Weren't you guys doing "The Shining" instead of "Dawn of the Dead"?
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Doctor Submarine
Weren't you guys doing "The Shining" instead of "Dawn of the Dead"?
It's probably not a big deal. They've gotta have one for airline and network TV anyway; easy enough to drop it onto the DVD.
Besides, didn't Avatar have precisely one "shit" and one "bitch?"
As I recall, there were a couple "shit"s. ("shits"?) I don't remember any "bitch"s ("bitches"?), besides a "son of a bitch".
This 'family language audio track,' is this something they're doing these days?
Actually, from what I understand, this is a pretty new thing. I respect the fact that they included it.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0044XV3R8
I fell into the "hate it" crowd with this one just after the release, but DAMN this thing looks sexy. Like switch said above, Cameron's special editions are often far better than the original cuts. The Abyss is a great example. In the original script, that Earth opening was fantastic. It really grounded the film, and gave it more palpable stakes, stuff that was sorely lacking from the theatrical cut.
So, as surprised as I am to say this, I'm willing to give this one another shot. Cameron had never let me down before this, so I'll give him one more chance.
Anyway, off-topic, but really on-topic, you guys should totally do Zodiac. It's such a great film.
How about this:
Best Actor nominees influence the plot
Best Supporting Actors influence the charactersSilence of the Lamb up and moves to Lecter's jail cell so Foster can talk to him, just as Dark Knight follows Batman all the way to Hong Kong.
The Joker is never in control of the plot, he just shows up from time to time to distract Batman from his true goal.
Sure, I'll give you that one. It almost always holds true, apart from Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men.
DoctorSubmarine wrote:In my opinion, Lecter is just as important to the narrative as the Joker was. You may be able to tell just any old Batman story without the Joker, but not that Batman story.
Yes, but you couldn't tell ANY Batman story without Batman.
I know. My point is that the Joker was as necessary to the plot of The Dark Knight as Lecter was to Silence of the Lambs. It's perfectly possible for a film to have more than one leading male performer.
The male lead in DARK KNIGHT was Christian Bale, hence Ledger is supporting. If the male lead was not Anthony Hopkins in SILENCE, who was it?
It's not a matter of screen time, it's about their significance to the story. Hannibal Lecter is clearly the most important character in Clarice's story -- there IS no story without him. Likewise, you can tell a story about Batman without the Joker -- but not without Batman.
But let's take the alternate scenario from the Terminator: Salvation commentary. Let's say that Christian Bale only showed up for five minutes at the end (and some radio broadcasts), but the entire film centered around him. Without him, the story could not have taken place. And let's say that he really knocked it out of the park. Would he be eligible for a Best Actor award? I guess it has to do with perspective. In my opinion, Lecter is just as important to the narrative as the Joker was. You may be able to tell just any old Batman story without the Joker, but not that Batman story.
Don't get me wrong, I like this movie, but it never really scared me. Yes, the infamous "basement scene" is well-made and tense, but I never doubted that she would get out of there alive. I dunno, it never had any emotional hold over me for some reason.
That said, the movie is still great. Great performances all around, and some killer writing to boot.
P.S.
Anyone else think it's a little strange that Anthony Hopkins can win Best Actor for, what, 20 minutes of screentime, and Heath Ledger, who was easily on-screen as much as anyone else in The Dark Knight, won Best Supporting Actor? Hopkins is great, but he's far from the male lead.
1.) Audrey II from 'Little Shop of Horrors'. The first iteration that barely moved, so that it will fit inside my house. At parties, I'd get a friend to secretly puppeteer it just to freak people out.
2.) A T-800 from 'Terminator'. It would sit in my yard to scare away ne'er-do-wells.
3.) One of the journals from 'Se7en'. Half of it would be really freaky crazy-talk. The other half, I'm sure, would be little jokes scribbled in by crew members. Either way, a lot of fun to read.
4.) The mule from 'Serenity'. I love the ship itself, but the mule was friggin' badass. I'd spend hours reenacting the opening heist/escape.
5.) A sword from 'Seven Samurai'. Any one of them, really. They're all awesome in their own awesome ways.
Next: Top 5 movie props that would make you shit your pants in fear if you ever saw them in real life.
I believe the unwritten consensus on what qualifies as "classic" is at least 15 years, so yeah, those meet the criteria.
That and "I like it".
Few words can describe how much I love this movie. This is also the first commentary in a while for a movie that I actually own. (I have Empire, but only the special edition). So, I'm excited to give it a whirl.
My local movie theater has a bunch of 'classic' movie posters hanging all over the place. (I say 'classic' because it includes everything from "Jurassic Park" to "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles".) Anyway, I walked past the poster for "Silence of the Lambs" for YEARS before I noticed, "Holy shit there's a skull on the butterfly!". It was a few more years before, "HOLY SHIT THE SKULL IS MADE OF DEAD BODIES!".
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M … Commentary
That's right, I linked to you guys on TV Tropes. WHAT.
Alright, I was daydreaming today, and I happened to come up with an idea of what this movie should have been.
You can keep Reloaded, I have no problem with it...aside from the last sixty seconds. The "twist ending" is anticlimactic and it makes no sense. Have Neo be knocked out after (yes) disabling the Sentinels. Instead of the ending being the reveal of Bane as a bad guy, Neo wakes up on a steel bed in an enormous warehouse. Disoriented, he staggers around, and sees on the bed next to him...AGENT SMITH.
