1,426

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I love that Underwood's ringtone is slightly creepy and foreboding. Also, it blends into the score almost perfectly on certain occasions.

1,427

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

And hey, I just realized who that actress is who I recognize. Kristen Connolly from The Cabin in the Woods has a prominent role!

1,428

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Didn't they invent a category for Dr. Horrible? I'd love to see them change the acting category rules to fit House of Cards in.

1,429

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Spacey's performance is anchoring the show for me. The plot itself is mildly interesting so far, but it's Spacey who's selling the shit out of it. Can you be nominated for an Emmy for an internet-only show, I wonder?

1,430

(58 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague Edt: In this thread, please mark your spoilers with the episode number you're up to. With all episodes released at once, there's no telling where anyone is in the show - or if someone who has seen, say, six episodes will know whether or not your spoiler will spoil them. Thanks!

This is a thread where we can talk about the show. It's gonna be weird, given the release model, so please mark your spoilers, and mention which episode you're spoiling.

I've only just started the pilot, and this sure looks like a David Fincher production.

1,431

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

Kept expecting it to pull out of Nicolas Cage's eye or something. The internet has ruined me.

1,432

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm growing tired of it. It's not a cool inside joke that only cinephiles know anymore, because every blockbuster director since Spielberg has used it, assuming they were being clever. The Hobbit didn't need a Wilhelm scream. What's the point? When I first started recognizing it, I felt so cool, like I was seeing a secret that only film buffs knew. Now, the joke is wearing thin.

1,433

(66 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If you'd like to read a professional film critic's commentary on the first Smith video posted, read Scott Weinberg's great take on it.

1,434

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://www.dailyblam.com/news/2013/01/3 … too-sequel

Rumors abound that Sony may cut Mikael's character from the sequel. Having read the book, isn't that kind of impossible?

1,435

(66 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think that both can exist in the same world. White isn't into film criticism so much as he's into film analysis. Two different worlds, absolutely, but I don't think there's any need to declare that one's better than the other.

1,436

(66 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Armond White is an interesting case. I really doubt that he actually believes most of the stuff he writes, but damn it if he doesn't commit to those insane ramblings of his. They're so informed by artistic and cinematic history that it's hard to dismiss him as crazy.

Sweet. Time to swing the banhammer.

1,438

(24 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Here are my top 10:

1) Gravity
2) Upstream Color
3) Star Trek into Darkness
4) Elysium
5) Mud
6) Much Ado About Nothing
7) Pacific Rim
8) The Place Beyond the Pines
9) Side Effects
10) Iron Man 3

Yours?

I literally didn't know there was a novel until I spotted it at a bookstore a few days after seeing it. I'll probably give it a look in the near future.

BTW, congrats on your work! I was pretty impressed with the CGI. I assume your work was mostly Bonies? Anything you can spill about it?

1,440

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Huck Finn is a classic example of going to the mansion. It's probably one of the definitive ones.

1,441

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I don't think they missed his point at all. I think they were needling him for being snooty and dismissive.

1,442

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Siskel and Ebert absolutely slam a snooty Star Wars-hating critic back in 1983.

1,443

(25 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I remember seeing a trailer for this like a year ago. I figured it got put on a shelf. Looks interesting.

Betcha Kirsten Dunst has TK though.

1,444

(124 replies, posted in Episodes)

Well, he's been going on podcasts for months now with people telling him that the movie is structurally brilliant and perfectly written. I don't care how humble you are, that's gonna lift your ego a little bit. Rian Johnson is not an egotist by any stretch, but when people poke at your baby, you're within your rights to get annoyed.

By the way, I feel for Teague on this commentary. It hurt me that you guys are right.

I just got a gig writing reviews for this new site, and this is my first review for them. I'd love you to check it out here.

Warm Bodies shares a lot in common with last year’s Chronicle, a film I really enjoyed. Like Josh Trank’s debut, warm Bodies is a film with surprisingly large scale that somehow managed to slip under the radar of most film buffs and journalists; I had heard nothing about it until a trailer was released, and it seemed like an affable enough romantic comedy with a genre twist. Also like Chronicle, Warm Bodies was shoved into a January slot by a studio that had little confidence in it. And just like Chronicle, Warm Bodies managed to surprise me.

Perhaps the most surprising thing about Warm Bodies is how straight it plays its romance. Irony and cynicism is the ruling class of comedy these days, but as much as I love 30 Rock and Arrested Development, it’s nice to see some good old-fashioned “boy meets girl” storytelling every now and again. Well, as old-fashioned as you can get when one of the lovers is undead.

