You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dorkman
I never really had a problem navigating it, myself...
If you're going to submenu everything, I would have one link for "All Commentaries By Title," effectively like it was listed before. I haven't listened to much in the way of other (non-DIF) commentaries, but if I were to do so, it would be for background listening while I worked on something else. In which case I'd browse for a movie title and pick one of the commentaries available. I'd be less inclined to do that if I had to click through up to 27 different pages as a "Not Sure What I'm Looking For" penalty.
/disagree
The apostrophe and the Ns don't match. The other letters would look the same in a number of sans serif block fonts.
I believe Zarban was doing a rather nuanced Elena Kagan joke. I lol'd in a nuanced way.
Bwahaha.
We're going to want to set the date a few months in advance so we can figure out schedules and hype it up, and anyone who wants to read the books to prepare (I probably will do so) will have ample warning.
I see the point re: length on the one hand, but on the other hand if we expect that we'll be doing the movies eventually anyway, one way or another we're going to wind up talking about the movies for 12+ hours. I just think the potential for the ensuing of hijinks is greater when we give the ultimate epic movies the ultimate epic commentary.
Yes, I've seen Kevin Smith do his bit about the movies, too. I don't find it an accurate characterization of them, though.
See, the thing is that the things onscreen continue to happen and change as the hours go on, so there are new things to talk about.
If we were talking about something like Warhol's EMPIRE I'd totally see your point.
I'm trying to talk the folks into doing a marathon live show of all three LOTRs in one day, with each part to be released as its own commentary. So after the big day, LOTR would roll out over six weeks. My thought is we'd have pretty much all the substitute panelists on hand too, so we could tag-team out, and do it on a holiday weekend so even people who don't normally join the live chats could set aside a few hours to join the fun.
But I have encountered some probably sensible resistance to the idea and we may just do them piecemeal like our other franchise entries.
No. I like a number of scenes and some characters, but I feel like this particular mixtape didn't have the flow of some of QT's prior work. I don't have a boiling hatred for it but I could probably go the rest of my life without watching it again (although I'm sure I won't, since sooner or later we're sure to DIF it).
I just watched LETHAL WEAPON because I had nothing else to do.
I thought it was a fine movie. A bit overlong but I was watching the "Director's Cut" so I give it the handicap, as well as the "no one made them like this until this" handicap. Not much of an "Actioner" from a modern perspective but I can see how it would've rocked people back on their heels in 87. Definitely see the common ancestry with KISS KISS BANG BANG.
It's not available on Netflix Instant, which as I understand it means it doesn't exist.
What the fuck, you guys are using NAMES?!
Am I the only PROFESSIONAL here?!
I can't speak for the whole series, but for the episode I worked on, we did indeed have an entire directory of severed limbs among the various explosion and bloodburst elements.
I didn't work on any shots that used them, but they were there.
Beldar brings up a good point -- Invid, I think maybe you could clarify your question.
Do you mean "if you could go back in time, knowing what you know now, would you still take the gig," or do you mean "If the Asylum came to you tomorrow, saying they really liked 2010: MOBY DICK, and offered you 1985: BIG BROTHER AND BIGGER RATS, would you say yes"?
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dorkman
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.