1,526

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Mmm, the erotic fanfiction I could write about that man...

1,527

(359 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm pretty psyched. As someone who is in no way a Star Trek fan, I have enough distance that I can get excited for this movie without all the "THIS ISN'T RODDENBERRY'S VISION!!!!!!" whining.

1,528

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

I can't put my finger on it. For my money, Serenity has a lot more rewatch value than Firefly.

1,529

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Couldn't care less how much it looks like Star Trek. I'd rather they do something new with the material than pander to fanboys by doing the same thing over again.

I've been really skeptical of 48 fps up to this point, but then I read this interview with Jackson, and he said something that convinced me a little more:

Peter Jackson wrote:

Why should we as an industry say that we achieved perfection in 1927? Why should we sit back on our haunches and laurels and say, "We got it right in 1927"? What are we talking about? The next 100 years? The next 200 years? That's what films have to be? We shouldn't be doing that. We should be looking at the dwindling audiences and the fact that kids aren't as excited about going to the cinema as we are or used to be when we were young. And how do we make it feel more exciting for them? To back into that experience again.

That's an interesting perspective that I hadn't thought of. In the same interview, he also says that he's spent so much time with 48 fps that he can't watch 24 fps anymore. He says he can't stand that format.

1,531

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Here's another unpopular opinion of mine: I like Serenity more than Firefly.

I mean, I like Firefly a lot. It's pretty special to me. But if given the choice, I'l watch Serenity before I'll watch any episode of Firefly.

1,532

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Japanese version of the trailer is the only one with the final 15 seconds. Wonder why that is. That final image scares me a little. Is it just an homage, or are they actually doing Wrath of Khan?

1,533

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

C-Spin wrote:

Except with Andrea. She continues to be the worst female character I can think of in television.

Every time she's on screen I want to die. They don't even use her well. She's just there for the Governor to grumble exposition at.

Oh, here's an unpopular opinion. I haven't read the comics, but on the show Michonne is maybe the worst character they've ever had. She has absolutely zero personality, and no motivation for anything that she does or feels. It feels like they're just assuming that people will love her because she was awesome in the comics. But she hasn't actually done anything yet.

1,534

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

MadBadCoyote wrote:
Mr. Pointy wrote:

Ewoks are adorable, and those who hate them are horrible, cynical, heartless bastards.

Agreed!

Also, I recently watched Season 1 of Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead.


My opinion on both: meh
(do either get any better?)

Breaking Bad, hell yes. Stick with it, it pays off. The Walking Dead? Debatable. Some people thought season 2 dragged, and I see where they're coming from. Season 3 has been phenomenal thus far, though.

1,535

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If an American politician did this, their opponents would immediately call them out for "cultural insensitivity towards Mayans."

Here's the list of sync points remaining to be found.

Phantom Menace
Starship Troopers
Hook
Wild Wild West
The Mask
The Abyss
Attack of the Clones
The Mist
Seven
Apollo 13
The Terminator
Fight Club
Terminator 2
Full Metal Jacket
Team America
Dark City
Galaxy Quest
Hulk
Revenge of the Sith
The Princess Bride
Nightmare Before Christmas
Ghostbusters 2
The Prestige
Orgazmo
Transformers
District 9
2001: A Space Odyssey
Up
A New Hope
Transformers 2
The Hurt Locker
Contact
Avatar
Sunshine
Constantine
300
Pan's Labyrinth
Master and Commander
Terminator 3
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
The Fountain
Dr. Strangelove
The Crow
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
The Truman Show
Armageddon
Surrogates
The Empire Strikes Back
Terminator Salvation
The Fifth Element
Moon
The Silence of the Lambs
The Blob
Dawn of the Dead 1978
Dawn of the Dead 2004
Monsters
Chinatown
2012
Explorers
2010: Moby Dick
Reservoir Dogs
Tron
Aladdin
The Sixth Sense
Return of the Jedi
Legion
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence
Twilight
Pulp Fiction
Mulholland Drive
Body Snatchers 1956
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
The Frighteners
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Pitch Black
Children of Men
Mystery Men
The Chronicles of Riddick
Strange Days
E.T.
War of the Worlds
Wanted
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
The Lost World: Jurassic Park
A Few Good Men
UHF
Sucker Punch
Howard the Duck
Planet Terror
The Shining
Slither
Body Snatchers 1978
Spider-Man 3
Priest
Tropic Thunder
Tron: Legacy
The Social Network
The Last Airbender
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Kick-Ass
Unforgiven
Source Code
Cowboys and Aliens
Cars
John Carter
Twister
Speed
The Blair Witch Project
Apollo 18
28 Days Later
The Avengers

Remember, the episode points should be for the moment that Teague says the "p" sound in "unpause," so that the sync is accurate. This isn't an exact science, so don't lose sleep over it, but try to get as close as you can.

http://i.imgur.com/v9wvB.jpg

But seriously.

Sweet! We're on a roll tonight!

