You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Friends In Your Discord!
Miss having friends in your forum? We've migrated over to discord! Many of the threads that started here years ago continue on in a new setting.
Come join us!
Search options (Page 59 of 81)
Topics by Invid User defined search
Posts found: 1,451 to 1,475 of 2,003
Ah, Mystery Men. An excuse to finally see it. I hope at least one of you is familiar with the Flaming Carrot comic it's based on (one reason I avoided the film: they tried to do a Flaming Carrot movie without Flaming Carrot! Not that a FC movie would have been at all a good idea in the first place...)
Someone doing an iRiff of Zardoz has reminded me this is a movie you guys should really take a look at
Hell, it's about time you did some John Boorman in general. The idea that the same guy that did Zardoz also did Deliverance and Excalibur...
Plus the opening up of the post Jedi continuity for spin off novels and the like not only brings in money with no work on the part of Lucas, but also satisfies some of what people would want in a remake. When Star Wars dies off, either due to over exposure or just changing tastes, then it may be time for a remake. Then again, most of what we'd want to do in one can just as easily be done in an original story...
It's not uncommon for me to rent movies just for the commentary 
OK, this sucks. I'm use to studios making a version of a DVD just for Netflix, usually making a double sided disk two DVDs or some such. For Scott Pilgrim however they went the extra step of removing EVERY extra, including the commentaries! Oh, they left them in the menu, but you're told to buy the damned thing if you want to listen to them. I can fully understand removing extra scenes and such,but this makes renting DVDs no different then streaming. Sigh...
Your movie idea for a film set in the world of the logo, with people running in terror as the logo drops down on them, has already been done
There's an anime anthology movie (which never made it to DVD in the US) called Robot Carnival. A bunch of directors were given money and told to do whatever they wanted so long as it had a robot in it. The opening and closings were done by the creator of Akira, and involved a huge mechanical clockwork Robot Carnival title rolling into a small village, firing off fireworks and rockets which destroy the town and kill most of the people. The end sequence shows it continuing on its journey as the few survivors look at their destroyed homes and wonder what the fuck just happened.
About the only thing I have against him is his treatment of the non-special edition originals, but I know of authors who have done similar re-writes and not kept the originals in print and I don't hate them. Hmm, I think maybe for me what can be ignored doesn't have to be hated 
Also, I wouldn't call new Batman, Spiderman, or Superman movies remakes unless they're reusing the exact same plots as the earlier ones. They're just a new version of the characters. Some people see no difference, I know, but it'd be like saying each time they change the James Bond actor that they're remaking the first movie.
I also get annoyed when a new adaptation of a book is called a remake of an earlier adaptation, but that's just me 
And with the ad now gone, it now looks like you really misread Maul2's post 
I don't think it's unfair to draw a comparison between Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings and JMS's Babylon 5, at least as far as industry influence goes. In both cases they created projects that demanded multiple movies/seasons to finish the story and had a definite ending, and when others attempted to do the same type of thing they almost all crashed and burned
None of the other "5 year story arc" TV series lasted more then a season or two, and we have a growing number of "book 1" adaptations that will never see a followup. They both also broke some industry stereotypes, in that LotR was the first Fantasy movie to really break through and got others to be green lit, and B5 was the first non-Trek SF to last on TV and opened the floodgate.
I don't see the fact character arcs stopped as a totally bad thing, but maybe having them stop in the middle of the film and not in an interesting place isn't a good idea
Ideally they'd have gone into the first film thinking about a franchise and brought the characters in that one to a nice state at the end from which they could go into the next movies without having to worry about much baggage.
Tech demo movies can be entertaining in their own right, in the same way a piece of piano music written just to show off incredibly hard techniques can also be emotional and moving. It's just a rare combination, otherwise the early Pixar shorts and movies wouldn't have stood out so much from all the other early CGI demos.
During the live stream of the Twilight movies, either between films or during the second one the subject of the then new Atlas Shrugged trailer came up. At that point, one of you jumped in that you had done some work on the movie, it was horrible, and the director was going to take his name off of it. With the film in theaters today, and no access to that piece of audio at the moment, what was the story?
The history of the original radio show is interesting. An original idea for a series in which the Earth is destroyed in each show turned into 6 episodes with a definite ending from which there can be no sequel. Then they had to come up with a way to get the characters together again, minus Trillian, and end it with an open ending leaving room for an expected sequel... and Adams was never asked to do more
The gymnastics they had to do to try and match the end of the radio show to the start of the 3rd book for the new radio adaptations is rather extensive.
Also interesting is there were changes to the first series when it was released on records. The Restaurant at the End of the Universe episode was changed/expanded somewhat. Not sure which version is now available when you buy the show.
Yes, a fairytale movie was aimed at the non-kids market
All ages toons that draw in adults has been done, many times, but animated movies that don't even try for the kids demographic? We didn't exactly see tons of them, let along good or successful ones, after Beauty and the Beast.
(on the other hand, TV exploded with great animation for teens and adults despite the greater limitations on content. Maybe because they didn't have to have that big opening weekend but could grow an audience)
It's also one of those movies where they didn't really know they were adapting something. The story goes someone asked the writer(s) how much of the original story they were using, and it turns out nobody had bothered to turn the cards over to see it actually had one. It was just a set of fun pictures to them 
Posts found: 1,451 to 1,475 of 2,003