1,601

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

bullet3 wrote:

I agree with this too. I don't like Stewart very much. He does way too much of just playing a ridiculous fox news clip and then making ridiculous faces and yelling.

Colbert is much better at actually being witty and satirical.

I like Stewart a lot more than Colbert, though I admire them both a great deal. Although it doesn't seem like it would be the case, Stewart is actually a lot more cutting and incisive in his criticism than Colbert is, because unlike Colbert he isn't hindered by having to play a character. Stewart makes points about the media that no one else on the planet is ever openly going to, and for that I can't help but love him.

1,602

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh, here's my most unpopular opinion. I think that Season 2 of Heroes is really good, and it gets a bad rap for no reason.

1,603

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

Radiohead is awesome. The problem is that they're an album band, not a song band. You can't just say, "Oh, I really like that one Radiohead song, I'll listen to it now." You really have to listen to an album as a whole, and then it really clicks. I was skeptical until I listened to Kid A, and that's a brilliant album.

Also, Teague, Thom Yorke actually has a beautiful singing voice. He's intentionally doing a weird thing with it because he wants the sound of the band to be dissonant and not angelic.

Also, I hated Dredd. Thought it was no different from any other terrible action movie that's out there.

As for my own unpopular opinion, I love the Paranormal Activity movies, even though the internet consensus is that they are all terrible. The fourth one is pretty weak, but the first three are really smart and well-made.

1,604

(27 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Honestly, when compared to the overt and blatant sexism in the earlier Bond films, Skyfall is practically feminist. But I see where you're coming from. I agree that Severine was kind of wasted as a character. If you're going to cry sexism, that's the place to start. All she does is stand around and be sexy, and then she gets killed just as a way for the bad guy to freak Bond out.

Eve, however, is a different story. I actually really like her arc, and I don't think what happens to her is an example of sexism. I think the writers saw it as a neat way to give Ms. Moneypenny a badass backstory, rather than it coming out of a subconscious thing for traditional gender roles. We know that she's not just a secretary, she's a more-than-capable field agent and a match for Bond when it comes to wit. I'm sure in the sequels she'll get more to do than sit behind a desk.

I do find the transition back to a male M interesting. Do younger moviegoers even remember a time when M wasn't Judi Dench? A few years ago, before I knew anything about Bond beyond Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, I was genuinely surprised to discover that M was a man in all the earlier films. It just never occurred to me that M wouldn't be a woman. That said, I'm really pleased with Ralph Fiennes in the role. Perfect casting there. Anyway, my point is that because the character of M was originally a man, I don't see Mallory taking the role as an example of sexism. Is M's death sexist? I don't know. It is odd that she'd be so completely useless in a gunfight. Yes, she's old, but so is Kincade, and she has far more experience in this world than, presumably, he does. But if you're going into this movie saying "M is going to die," there aren't a lot of better ways to go about it. I mean, seeing Judi Dench blazing away with an AK like Rambo might have come across as comical. At the end of the day, she's an old lady. Sure, she gets shot and dies. What more can you do, really?

Severine, though. The treatment of that character really bugs me for some reason. She's just so completely helpless, and the fact that Bond doesn't save her is unsettling.

C-Spin wrote:

Also, the Komodo dragons were shit.

Totally. Weakest effect in the movie. That whole scene is pretty ridiculous, actually. Do Komodo dragons actually eat people?

1,605

(27 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Zarban wrote:

And again the bad guy is rather dull (and one of ours*), with no notable henchmen. But we basically have NO villain for half the movie. And what was that shit about Bond being old and out of shape? Craig was rock hard and only 41; that's when Dalton and Brosnan STARTED, and younger than Moore before he made SEVEN pictures.

I saw that as more of a reference to the fact that Bond as a cultural icon is starting to become a bit stale and irrelevant. Although the success of Skyfall both as a movie and at the box office kind of negates that point entirely.

1,606

(126 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Same in 1972, Nixon's reelection. He won every state but Massachusetts.

