When more effort goes into the review than the movie...that requires commitment. You're obviously going to live 1000 years, so time ain't an issue.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by avatar
When more effort goes into the review than the movie...that requires commitment. You're obviously going to live 1000 years, so time ain't an issue.
Anyone watching HUMANS?
Robots are domestic servants, a British re-make of a Swedish series.
I watched the first six episodes, but ready to bail out.
None of the characters pass the PLINKETT test. The entire main family mopes about incessantly.
There's a rogue sentient robot sub-plot that's been done better in Blade Runner. Episode after episode, we're only drip-fed the back-story.
Is it just another allegory for slavery or discrimination? Even worse, I can easily see this descending into standard soap tropes.
On the plus side, some of the actors playing robots look reasonably convincing - almost in the uncanny valley.
There's so much that could be explored, but this series pulls its punches. It doesn't have the budget for world-building (the impact on the economy would be huge). The rules on what the robots are and aren't capable of aren't clear.
Awaiting the American remake of the British remake of the Swedish series...
Some updates on Dorkman's Facebook page. He's out and about, with the goal of doing ComicCon next year. There's a picture of him at Benihana.
So great to see him looking well.
Recent lecture by Steadman (consultant to the movie) here...
What? No, I'm not crying...
How can I throw Agora into the ring, fellas?
There was an idea floating around in cosmology (before Dark Energy was discovered in 1998) that if the universe didn't have enough energy to keep expanding, it would collapse in on itself again in a big crunch and this would somehow reverse the arrow of time. That idea was just speculative and is now obsolete anyway, but obviously the writer took this idea and ran with it.
In addition, there's a bit of Sliding Doors concept as well of alternative realities if a different decision had been made at a crucial moment in one's life.
Like Fight Club, great directorial flourishes. Every technique in the manual is on show. You could use it to illustrate a course on directing. Nice soundtrack too.
The most expensive movie to ever come out of Belgium, and no one's heard of it. Just like Agora, one of the most expensive Spanish movies ever made, and also no one's heard of that either. To help international box office, both are in English, but that didn't help.
You kids are so cute with your "heatwave".
Well, having lived in both countries, Australians are the wusses because they all have air conditioning. Poms have to endure the real 35 degrees without any protection, like real men.
They can do Jodorowsky's DUNE while they're at it, and why not Kubrick's NAPOLEON? He left enough notes.
That looks really intriguing. *Crosses fingers*
WARNING - don't watch the trailer. It gives away EVERYTHING.
The fight sequence from 18m:30s was the best part for me. Reminded me of Hot Shots 2 humour.
Awesome! He'll like that.
The Directors Series video essay continues... https://vimeo.com/channels/directorsseries/128163934
bullet3 wrote:BTW, in case people haven't watched this yet, this 2 hour talk with the cinematographer is extremely illuminating about the craziness of the production: https://vimeo.com/127381179
Amazing talk. Thanks for the link, I really love these behind the scenes stories.
Yes, just watched it too. Thanks for the link. There was quite a bit of green screen and stationery truck scenes after all, not just wire/harness removal. Fair enough. It's an exaggeration to say it was all shot practical, but still, a lot more practical than most tentpoles these days. Those new EDGE rigs were so smooth they had to put artificial movement in otherwise it looked like the War Rig was parked.
Extraordinary that the frame rates were as low as 8fps. And all the DSLRs they destroyed! and the grading on the day for night stuff is amazing. Anything is possible these days. Any thing can be made to look like happy hour now. And all that prep work for the 3D stuff - all forgotten.
And who was the actor that came 2.5 hours late to set each morning? Hardy? Late nights rehearsing with the five wives in the trailer?
I disagree. I would say it's so thoroughly different from the original films, both in terms of specific mythology and visuals, that there's pretty much no cross-over.
The brand MAD MAX is well-known (even by people that haven't seen the movies)... a car-based post-apocalyptic wasteland. That's all you need to know. Branding probably accounts for 80% of box office these days.
No one saw John Wick, but had it been exactly the same movie under the James Bond or Mission Impossible 'brands', I'm sure the box office would have been 5X+ as much.
