Keeping my love for T:TSCC quiet because of my desire for approval.
Anyway, I'm excited to listen to the episode before my Terminator Marathon next week. Should be fun.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Allison
Keeping my love for T:TSCC quiet because of my desire for approval.
Anyway, I'm excited to listen to the episode before my Terminator Marathon next week. Should be fun.
I'm sincerely curious as to what the difference in between Channing Tatum and Megan Fox and Ryan Reynolds and ScarJo.
Channing Tatum and Ryan Reynolds do not belong to a gender group that has historically been oppressed, otherized, and objectified. Idealized men are the powerful, complex people you want to be. Idealized women are things men want to fuck. Any other questions?
If the question at hand is "why can't women be sexy AND interesting, whole characters," the answer is because people will pay to see the movie either way and one is way easier to write.
Yeah, I'm thinking the solution might be to a) stop watching movies with shitty characters or b) call people out when they do this. Or should we just kind of go with it?
If the statement is "this provides bad role models to young women," you're a dick, because you saw all this as a kid and still grew up to be a feminist, but you assume everyone else is way more gullible and will flock to the path of Paris Hilton and Bella Swan.
Yeah, I did see all this as a kid. And I figured out at 17 that it might be bullshit. Just because I managed to see what I was internalizing doesn't mean everyone else will. There are a lot of young women (and young men) who see this stuff and do swallow it. That's why we're having this discussion. Because while I might be a feminist in spite of all this, not everyone is. It's a problem.
If the statement is "this is why women make less in the workplace," you got me, I have no idea why that happens and will accept any explanation as feasible.
Off topic but I'll bite since it's I'm writing about this for my anthropology final. It's explained in Paula England's “Devaluation and the Pay of Comparable Male and Female Occupations”,
Francine D Blau and Lawrence Khan's, "The Gender Pay Gap", Lisa Belkin's "The Opt Out Revolution", and Jerry Jacobs and Kathleen Gerson's "The Time Divide". Check 'em out.
I think that the portrayal of Tasha in The Avengers is pretty good, seeing as she exploits people assuming she is weak and feminine and uses it to get information. I like the subversion. However, the same cannot be said of her guest spots in other people's comics (look at you, Daredevil writers).
Megan Fox is an excellent name to bring to the discussion. Thoughts, everyone?
I also like Studio 60 and The Newsroom
I'm gonna need some elaboration on why. No judgement, I'm honestly curious.
I'm an atheist who likes Jesus Christ Superstar.
Same here. I still watch/listen to it all the time.
Whenever I hear Hobbit news these days I still expect it to be rumors about whether Jackson is returning. Those were a weird few months...
I guess I'll be that person and recommend George RR Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series.
Personally, I'm far more concerned with what people do rather than the words they say.
Those things overlap. If someone uses hateful/threatening speech, I am not sure if it will spill over into their actions.
My opinion on this is the same as my opinion on rape jokes: if they aren't yours, don't use them. I won't use racial slurs because I am white-passing. I will never have those words used against me so I don't fully understand the power they have. As the others have pointed out, there is no reason for us ('us' as in white/white-passing) to use it, so why risk hurting someone?
And I thought my thread about sexism and misogyny was getting annoying...
Allison wrote:I have become used to men in this industry saying disgusting things about women.
Sorry, but people seem to just want to be offended these days, and keen to want everyone to know that they're offended. I'd also be careful to actually read what people say and not just assume the attention-grabbing headline is right.
But as Stephen Fry likes to say....
"It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so fucking what?"
So yes, I do get offended occasionally (as stated on the commentary, Twilight's depiction of women offends me), but I also recognize that being offended is just a reaction of my ego when I am powerless to actively change something I have moral objection to.
Offended hasn’t got anything to do with it.
People have wounds. It's not about “taking offense.” If someone talks about my college being nerdy, I might be offended by that. Whatever. People who like comedy/anyone who has said something sexist or racist or homophobic seem to think the idea that “taking offense” is lame, and anyone can “offend” whenever he or she wants to.
But causing pain and mocking wounds is quite a different matter. And if people don't get that don’t get that, I have roughly zero time to hear others defending them.