1,607

(126 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Honestly, I'm feeling pretty optimistic about America's future. Maybe it's the legalization of gay marriage by popular vote in 4 states, but I feel like the tide is going to shift in a more moderate direction in Obama's second term. The GOP hopefully just realized that they need to run more moderates, and if they do, I'll feel much better about America's political climate.

Yes! Assassins makes a great point about Lincoln's legacy in that song. It bugs me that Mary Todd Lincoln says "No one's ever been loved so much by the people," in the trailer. Lincoln was HATED in his time. I hope the movie doesn't gloss over that.

1,609

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Hansen wrote:

But would people care if Jamie Lee Curtis showed up?

I would!  tongue But I see your point. Sigourney isn't a bad choice, but I disagree that she's the "only" choice.

1,610

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think that this movie does everything completely right until the moment that Sigourney Weaver steps out. On the commentary and in other places, Drew and Joss talk about how "Sigourney is the only person who could be The Director." But Jaime Lee Curtis is the obvious choice. I like Sigourney, but come on.

1,611

(3 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I liked Wreck-It Ralph, but I felt that its themes got lost in the endless subplots. Also, I didn't think it was that funny. This movie needed about five times more Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, in terms of humor and story construction.

That said, I loved all the characters. Vanellope, who was unbearable in the trailers, was irresistible in the movie itself. Also, when's the last time that an animated movie had such perfect casting? Seriously, these are the only actors who could play these roles.

1,612

(10 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I think you're looking at the movie wrong. Don't think of it as six separate stories. Think of it as one unified story. If you handed me each portion as a short film, yes, they seem undercooked. But as part of a cohesive whole, they're thematically resonant and the characters do have clear arcs. Cloud Atlas isn't an anthology, it's a single film, and a single story.

I disagree that each story is generic, forgettable, and uninteresting. I found all of the "stories" to be extremely engaging, which is surprising, because I knew how they ended, having read the book. I think that the Cavendish story is the weakest on-screen because the stakes aren't as high as what's being cut around it, but it's still fun to watch, and it has some great moments.

1,613

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

In this clip, one of the dwarves definitely pronounces it the "wrong" way. It's at about 25 seconds in.

1,614

(10 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Couldn't agree more. It's my favorite film of the year as well.

1,615

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

avatar wrote:

I liked how Gollum was a surprise. I didn't see any advance publicity photos of Gollum. They should have done that with King Kong as well.

Gollum was all over the trailers, though.

1,616

(27 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I think I speak for all of America when I say that I can't wait for Skyfall to come out here.

1,617

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Or if they want to shake things up, how about Howard Shore? A lot of his music is up to John Williams' standards, but he has a pretty different feel.

1,618

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Snail wrote:

Question: who would we be ok with as a new composer?
The only one I can think of is Michael Giacchino. Which brings us right back to J.J. and Bird.

Oh god, John Williams might not even be alive when this movie comes out. I really don't want to think about that.

1,619

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

I bet Disney releases the unaltered original trilogy on Blu-Ray. It's a smart move for them.

1,620

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:

Also, AVENGERS 2 and STAR WARS 7 will now come out the same summer.

Along with Justice League. And Avatar 2. And the last Hunger Games movie.

1,621

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Oh shit, I forgot about Indiana Jones. Where's that headed?

1,622

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

People were skeptical when Disney bought Marvel, and that turned out pretty damn well. Maybe Star Wars 7 will be a return to form.

1,623

(5 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sure those films are being made, but remember that most of them bombed. Even The Master didn't perform to expectations. For every Looper and Argo, there's a Dredd or Cloud Atlas. Maybe the few successes on that list can start a trend. I hope so, at least.

Never owned Blade Runner, so I picked up the new Blu-Ray yesterday. The transfer is phenomenal. It's the kind of thing you want to use to show off your home theater system. Oh, and the movie is cool too, I guess. There's a massive documentary called Dangerous Days. It's over three hours long, so I haven't dug deep into it yet, but it looks really comprehensive. For that alone, you should get this set if you like Blade Runner.

1,625

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'd love to hear an episode on Blue Velvet.