It's like opera - there are only about 20-30 operas in the core repertoire that are resurrected each season. It's lately been criticised as a dead artform, or at least 'ossified'. There are occasional attempts to write new operas, but most of these are financially unsuccessful.
Similarly, in movie tentpoles, there are only about 20-30 brands: Terminator, Aliens, Star Wars, Star Trek, DC, Marvel, James Bond, Mission Impossible, Transformers, etc which are mined each season. Most attempts to launch new 'brands' are unsuccessful, so it's easier just to appropriate an existing one, whatever your story.
I hear there are going to be several more Mad Max movies now that this one is successful. And if Blade Runner 2 resurrects that brand, there'll no doubt be more of those.
The world-building without exposition was by far far far my absolute favorite thing about it!!!
That the characters just did stuff and behaved in such ways that we were expected to observe and figure things out...it made me wholly engage with the characters. I bought every one of them and their turnarounds and motivations just by paying attention.
To be fair, it got away with avoiding exposition because it appropriated the existing Mad Max franchise, which is well known, so it had less world building to do. Had it been an original stand-alone movie called 'Furiosa', we would have been subjected to the standard opening titles montage of news reports, headlines, mushroom clouds, etc and more of her backstory in flashback.
I also wonder what the box office would have been had it NOT been a Mad Max movie. We fans complain endlessly about sequels, remakes, reboots, etc, but when there are original new movies like Oblivion, Edge of Tomorrow, etc, they hardly break even.
I have my own fridge logic questions
1. How can you possibly carry 160 days worth of motorbike fuel? I reckon two days max, Max. Unless they're some hyper-efficient futuristic engine.
2. What planet are we on? 160 days x 80 miles an hour x 10 hours a day = 5 times around the Earth at the equator.
I liken it to The Raid as a come-from-nowhere non-stop action thriller that beats all the standard PG13 CGI from the Hollywood tentpole factory.
It was rated R, so no cuts for a lower rating. In fact, George Miller got his wife (an editor who had never cut an action film before) to edit the film because he didn't want it to look like just any other action film.
How the hell did a second or third tier director get $150M to make an R rated film? That's unheard of these days. Normally R-rated genre movies like Dredd are never given more than $50M, usually a lot less.
Actually Babe 2: Pig in the City (Miller never directed the first one, Babe) is very under-rated. The middle act gets very dark for a kid's film (even for an adult film) and caused quite a controversy when it came out for a disturbing dog-hanging scene that was deemed too not suitable for children. The chase around the canal sequence is a work of genius.
Fucking insane!
Exhilarating, grotesque, heart-pounding! Like an extended heavy metal road chase. The production design, stunts, costumes, make-up, stunts, special effects, and cinematography all felt like a breath of fresh air after all that Marvel crap.
For example, that sand-storm approach looked terrific, like a John Martin painting.
How the hell did they film it?! It just looks so over the top. Sorry Star Wars nerds, but Episode VII is gonna look like a lame cartoon by comparison.
My only gripe is that a couple of the third act action sequences were cut a little too fast - it was hard to take it all in. Perhaps they were cut for a lower rating (and will be restored in an UNRATED blu-ray release. As you guys have commented above, it definitely needs multiple viewings.
Highly recommended! 9.5/10 Best movie of the year so far, by far, and I would be most surprised if Terminator, Tomorrowland, Jurassic World, or Ep7 could come near it.
It got a round of applause in the cinema at the end, and that's pretty rare for a British audience.
Did anyone see Star Talk with Neil de Grasse Tyson and Christopher Nolan this week?
Terrible format - subtract advertising, intros, recaps, banal banter with comedian, etc and you're left with 5-10 minute interview, all chopped up into 2 sentence fragments. Tyson interviewing for the entire time would be better.
Nolan would be a great politician - doesn't say anything. Very bland interviewee. But heart in the right place when it comes to science.
Week 5 :: 1 :: avatar :: Mr Nobody
AVENGERS!!! Man, it was fuck'n awes----
Nah, just kidding, didn't see it. I'm gonna be that one asshole that's getting too old for this shit.
By coincidence, in my suggestion for next week's movie, AGORA, the Romans are struggling to keep order in Alexandria, where the new Christian religion is on the rise (and plays the threatening role that the Picts do in The Eagle).
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by avatar
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.