101

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The fucking Super Bowl is gonna make us wait an extra week for Episode 4. God dammit.

102

(30 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was watching something with my mom the other day and a TV spot for this appeared. She said to me: "That video game looks really silly." I explained to her it was a movie and she couldn't understand why or how it got made. She legitimately thought I, Frankenstein was a video game because of all the crappy looking effects and color correction. I think that perfectly captures the general public's reaction to this turd.

103

(121 replies, posted in Episodes)

bullet3 wrote:

Abrams is a terrible action director. Shaky-cam all over the place, bad use of geography, and the guy refuses to give you master shots for the space stuff. It kinda bugged me in Star Trek 09, and really pissed me off in STID.

I'm not sure if I entirely buy that because the opening scene of LOST's pilot is some of the best action ever shot for television. I didn't notice it nearly as much in the first film as I did in STID. Maybe he's just gotten progressively worse with more freedom?

redxavier wrote:

The best I've seen recently is The Raid.

Gareth Evans will save us all.

104

(199 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If you haven't hopped aboard the hype train yet, you're missing out on some masterful television and storytelling. Even with only two episodes thus far, I'm already prepared to declare this is the show that will take Breaking Bad's throne as the critical darling of television. Here's a rundown for the uninitiated:

+ Neo-Noir Mystery
+ Written by novelist Nic Pizzolatto (Galveston, Between Here and the Yellow Sea, Wanted Man)
+ Directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga (Jane Eyre)
+ Anthology Format
+ Matthew McConaughey, Woody Harrelson and Michelle Monaghan lead the first season

Why am I hyped? While cop shows are arguably the most common genre on all of television, this series offers a very unique take on the premise thanks to its neo-noir tones. The writing has been loaded with tremendous bits of character building, philosophical musings, and surprising but logical twists. The anthology format allows the show to neatly tie-up it's story by the end of each season, meaning we won't have mysteries dragged on and on to keep viewers interested in the hope of finally seeing resolutions (looking at you, LOST). We also don't have to worry about the show pulling any punches or looking like a generic police procedural thanks to HBO being HBO. Speaking of which, the cinematography is nothing short of fucking spectacular; not only is the imagery breathtaking but it also enhances the tone of the series. It isn't Roger Deakins levels of eye porn, but it's close.

The show also utilizes multiple timelines to tell the story as McConaughey and Harrelson's characters reflect back on the case after a similar murder shows up 17 years later after the original. This gives viewers great insight into the psyche of both characters and how the case changed their lives. The performances are all tremendous with McConaughey already locking up the Emmy for Lead Actor in a Miniseries. I know that's a bit much to say after just two episodes, but his performance is that good.

TL;DR - GET HYPE

105

(121 replies, posted in Episodes)

avatar wrote:
Trey wrote:

However ST:ID- while still delivering lots of bangbang - completely abandoned any pretense of logic or sense.  It's not just the dumbest Trek ever, it's a dumb movie in general.

Dumber than a hammer full of sacks. This is all I remember of it...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_meloes6SoT1qbdmjeo1_500.gif

I really need to see that shootout between the crew, the Klingons and Khan again. In the theater I had no fucking idea who was shooting at who, who hit what, or where anyone was positioned. I don't recall the shootout aboard Nero's ship in Star Trek '09 being nearly as chaotic or logistically incomprehensible.

http://i.imgur.com/Qao0RSo.jpg

Never forget.

Faldor wrote:

I'm still holding out for Now You See Me

This.

108

(97 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I just saw Captain Phillips and I do not understand the awards hype for Barkhad Abdi at all. Of the Somali pirates, I thought Faysal Ahmed as Najee gave a far more intense and compelling performance.

109

(97 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:
redxavier wrote:

I want Gravity to win [Gary Oldman]every one![/Gary Oldman], but would retain my faith in humanity if it won cinematography, effects and directing.

As much as I love Gravity and want it to win awards, I'd rather Deakins won cinematography for Prisoners because-

a) that movie looks great
b) I want it to win something as it didn't get any performance noms
c) he's Deakins and has never won one yet which is tragic

Everything this man just said. I don't even take the Oscars that seriously but it would be nice for Deakins to finally win that fucking award.

110

(97 replies, posted in Off Topic)

No way, no how, did Star Trek have better visual effects than Elysium.

Jackass: Bad Grandpa got a nomination for best makeup, which means that Jackass is now an Academy Award nominated series. Meanwhile, The Butler didn't receive a single nomination. And that's just way too funny for words.

111

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/740075_10202663254125959_1661607675_o.jpg

This is Judge Claus. In case you children have forgotten, this orphanage operates under the same rules as the rest of the world. The headmistress is not jolly. I am jolly. The headmistress is a common scrooge; guilty of crying, guilty of pouting, and as of now, under sentence of coal. Any who obstruct me in carrying out the Christmas Spirit will be treated as an accessory to the naughty list. You have been warned. And as for you, headmistress... ho, ho, ho.

112

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

I was (mostly) rolling with Elysium just fine until the third act, when it went right off the rails.   None of the payoffs made sense and I couldn't help but start thinking of all sorts of better ways to go with them. 

And the final ta-dah! completely undercut the entire premise by showing that the central issue that drove the entire plot could have been easily solved from the very beginning.

I'd go into detail, but I'm hoping Elysium will be very high on our to-do list when we re-convene after the holiday so we can really get into it.

