For the record, this is the best thread on the whole forum in my opinion in terms of amazingly useful knowledge.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by bullet3
For the record, this is the best thread on the whole forum in my opinion in terms of amazingly useful knowledge.
Sabotage
Look at that still above. Look at how awesome Arnie looks in this. That is a great action hero look. As it happens, everyone in the movie LOOKS authentically badass and memorable. All the ingredients are right there.
Just one problem - Written by Skip Woods.
Between Wolverine, A Good Day to Die Hard, and now Sabotage, I'm convinced Skip Woods may be the worst writer on the planet. It just boggles my mind at how he's able to take what should be a great movie and make it into an incomprehensible mess.
This movie is kind of fascinating, in that everyone involved EXCEPT for the writer seems to be on their A-game. Schwarzenegger shows he can totally handle a modern-day gritty action role, Olivia Williams is awesome as a hard-boiled southern cop, even Sam Fucking Worthington gives a solid performance here.
On top of that, this movie is unapologetically balls-to-the-wall brutally violent and hardcore.
I'm not exaggerating when I say that nearly every 30-seconds there's either an f-bomb dropped, tits on screen, or someones head getting shot point-blank. This is Crank levels of excess, including multiple civilians violently splattered in the cross-fire.
And yet it all ends up mostly wasted, because the script is kind of a clusterfuck, 3 completely different movies very awkwardly sandwiched together. The movie opens sort of like Predator, with a team of badasses who take down cartels. This could be a great movie on it's own, but instead, the majority of the runtime plays out as a DEA version of 10 Little Indians, but not very interesting. Then, when it feels like the movie has ended, it suddenly starts back up again for a 15 minute epilogue revenge mini-movie. Just baffling story structure choices throughout.
Still worth a watch as its a pretty interesting misfire all things considered, but it's a bummer to see so many good elements get fumbled.
WTF were they thinking? They look fucking ridiculous, uncanny-valley terrifying, and still totally fake. First off, making them gigantic is a weird choice. They're supposed to be fast, acrobatic ninjas, instead they look like the Hulk. I'm unconvinced a non-animated TMNT movie is something that ever was or is a good idea, but if they were gonna do it, they should should've at least done the Where the Wild Things approach and had guys in costumes with CGId faces approach.
What's really cool is allegedly how they shot a lot of the scenes of her picking up/stalking guys by having her actually just walk into a bar and filming real people and their interactions. I'm wondering how much of that comes across in the finished product.
I know I'm a decade late on this, but holy fuck Magnolia is an amazing movie. The amount of creativity and inventiveness in the filmmaking keeps you off balance and engaged so the whole 3 hours just fly by, and on top of that the performances are amazing. Why is John C Reilly stuck doing comedies when he's this compelling as a dramatic actor.
Was doing some long travelling so I've been catching up on 2 flicks I meant to see last year.
Prisoners - Amazing execution of a kinda contrived and manipulative script. Performances are all great, the lighting by Deakins is some of the best I've ever seen (Fincher ain't got nothing on this), but ultimately the movie feels very pointless to me. "Why did you tell me that story?" was my ultimate feeling on it.
American Hustle - Fun in stretches, and the 1st hour in particular is great, but this is really all over the place, unfocused, and tonally confused. The movie should be building to a tense conclusion, and that tension is almost completely absent. A lot of the characters feel caricatured, and Jennifer Lawrence in particular is grating as hell, and I have no idea why the hell she is even in this movie. You could cut her scenes in half and lose nothing. The "trying way too hard to be Goodfellas" comparison is very apt here.
Still, all that being said, it's not a bad movie at all, definitely watchable and pretty fun, just feels like it could've been something great with some revisions.
Senna is really fantastic. Much better than that Rush movie, which is about a very similar rivalry.
Teague wrote:Why did we[internet] get all "dig for the hidden answers" about this show in the first place, anyway?
Dude, I have NO clue. It was astounding to me as the show went on that people were drawing all these conclusions. It reminded me of when Zodiac came out and people were pissed that there was no conclusive ending to it, when the whole point of that film was about what going down a rabbit hole does to those characters.
I don't get it either guys. It's like the Lost crowd suddenly seized on this show as the next big "answer to everything in the universe". I think that approach to storytelling is frankly the worst, it leads to pulpy, shallow material that's all about concocting mysteries instead of telling a good story about people. That kind of bad tv writing was a plague throughout the 2000s and I'm glad we're finally starting to get weaned off it as a society.
Whatever, I'm glad it didn't use any of the terrible, convoluted, bullshit over-connected online theories.