Of course, the film isn’t without a contemporary sense of humor. It uses R, the film’s rotting hero who can only remember the first letter of his name, as a fantasy everyman. He complains about his girl troubles to his friend M (played ably by Rob Corddry), who responds, “Bitches, man.” Moments like these, as well as R’s internal narration, are inherently comedic coming from the mouths of zombies. But R’s quasi-existential musings about his place in the world and awkward movements around his crush are totally in sync with any average twenty-something. There have been movies with monstrous protagonists before, but this is perhaps the first zombie film to use the creatures to illustrate personal issues rather than as metaphors for the human condition.

Warm Bodies smartly avoids deconstructing its genre, which has been in vogue for genre comedies since Shaun of the Dead in 2004. The zombies here are conduits for humor, but the concept of the undead as a horror trope is rarely the target of jokes. This film could have very easily been another Zombieland, a half-hearted attempt at reworking what made Shaun of the Dead so successful, but Warm Bodies instead decides to go its own way by not tweaking the formula. The romance between the leads is far more important than the fact that they’re zombies, and that’s a key element to making Warm Bodies so successful.

R is played actor Nicholas Hoult, who sci-fi fans will recognize from his role as Beast in X-Men: First Class. His job is unenviable at best; he has to convincingly communicate the feelings and emotions of a character who can barely move or speak. His voiceover narration helps a lot with that, but Hoult manages to turn in a really solid performance regardless. I was less enthused with Teresa Palmer, who plays his love interest Julie. It took me a while to get on board with what she was doing with her performance; she spends half of the film as a badass Sarah Connor-type and the other half as… well, nothing really. I get the feeling that she was trying to underplay her character due to Julie’s backstory, which I won’t spoil here, but it doesn’t come across well. Still, she gives enough for Hoult to play off of.

Speaking of underplaying a character, John Malkovich also let me down. Playing Julie’s father, a hardened general for whom the fight against zombies is personal, it seemed to me that director Jonathan Levine was restraining his performance. When I see a movie with John Malkovich in it, I want to see him go crazy! Maybe that’s something he’s trying to move past, but I wish he had gone just a little bit further in certain moments of tension.

Warm Bodies plays with the zombie mythology in a way that had me a little confounded. It has the traditional beginning to the zombie apocalypse, complete with a rapidly spreading zombie-generating virus, but it extends that trope in an original way. In the movie’s universe, all zombies eventually lose the will to live (or something, it’s not made entirely clear), and they shed their skin and become “Bonies,” skeletal monsters who have no trace of humanity left. Basically, it’s an arbitrary addition to give humans and zombies a common opponent, but it seemed too far removed from common zombie lore for me. If the writer or director is going to make a choice like that, great – but fully commit to it and explore it. I was left wanting to know a lot more about the world than the movie is willing to tell, but I did appreciate the director’s staunch commitment to telling an uncomplicated love story.

Warm Bodies probably isn’t going to be a box office sensation, but if you’re willing to brave the weather next weekend, I recommend you give it a chance. Its marketing has been modest enough for the film to fly under the radar and the film isn’t radical enough to become a cult sensation. Despite that, I’d love to see it become successful. Warm Bodies is funny, sweet, and a perfect choice for a cold winter night.

1,446

(33 replies, posted in Episodes)

I couldn't really get into The American Scream. I might give it another shot, but I personally didn't find the people being profiled all that interesting. The Invisible War was incredibly powerful, though.

1,447

(124 replies, posted in Episodes)

Rian, if you're reading this, I love you and you should call me.

1,448

(124 replies, posted in Episodes)

Between Dredd last week and now this, this is a record streak for me disagreeing with DiF.

1,449

(43 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think you've got it backwards. Bob doesn't have to learn to hide what makes him special, he has to teach everyone else not to. The movie agrees with Bob, so it's not actually part of his arc.

1,450

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is going to sound weird, but I really don't get why people were clamoring for directors with distinctive visions to take on Episode VII. JJ is perfect for the film precisely because he isn't as distinctive as del Toro or Fincher. His sensibility fits the Star Wars universe perfectly. The further you stray from the feel and tone of the original trilogy, the more chance you have to fuck it up. Would I love to see Zack Snyder's take on the Star Wars universe? Absolutely. But is someone like him right for Episode VII? I don't think so.