Jimmy B wrote:

I didn't get a gif sad wink

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vrcpFhgnmUc/T1t_hGvF-ZI/AAAAAAAAA0k/UeDJNTrJyZQ/s1600/willy-wonka-you-get-nothing.gif


...





























































http://i.imgur.com/sKeyy.gif

Jen wrote:

Alright in no particular order other than how I grabbed them off the rack

V for Vendetta    DIF 13:57      Movie 00:14
X-Men    DIF 12:30     Movie 00:25
Matrix     DIF 6:47         Movie 00:16
Matrix: Reloaded     DIF 5:27      Movie 00:17
Matrix: Revolutions     DIF 6:20        Movie 00:16
Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl     DIF 9:03        Movie 00:14
Indiana Jones -
      Raiders of the Lost Ark    DIF 7:03     Movie ~00:11
      Temple of Doom   DIF 8:14     Movie ~00:09 (not real confident on that one)
      Last Crusade   DIF 7:50    Movie ~00:13
      Crystal Skull   DIF 7:36      Movie 00:09
Independence Day   DIF 6:45      Movie ~00:22

I have the first 2 Spidermans, but my DVD player revolted, so I'll get them if no one else does, but not tonight smile


http://i.imgur.com/IBmtB.gif

1,541

(28 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh my god, Good Omens is amazing. My favorite book of all time, probably.

Also, I read The Stranger this summer, and it hit me hard, man. Good stuff, there.

Owen Ward wrote:

Just a thought, the timecode is gonna differ depending on the format of the movie that the guys used. For instance, if they used a blu-ray copy to record a commentary - it wouldn't sync with the DVD copy due to the framerate.

It wouldn't be off by that much, though, right? A few seconds is relatively negligible.

Alrighty folks, I have added unpause points for every movie that I currently have at my disposal. It's not a lot. Now let's get some timecodes, people!

ANNOUNCEMENT: WIKI MISSION ONE IS A GO.

CODENAME: OPERATION COUNTDOWN

WIKI MISSION ONE DETAILS:

Q: What the fuck, Doc?

A: You know this whole Wiki thing? It's time to crowdsource some editing, bitches. I'm asking for recruits to assemble some information.

Q: What kind of information?

A: I'm glad you asked, forum member! You know that whole "pause/unpause point" thing that Teague's always doing? Well, the noble Jimmy B sent me a complete, comprehensive list of all the places in the movies that you pause/unpause at. He's awesome, props to him.

I made a list out of them. You know. Like you do. But as you'll notice, it's missing some key bits of information. Namely the timecodes in both the movies and the episodes when the unpause point occurs.

Q: So, are you saying...

A: Yes! I only have access to a handful of the many, many movies that DiF has done commentaries for. Getting the episode timecodes is easy, if time-consuming. Getting the movie timecodes? That's another story.

Q: So, Project Halp all over again?

A: Yes, but even simpler! Take a chunk of episodes, post both timecodes, and I'll put them in the Wiki. Easy as that, and the end result will be super cool.

Q: Which ones need to be done?

A: These ones!

Q: Are you insane?

A: http://i.imgur.com/2XRJ0.gif

1,545

(3 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I know! That's basically what the whole movie is like. "I don't know what's happening, but I'm having a blast!"

Growing up as a young cinephile, there was always a gaping hole in my film experience: the art house. See, there wasn’t an art house theater anywhere near where I lived. It was a long drive to the closest one, and since they were all movies for adults anyway I was never too interested. Still, not having art house or independent cinema as a presence in my life may have colored how I see movies now. I only ever went to an art house cinema once, because I couldn’t convince my parents to make the drive for a movie they didn’t even want to see. The point of this story is that, during this time, I’d see a lot of trailers for art house movies online. I’d get excited, but I realized that I wouldn’t ever get to see them. I still watched the trailers, though, because apparently I enjoyed having my spirit crushed.

So when I saw the trailer for Holy Motors on Apple Trailers, I got that same rise and fall inside me. “This movie looks amazing! Too bad I’ll never get to see it.” The mindset has stuck, even though I’m at college now, in a completely new environment. Imagine my surprise to find that it was playing for two weeks only at a tiny little art house theater in the city, just a bus ride away. I don’t think I’ve ever been more excited to see a movie in my life. I was excited for The Dark Knight Rises, yes, but I always knew that I was going to see that one at some point. I assumed that I would never get to see more of Holy Motors than that trailer. All of a sudden, here it was. There was an actual, real possibility that I would see it. This was unprecedented for me.

I tell you this so that you can understand my mindset when I walked into the theater. The theater itself was an adorable café/cinema combination, in a tiny building with a single screen. The theater itself had alternating rows of theater chairs and leather sofas. It was an odd experience, to say the least, and more than appropriate for such an odd film. I was practically humming with anticipation as I sat down. I still hadn’t fully processed that this was actually happening. I completely expected to love Holy Motors with all my heart and soul. I should have known better.

Did I love Holy Motors? Uh, to be honest, I have no clue. I can’t make heads or tails of this movie.