Although I don't think the third act specifically paid off what it was previously setting up, I did enjoy the payoffs. I thought the whole thing with Kruger's Crew versus everyone was a nice twist and pretty entertaining. I wanted to see Kruger and his boys get their shit destroyed by Max, so I consider it a success in that regard. And although the whole situation could have been easily solved, it wasn't, because everyone up on Elysium were a bunch of cunts without empathy for anyone on Earth, which I think was the point. Also, I really liked the action scenes in the third act, with the exception of a few shaky cam moments here and there. I mean shit, regardless of how dumb any movie could be, if it features stuff like this in the third act, I'm going to be entertained:

  Show
http://i.imgur.com/FJwdzax.gif
http://i.imgur.com/Xn4iWHp.gif
http://i.imgur.com/lCH44o4.gif

I just have a major soft spot for r-rated sci-fi action, regardless of the logistics of why it's happening.

113

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I completely disagree. Although I didn't think she was anything above mediocre, she didn't take me out of the movie and make me wonder if I was hallucinating like the shit in The Happening.

114

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

He was okay, but his character was dumb and nothing he did had any motivation.

Also, Jodie Foster and William Fichtner were fucking AWFUL.

Yeah, I checked out of your review when you said this:

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I have to mention the performances, because they are an embarrassment to the craft of acting. Even people who we traditionally think of as “bad actors” have never turned in the sorts of performances that William Fichtner and Jodie Foster give us here.

Have you seen The Happening?

115

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I'd link to my review but it's in the Reviews section of the forum so check it out if you want. Suffice to say that nothing in the movie makes a lick of sense, not to mention the terrible performances and world building.

http://i.imgur.com/dWQ4Vnq.gif

116

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:
Jimmy B wrote:

I like Elysium. I was watching it thinking 'people think this is bad?' It's not fantastic or anything but I had fun with it.


Well, I have it at 5/10 on IMDb, so basically middle of the road, slightly on the bad side of average. But considering the talent involved I expected something alot more inspired and passionate. It felt like Blomkamp just did a director-for-hire project. I don't care if it exists or not, which is pretty much the worst case of "average" movie there is.

Fair enough. The thing I don't understand is someone calling it outright terrible or even the worst movie they saw in 2013. I just cannot comprehend how anyone could think it was among the worst films of the year, considering this year featured:

Now You See Me
After Earth
A Good Day to Die Hard
Olympus Has Fallen
R.I.P.D.
Paranoia
Getaway
(GO AWAY GETAWAY, STAY AWAY GETAWAY)
The Mortal Instruments
Grown Ups 2
Movie 43
Scary Movie 5
A Haunted House
The Starving Games

Granted, I only saw one off that list, but from the trailers alone for the rest, there is no fucking way they were better than Elysium.

117

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Deal_fdfaeb_1389685.gif

118

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I personally loved the hell out of Elysium. It didn't have the deepest characters by any means but that shit almost never bothers me if the plot, setting, and action entertain me; which they all did. Also, Sharlto Copley ruled as Kruger, just like he rules with everything he does.

119

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:
Ewing wrote:

I have a remedy for that.

SO much better!

If PTA had followed the guidance of Smash Mouth, he would have an Oscar to his name.

Also, for best current American directors, Scorsese can still bring it when he's motivated with good material. Even the pilot to Boardwalk Empire felt like more of a movie than a lot of shit released in theaters during 2010.

120

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Every time I hear someone talk about Her, I have flashbacks to this:

http://cdn.crushable.com/files/2012/09/ann-veal-her.gif

121

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:
Ewing wrote:

Are there any directors from the past 30-ish years that you enjoyed more after their debut film?

Sure.  Peter Jackson, Cuaron, and del Toro are three that come immediately to mind.   They didn't bust out of the gate with a game-changing smash, they showed promise early on and then worked their way up to the really good stuff.

Fair enough, the only reason I asked is because if you felt everyone in recent memory got worse, or rather, didn't entertain you as much after their first real movie, then that would shock the hell out of me and reek somewhat of snobbery.

But who are you to doubt Bad Taste?

Also, I like to think of Cuaron and Shyamalan as diametric opposites. One gets progressively better and more ambitious with each film, the other gets progressively worse and lazier with each film. Perhaps they were sent to Earth by greater forces, to greater demonstrate and contextualize the ideas of contrast, success, failure, and basic line charts to humanity.

Trey wrote:

I was more bothered by the non-ending of THERE WILL BE BLOOD that same year, to be honest.

I have a remedy for that.

122

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague wrote:

Do the Wachowskis go on the "greatest American directors? list?

Ewing wrote:

Am I getting trolled?

123

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Are there any directors from the past 30-ish years that you enjoyed more after their debut film?

124

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

Shaun is still my fave Wright film too, by a country mile.    And Boogie Nights is my favorite PT Anderson, and Raising Arizona my fave Coen movie...    All of which - hmm, this might be important - were their early breakout hey-who-is-THIS-guy(s)? movies.

In all cases, for me their movies since then have been more "I see what you did there" than "I am entertained by what you did there".    Sometimes there's just something special about the energy when the new guy (or gal) gets their first shot at making the movie they really want to make.

Often they go on to make lots of money and even win Oscars, but still there's some spark that's not quiiiite there anymore.

*See also Spielberg, Lucas, Scorcese, Spike Lee, Shyamalan...

I'm not bashing your point of view but I can't be the only one who realizes this sounds exactly the same as someone saying "Their first album was better".

125

(209 replies, posted in Off Topic)

No Country For Old Men hasn't been mentioned once in this discussion. I personally love it and I wish the Coen brothers would try again at something completely straightforward without any comedy. Also, Deakins.