is the Hard drive an SSD?
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by switch
is the Hard drive an SSD?
thanks for the info vidina. Unfortunately, I don't have final say in what machines we purchase at the office. I will keep that info in mind when I make my PC purchase in 2014 though. Does the Quadro 3000M do well for CUDA?
Correction: I looked at our system specs on our iMacs. We have 8 gigs of RAM in each machine. The processor is the top of the line, but the RAM could have gone as high as 32 gigs. so our machines are not top of the line for 2011. Just the same, if you're going to get the new iMac, make sure you get as much RAM as you possibly can, especially if you plan on getting FCPX. Although, to be honest, I don't know all the technical stuff behind how FCPX utilizes system resources when doing background rendering. I'm not entirely convinced that more RAM is the answer. But I'm willing to be wrong on that.
I will correct my previous posts to reflect this.
I would also point out that FCPX system reqs state that 4GB of RAM is recommended.
Sam, how much experience have you had actually using FCPX? Do you use it for work currently or for play? In regards to your comments,
1. See next post. I have 8 gigs of RAM in my machine. It would appear, the more RAM the better for FCPX.
2. I never said that NLEs do good graphics, I was simply commenting on the so called layered photoshop file support in FCPX. Don't put words into my mouth.
3. Your right to say that X can only export to a small group of files, but consider that in 7 you had more file types you could export out to without going to Compressor. In Premiere, you can export to almost anything under the sun provided you have the codec on your comp. Avid also has more export formats available than FCPX. I was not comparing FCPX with FCP7 at that point, just pointing out the limited number of options for export file type.
4. Again, not comparing to 7. Just throwing a fact about FCPX when in use. the whole "background rendering" isn't true background rendering either. True background rendering wouldn't effect playback of the timeline from time to time as it does with me and many others that I have talked to (and those others may have had more RAM in their machines).
5. When it comes to the server issue, we have actually sorta figured a workaround. Copying the footage from the server to the local HDD. Still not anywhere near what Premiere or Avid is capable of. FCP6 was able to recognize footage on a server FCOL!
One of the professors here has told me that she will look into the agreement Disney made with Lucas. I told her specifically about your situation so we will see. No promises though.
does this change your plans for Pink five at all Trey?
speaking as someone who uses FCPX on a day by day basis, I can honestly say the program works; FOR WHAT WE NEED (sorta). We shoot everything in quicktime on SDHC or SDXC cards. We work on the previous generation of the iMac. We just copy the footage from the card to an external hard drive (We can't put footage on a server because FCPX won't recognize it.) I do everything in FCPX; cutting, audio (which takes some getting used to...) and all my color correction (why on Earth did Apple decide to use a color BOARD instead of a color WHEEL?). We export for the web using h.264 and to DVD. Once we are finished with the project, the raw footage goes bye-bye and the project is deleted. This is mainly due to the fact that we haven't found a good, cheap archiving solution other than external hard disks, and our budget is limited. It took some time to learn to edit fast in FCPX honestly. Once you learn the keyboard shortcuts, cutting can be a breeze, but that's true of any editing program.
coupla things to keep in mind:
1.my boss likes FCP, a lot
2. I do multicam quite frequently. FCPX can do this, but sync hasn't always been spot on in my experience (I know this because I am hearing impaired, and one of the skills you learn early on is to LIP READ like crazy))
3.we only work in quicktime 1920x1080i, 1280x720p, and SD formats, but we have to capture tape on a different software program.
4. DVD creation is laughable on FCPX. you have very little control over the dvd creation process.
5. FCPX outputs to a small number of file types. ProRes and h.264 being the main ones.
6. the software wants EVERYTHING to be prores. It really doesn't like anything else.
7. You can't "Instantly" work with your media, sure you have background processing, but you are really working with proxy files of your media while FCPX imports the file. Depending on what you asked FCPX to do to your media, it can take anywhere from a half an hour to 6 hours for your footage to import. (This is on an iMac 27" with 8 gigs of RAM from a generation ago). If I import something, I usually do so before lunch. Once I start the import process, I go to lunch, and my footage is imported and ready to work smoothly once I get back.
8. once you start working in the timeline, all background processes except transcoding pause until the timeline is idle. BTW, if you finish your edit, before FCPX has finished importing and transcoding, you can't export your project. It's the old pay now or pay later paradigm.