That Patrice O'Neal thing was, to use the best adjective I have, gross. But it brings up an interesting point. He thinks joking about rape is okay because he has diabetes and jokes about it. I agree with this parallel. If you know what it is like to suffer from rape or assault, yeah, you can totally joke about it. If you are one of the 1 in 6 women (and 1 in 33 men) who have been brutally hurt, you do you. Whatever helps you heal, right? But I don't think it's funny for someone who has never known what rape or assault is like to make light of it. I wish I could find it funny. But I don't have that luxury.
So, yeah, RedX, I don't like being offended. It is fucking exhausting and I have things to do. Maybe the solution is for people to get their shit together instead of telling us to calm down.
Yeah, I'm glad Tony Harris's attitudes came to light so I can stop interacting with him or his work. I was responding to the idea that JG's post was clearly a joke.
I'm not sure how anyone who's read more of JG's stuff than that one post, or seen his films, could have taken that comic thing as anything other than a piss-take.
I have become used to men in this industry saying disgusting things about women. It's getting tough to seperate the horrible jokes and the horrible opinions.
As my friend put it last week: satire is meant to target the powerful, not the vulnerable. And jokes are supposed to be funny.
Interesting. Chris Braak wrote about what James Gunn could say on his blog just yesterday, and it's not far off Gunn's actual statement.
I remember reading that blog entry yesterday and loving it. This section is what resonates with me the most:
"I don’t know; what I do know is that I’m done with all this....
I am not interested any more, at all, in supporting the work of people that can’t figure this shit out.
Whatever, you guys. Whatever."
I don't want to feel "whatever" but sometimes I do. If James Gunn is sincere - and I really want to believe he is - does it cancel out what he did? And the damage he caused?
the sister-whore post guy
And there's your new nickname.
So if you don't want to pay to watch a movie, why should anyone make it? How WILL anyone make things without funding? Do you think that artists should not make money off of what they make? That's kind of a shitty opinion to have on a forum full of people who create.
Yes, Joss's portrayal of women may be flawed. But I'll put it to you, maybe it's us, as straight men, whose UNDERSTANDING of women is flawed, and constantly evolving.
I just read this to my Women and Pop Culture class and we all agree it is very well said. Your whole post was, but this stuck out to me.
I agree with you on a lot of things. I am too young to have seen anything like Deedee McCall's rape plot (and I'm glad I missed it) so I suppose I have higher standards in media. Joss did bring us closer to the finish line, although I maintain certain decisions of his have held us back.
I suppose the bigger problem here is when people give Joss a free pass because of the progress he helped make. "It's written Joss Whedon, though!" (as was said in the Avengers commentary) is not a valid defense against charges of sexism or misogyny or white-washing or any other problems in his work. If men's understanding of women is going to evolve anymore, they have to listen to the criticism and keep growing. I hope Joss - along Steven Moffat, James Gunn, Jeff Davis, etc. - can do that.
Zarban wrote:Batgirl.....
NO!
I hope you are not insulting the proud legacy of Barbara, Stephanie, and Cassandra.
Allison wrote:And when you think about it, many of the roles in Nolan's movies could be gender bent without affecting the plot in the least.
Oh, absolutely, but that's true of MOST genre films. (Tysto has joked on some of his Schwarzenegger commentaries that Judi Dench could have played Arnie's role; he mostly just shoots people.)
I like Nolan's movies. He's just not helping genre cinema be very diverse. I think probably the same kind of list could be made of ethnic minority characters. Somehow, there are more Chinese and black people in Harry Potter's Scotland than there are in Nolan's Gotham City.
Let it be noted that the al Ghuls were played by a white Irishman and a white Frenchwoman in Nolan's batverse. It's one thing not to write characters that are female or of color, it's another to go against those identities.
You know what show has been surprising me with representation? Elementary on CBS. I am consistently amazed that its New York actually looks like New York.
A good opening should have a somewhat narrative feel, perhaps with a personal connection (explaining why you are addressing this topic now).
This is a good point. I have read far too many pieces where, at the end, I am still wondering why I read it or why it was written in the first place. Both for narrative and non-narrative, I think you should make a point as why what you are saying matters.
Jimmy B wrote:Allison wrote:That Chris Nolan comment is frighteningly on point. I've seen every one of his movies except Memento, and I can only think of 3 women that make it through a movie alive. I'm disturbed that I never noticed this before.
Does that make him sexist, though? Think about all the men that die in his films too. It's a hell of a lot more than the amount of women who die.