Really, I mean it. I’ve got a document on my computer with my rankings for the end of the year. I’ve got every movie I saw this year on a list from best to worst. And I looked at it without the slightest idea of where to put Holy Motors. I mean, I think I liked it? I certainly didn’t hate it. There’s nothing to hate about it, really, as I’ll get into in a moment. But man, if this isn’t the strangest movie I’ve ever seen. I expected to have to think about it, but this is above and beyond anything I anticipated. It isn’t confusing, but it is baffling. I understood what was going on (I think?) but I’m still not sure why anything that happened, well, happened. I kept waiting for the scene that would tie it all together, but each scene ended leaving only more questions. Is this a bad thing? No, not in the slightest. It just means that I have to put some brainpower into this thing.

I’ll say this, though. Regardless of what it all means, I had a great time watching it. I think that I reacted in exactly the ways that director Leos Carax intended. I laughed, clapped, and cringed exactly where he wanted me to. So that’s a success on the movie’s part. Holy Motors is hilarious in its balls-to-the-wall zaniness, but it never feels like you’re laughing at the movie. The movie is in on its own joke. It knows how ridiculous this all is, and that’s the point. This makes the genuinely dramatic moments all the more poignant.

The problem with Holy Motors, if there is one, is that there really aren’t any stakes involved. After a while, we realize that no matter what, no harm can befall Monsieur Oscar in this universe, because it’s all staged somehow. Riddling out what’s fake and what isn’t is one of the joys and frustrations of the movie. The stakes, therefore, have to be emotional, but because Oscar is always playing roles, it’s hard to get a handle on him.

But I think this is actually the point of the movie. I think that Holy Motors is, in its way, a love letter to acting, and an appreciation of the men and women whose job it is to be other people. The movie makes this literal in its device. Oscar drives around the city, playing roles in real life, affecting people for good or for ill. There’s one line that stuck out to me that seems to drive this point home. At one point in the film, Oscar says this to a girl who may or may not be his daughter: “Your punishment is to be yourself.” Is the movie saying that this is the ultimate punishment for an actor, being yourself? Is this why actors play roles to begin with, because being themselves is unbearable?

The acting in this film is phenomenal, and maybe that’s because the performers are all on board with this idea. Denis Lavant, as Oscar, is perhaps my newest acting hero. He gives one of the bravest performances I’ve ever seen in a movie. Very few actors would get on screen and do some of the things he does, but he does it without a second thought. The result is a complex, wildly ranged performance that should earn him a Best Actor nomination if there’s any justice in the world at all. Really, he’s playing more than ten different characters, each so different from the next that it would make a lesser actor’s head explode. Lavant handles the transitions with astounding grace, and he gives my favorite performance of the year by a longshot.

Speaking of favorites of the year, this is probably my favorite scene in a movie this year. It occurs halfway through the film with no into or outro, but it’s a total delight in every way.

So, am I baffled by Holy Motors? Sure. Do I love it? I still don’t know. There’s so much that I still haven’t figured out about it that it’s hard to say. It’s certainly stuck with me though. I can’t help but admire its sheer boldness, its brazen disregard of sense or sanity. It all feels so deliberate that I know it has to mean something, though. It wasn’t lazily thrown on the screen so that the director could get some attention for his “brilliant avant-garde vision,” it’s too meticulously constructed for that. Anyway, whatever it means, I’m sure having fun figuring it out. Holy Motors isn’t a movie where you can check your brain at the door, but it isn’t so distant as to not be entertaining. So I guess Holy Motors is kind of the perfect movie.

Huh. Didn’t expect to say that, either.

That's right, yes. Normally I have a thing about not shelling out for IMAX unless it was shot in the format (or specially formatted as with Skyfall), but hey. Star Trek.

1,548

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I actually don't like the song Live and Let Die that much. The chorus is great, but the song as a whole is kind of schizophrenic. It bounces all over the place in terms of tempo, style, and tone.

I'm going to see it in 70mm IMAX 3D the first time, because IMAX is cool and I want that Star Trek trailer! Then I'll see it in 48 fps 3D, because I want to give the format a fair shake. I don't think I'll like it, but I want to be able to join the conversation.

By the way, to further add to the confusion over this movie, some digital IMAX screens will have 48 fps, but the 70mm screens will not. There are like ten completely different formats to see this movie in. It's unprecedented.

1,550

(261 replies, posted in Episodes)

TheGreg wrote:

This is, inadvertently, my point in a nutshell. Content creators have an entitlement culture that says they deserve a living from what they do simply because they want it.

I cannot fathom how any living person could possibly say this with complete sincerity. Really. I don't get how you can say, "Oh, it's the people creating the content who are entitled! So what if hundreds of people did things in the real world to create a movie? The product isn't real, so they deserve nothing!"

I'll level with you here. If all I wanted to do in my life was make money, I probably wouldn't be studying film. I want to work in the film industry because it's what I like. I like creating art. It's what I do. BUT, this does not mean that the work that I or anyone puts into a film is negligible. Films don't spring out of the internet fully formed. They aren't just a bunch of ones and zeroes. Real people, with real families and real bills that need paying, worked in the real world to make that movie, which just so happens to be a digital file.

But no, I'm "entitled" because I dare to suggest that I should earn money from the work I do, because "you can't own an idea," and, "nothing is stolen when I torrent a movie." There's an "entitlement culture" among the people who work on movies for months on end, not the people who sit on the couch and watch them for two hours. Yeah. Sure.