A perfectly executed, straightforward character study detective story, with some cosmic horror overtones is exactly what I wanted, and is exactly what the show delivered.
Love the optimistic note at the end, a much better and less cynical version of the SEVEN closing narration.
I think they stuck the landing for the most part, really happy with the season as a whole.
Interesting. It would make sense, he got into this business in the early to mid-90s before color correction was a thing, so he would've had to learn how to do all of this practically.
Vern's bewildered take-down of the 1st movie when it came out is still my definitive go-to on why these movies are absolute garbage, on how the entire "but it's dumb fun" argument is complete bullshit trotted out by people who've allowed lowered standards to gradually deteriorate the quality of summer blockbusters: http://www.outlawvern.com/2007/07/03/transformers/
This is where Disney movies are just not for me. I remember watching Mulan in the theater when I was like 7 thinking this one might win me over and not be aimed at little children, and then it still under-cuts and underplays all the danger with the songs, and cartoony weakling "hero" soldiers, and dragon sidekick, and once again has a lame incompetent villain who's defeated too easily.
A shame cause Mulan would be an awesome female-empowerment role-model movie if they had the guts to make it even a bit more edgy. Does Mulan even kill anyone in the entire movie except the main villain?
I love the quiet conversation between Rust and Marty about what they've been up to, where you get the suggestion that
Thinking on it some more, it should really be treated more like the finale of Blade Runner, where the villain is articulate, and you kind of get where he's coming from. They should've ditched all the stupid make-up effects and just had him be a guy. Give him a chance to actually speak and interact with the crew, and then when it does turn into a "hide from the killer" situation, film it in a coherent way that conveys the geography of the situation and heightens tension.
It could absolutely be done in a way that worked, Danny Boyle just dropped the ball.
Upstream Colour boils down to people who watched it and people who pretended to like it!
Or maybe some of us just have the patience to stick with a movie for 90 minutes and see where it's going before declaring it "too boring, not enough exposition dialogue". It's the most pleasantly re-watchable movie of 2013.
No, it's too long and self-indulgent.
I've been on a Michael Mann kick lately, so I would submit Heat, The Insider, and Collateral as being utterly perfect. He spent the 80s figuring out and fine-tuning his style (Thief is good but sloppy and unfocused), had a crazy run for about 10 years, then got overly obsessed with story minimalism and shutter crime.
Rewatched The Insider again, as I try to do every year.
Still a fucking masterpiece and possibly the crowning achievement of the 90s as far as I'm concerned. This time in particular I noticed how amazing the cinematography is, the way Mann uses his edits and frame compositions. Stylistically, it really is one of the most powerful examples of filmmaking talent I've ever seen, taking a totally un-cinematic story and making it extremely tense and compelling.
Well America said No to the Pacific Rim approach, maybe they'll embrace this darker more realistic take on it
And I doubt that's what people want out of one of these films
Almost no US filmgoer has seen the uncut version of that film, so it's not on the radar. No matter what they do, I'm betting half the people say "that's not Godzilla".
I disagree, I think you greatly over-estimate people's cultural familiarity with Godzilla. My guess is 90% of US audiences have never seen a Godzilla movie, except for maybe the shitty Emerich version. They'll be far more open to a grounded, scary-movie tone than to a silly Pacific Rim-type approach.
Of course, we know that Godzilla fights other monsters in this movie, so audiences (myself included) might still hate it.
This could still be a Man of Steel situation where the trailers sell a bill of goods the movie doesn't deliver, so I remain cautious. The big issue is that this leans hard on city destruction porn, and I may just be over that stuff at this point. Characters/story has potential and there's some interesting images there, so I'm still giving it the benefit of the doubt.
We focus so much on Ghostbusters, but for me, Groundhog Day is the real unsung masterpiece of his career. It's like a beacon of the type of accessible, brilliant comedy that does not get made anymore. We're mostly stuck now with either super-dumbed down awful slapstick movies for the whole family, or R-rated comedies that rely on being as raunchy as possible for laughs.
His influence is deeply missed.
Table-setting for the final two, I'll let it slide. Next one looks like it's gonna be crazy given the preview.
It's hateable for how boring and generic it is, though it's true that it doesn't really do anything egregious. The panel didn't really get into this, but I'd forgive the confused lame storytelling choices if the action delivered, but it's an utterly lame action movie. It's like Blomkamp thought he was making an "important" movie so he didn't want it to be too action-oriented, so you get the worst of both worlds.
You don't turn down the opportunity to put Jodie Foster in your crazy R-rated sci-fi movie unless you're an idiot.
Too bad they didn't give her anything to work with.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by bullet3
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.