9. if you work in multi cam, I advise you to create proxy media. ( this will take some time depending on the number of clips and how long they are.) I once had to wait 10 hours for FCPX to create proxy files for a 4-camera, 2 hour clip.
10. The latest release of FCPX is good, but is still missing some key stuff. True external monitoring being one of the big ones.
11. Lower thirds, or any graphics of any kind really, are a joke in FCPX. You have your stock garbage sure, but it's garbage. If you really want something that works, you need to get motion. I've tried importing photoshop graphics into FCPX, and found that layered support is a joke. It changes the color of your graphics! I've settled for exporting to .png for FCPX.
I would not use FCPX on my own short film, documentary or long form narrative projects. Not even for commercial spots. If I were doing a news spot or story maybe; but again no external monitoring. The FCC and SMPTE have very specific parameters for broadcast signal, and I don't even know how FCPX holds up on that end.
If all you want to do is put stuff on the internet or do a family party or wedding or whatever, FCPX may be the right tool. Beyond that, you are very limited in what you can do.
why not do troy and prometheus next? by popular demand...
I'm looking to switch back to PC too. Gonna upgrade in 2014. If Apple doesn't do right for the mac pro, you can forget me ever purchasing a Mac again. Portable or otherwise. The iphone and ipad, maybe.
what would the point of getting 28 days later on Blu Ray be? It was shot on DV video for crying out loud!
I believe 1/60th os the 180 shutter for 30p. For 24p, it would need to be 1/48th. Which would mean that it would need to be 1/96th. I think my math is right... And according to Pete Jackson, the 48 fps is only for 3D.
since ya'll have finished the october scary stuff, can we get prometheus sometime soon?
You mention at the end of the Episode 1 com that nothing of import actually happens in the movie.
oh, god... I heard you say it on the show or between shows. I know for a fact that you said during the Episode 2 commentary that Episode 2 is better than Episode 1 by virtue of the fact that at least Episode 2 had something happen in it. Sorry you caught me with my trousers down...
I'm going to have to go back and listen to all the DIF's you've been in just to give you a proper citation...
Are we talking about plot? Or are we talking characters that are not changing? Explain yourself man! Trey, I'm looking at you because I've heard you say this every now and again.
and then make the desert ice cream topped with moondust!
I don't think it's necessarily conservative christian morals that drive the concept, just the filmmakers making a decision on their own.
I guess it just comes down to the Moral preferences of the filmmakers. For instance, James Cameron said in the T2 commentary that he has a problem with putting a gun in the hands of a kid in a movie. He thinks it's a moral line you shouldn't cross. Yet he'll easily put a gun in the hands of an adult. It's all the filmmakers preference in my mind.
So, where do you all stand on the whole HFR thing? do you want to keep 24fps and don't use anything higher or do you think doing 48fps or 60 fps are/is just the way to go? (I assume Dorkman will become a grammar nazi on that sentence, which is really okay right now.)
Right off the bat, I prefer 24fps. I like the feel of 24fps. I always felt that films should feel like a dream or a memory. Dreams and memories aren't as sharp as real life.
there's so much in this that feels like it was cut by a TV student... Way too many cuts as if you're cutting B-Roll for a news story for channel 4 in Detroit...
I really enjoyed this movie. Soooo much better than Inception. When I was discussing this film with a friend, I voiced only two gripes with the movie. 1. I wish we would have had more time developing the relationship between Bruce and his wife. Her death is such a huge part of Bruce's motivation, that she needed to be more of a part of the story. 2. We needed to see Bruce be affected by what he was about to do to the kid and his "mother" towards the end as JGL's character developed a bond with both of them. I just felt it would have made the finale that much stronger if they had done that.
oh,okay... I must be imagining things again.... time for my meds
did anyone pick up what Teague said the order they were going to do the next couple of movies from the Justin TV feed? I thought I heard them basically make a rough schedule for the coming weeks...
I saw Blair Witch in the Theater in Michigan near a wooded area. It didn't freak me out, but several of the other movie goer where scared of that wooded area afterwards. I think Blair witch is the only one of these found footage experiments that works because of the whole premise of going out there to shoot a documentary. The last scene of the movie was the only part that really freaked me out.
i think Eddie's mastered the art of being diplomatic about the topic
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by switch
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.