someone very industrious should create one for the cast members.  A nice way to punctuate a post. 

For the record, I am not that industrious person.