No, but the fact that he writes crap female characters kind of does.
Here are ALL the named female characters in Nolan films:
In Memento, Sammy and Leonard's wives are dead (and actually don't have names). Natalie (Carrie-Anne Moss) betrays Leonard but also helps him in his investigation.
In Batman Begins, Martha Wayne is dead. Rachel Dawes does nothing but talk to Bruce about his feelings and get kidnapped. "Jessica" is a model Bruce is screwing. Barbara Gordon does nothing.
In The Prestige, Julia (Woverine's wife) dies tragically in act 1. Sarah (Batman's wife) kills herself in act 2. Olivia (ScarJo) is secretly working for the bad guy. Jess is just Batman's little daughter.
In The Dark Knight, Rachel Dawes does nothing but talk to Bruce about his feelings and get kidnapped and killed. Officer Ramirez is secretly working for the bad guy. Barbara Gordon does nothing. "Natascha" is a ballerina Bruce is screwing. Judge Surrillo exists only to get murdered.
In Inception, Ariadne BENDS A CITY and is told "Never do that!" and never does that or anything else but talk to Cobb about his feelings. Mal is dead and still manages to betray Cobb and generally fuck with all his plans. Phillipa is just Cobb's little daughter.
In The Dark Knight Rises, Selina Kyle is secretly working for the bad guy but then helps the good guy kick some ass. Miranda is secretly working for the bad guy. "Jen" is Selina's friend (and apparently is only credited with a name to make it clear that she's not Holly "Catgirl" Robinson.)
In retrospect, I should give Nolan credit for THREE rather than two types of female characters: furniture, corpses, and betrayers. These account for all 22 of the females characters, 4 of whom kill themselves.
Meanwhile, there are a dozen or more named male characters in each film (except the low budget Memento), and they often get to have real impact on the plot even when they are minor. (Think of Postlethwaite, Berenger, and JGL in Inception; Caine and Bowie in The Prestige; and Caine, Freeman, and Oldman in the Batmovies.)
Only in Insomnia, the one film Nolan directed but didn't write, does the female lead get to be a good guy all the way thru and come out on top. Plus there are several other named female characters.
Wow.
And when you think about it, many of the roles in Nolan's movies could be gender bent without affecting the plot in the least. Especially in Inception, there's no reason to have Ariadne be the only female and least active member of the team.
Michael Sheen is in the first 4 for maybe 15 minutes, I think? They are just some vampire counsil in a different country that the movies sometimes cut away to in between periods of non-events (all of the events, that is).
What did you guys do before a teenage girl joined this forum? Don't answer that.
Michael Sheen plays Aro, the leader of the Volturi. The Volturi are like the vampire police and are based in Italy. His appearances are in the 2nd, 4th, and 5th movie. His biggest parts are in 2 and 5.
Allison wrote:That Chris Nolan comment is frighteningly on point. I've seen every one of his movies except Memento, and I can only think of 3 women that make it through a movie alive. I'm disturbed that I never noticed this before.
Does that make him sexist, though? Think about all the men that die in his films too. It's a hell of a lot more than the amount of women who die.
I don't know if it makes him sexist? I am honestly wrestling with this and I think need more data points.
Allison wrote:Also, behold the inner thoughts one of Guardians of the Galaxy writers. You can taste the respect.
And did you read the comments? They all call the writer a pig. It's awesome.
OH, and Inception. I forgot Inception in that previous post. Talk about a piece a furniture... Ellen "Hard Candy" Page didn't get SHIT to do in that movie. But that's a Chris Nolan movie for you. He writes women as corpses and furniture. I bet, if you actually counted, close to half of all named female characters in Chris Nolan films are dead before the beginning of the movie and exist only in flashbacks and dreams.
Aaaaand the post on his site has been taken down, but is still available on Google Cache. Don't you love how the disgusting things that people say on the internet will never go away?
That Chris Nolan comment is frighteningly on point. I've seen every one of his movies except Memento, and I can only think of 3 women that make it through a movie alive. I'm disturbed that I never noticed this before.
Do you think that when this generation of movie goers starts making movies we'll get better characters?
Also, behold the inner thoughts one of Guardians of the Galaxy writers. You can taste the respect.
Also when I noticed that OSC is a homophobic asshat it kind of turned me off reading his books.
The worst thing is when good talent is given to horrible people.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Allison
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.