OH SHIT, THEY'RE IN A SECOND MATRIX.
You see, the machines created two Matrixes (Matrices?). They knew that the program was flawed, and that people would eventually break out. So they made the "real world" one of constant conflict, so that people would be too distracted to consider the obvious possibility that the "real world" wasn't real at all. The Agents were actually real people, programmed to play the part of the villain in the game that the machines had set up. Now, I know that the phrase "Neo and Smith work together to stop the bad guy" sounds terrible, and that's where someone else might take it, so I won't. Smith wakes up too, and he feels totally betrayed. He worked hard to attain his goals. He trusted his reality. Now, he's a pathetic human, no better than the ones he mocked and tortured for years. While Neo goes to find the true creator of The Matrices seeking answers, Smith goes to find him seeking revenge. It becomes a cat-and-mouse game between the two of them, and eventually they become less concerned with the true Architect than each other. Throughout, Neo explores the desolate, horrifying world that humanity has left behind. At the end, Neo reaches the true Architect, only to find him dead, with Smith waiting. Neo defeats him (somehow, still haven't worked out a battle scene in the real world). Neo comes to realize that there is nothing for humanity in reality. We lost. He uses his computer skills (you know, the ones that they set up in the first film that had no impact later on?) to personally reprogram the Matrices, making escape from either of them impossible. He assumes the role of the Architect, doomed to watch over his creation for eternity.
Whoa, don't know where that came from. I was just hoping to explain the orange code, and Neo's powers outside the Matrix, but then...THAT.
DAMN. I'm working. Excited for the podcast whenever it comes out, though!
But for the most part I agree. My biggest problem is why in the hell does Skynet know/care who kyle or John conner is. The only person who knows he is the saviour is him. Unless he got drunk one night and started bragging to a vending machine to try and get it into bed.
You know, that's a great point. At that point in the timeline, Connor is still just a grunt who has no real power or influence in the military. He isn't the Commander in Chief, he's just a soldier who talks on the radio a lot. Unless Skynet views all of time and space as one, they shouldn't have any interest in him, let alone Kyle. I like the idea of Connor early on, as just a soldier, but you can't have that AND a conventional Terminator plot. AND the Marcus stuff. All of those things could work, but you need to give them each room to breathe.
In my opinion, Connor shouldn't have even been in this film. It should have been strictly about Marcus and Kyle. Oh, sure, we can hear him talk on the radio once, and allude to his presence a couple of times, but he has no character arc in this movie, and therefore no reason to be in it at all.
I don't know why this Frank Darabont adaptation of "Fahrenheit 451" hasn't been made yet, but I want to punch the man responsible. I always imagined the book to be, at heart, an action movie under a mask of social commentary, and Darabont brings out the best of both of those.
EDIT: And how about this Joss Whedon script, which can best be described as "Die Hard on a Bridge"? It isn't great, but it's a lot of fun to read.
Oh, I wasn't being funny either. It is extremely dense. Years from now, high schools nationwide will be teaching AP "A Topiary".
"A Topiary" defies the word "dense". One "A Topiary" is equal to seventeen "denses".
Director: Akira Kurosawa
1.) The "moving forest" scene near the end of "Throne of Blood". Totally chilling, and one of the most powerful disbelief-suspending scenes in history.
2.) The entire "Bandit's Story" section of "Rashoman". This may be partly for Toshiro Mifune's performance, but the whole scene is also shot tremendously. This was one of the first times that I noticed how important cinematography is to a film.
3.) "Seven Samurai": Kyuzo steals a gun. If there is one thing that Kurosawa does better than anyone else, it's crafting characters. Truthfully, we didn't really need this scene. Most other directors would have left it on the cutting room floor, considering it a waste of time. However, Kurosawa considered the character to be important, even if the plot didn't. Everyone in that film is a real person, with a real life, and real problems. That tiny characterization just proves to exemplify that.
4.) "Ikiru": The "swing scene". If you haven't seen this film, then I refuse to tell you why this moment is so beautiful. Go watch this movie immediately.
5.) "Dreams": "The Tunnel". This sequence is, frankly, one of the most terrifying things ever put to film. Plenty of films have tried to give us a realistic, psychological profile of a soldier, but none have gone as deep. By literally delving into the nightmare of a soldier who has returned from war, we get a great understanding of why those people often become so disturbed. What we see is scary, and Kurosawa knows it.
Sorry for invading the thread with my nerdiness.
NEXT TIME: Top 5 Morgan Freeman characters you'd like to have a drink with.
Alright, I need something confirmed by those much smarter than I.
One of my teachers at school started randomly talking about Fight Club and brought up the fact that the sex scene was done completely digitally...to which I replied with a wonderfully blank stare.
I could see why they would do it digitally, but I have no clue if it's true.
Any one have any ideas?
You know, I saw again the other night, and looking back on it, that sounds totally plausible.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. If I'm going to be stuck on an island, I might as well find something to laugh about.
Good one. I have all five books in one. Does that count?
I actually saw Surrogates in the theater, but only because that movie 9, which my friends all wanted to see, wasn't showing. I remember thinking at the time that it was passable schlock, but looking back on it now, it was hilarious.
Just published this list to the A and B teams of Down in Front, as "movies suggested here that we have yet to do, that I think could be good for commentaries."
Just sayin': these are on our radar and bound to happen eventually. No particular order.
Mystery Men
Be Kind Rewind
Tropic Thunder
The Frighteners
Moon
Hitchhiker's Guide
The Sandlot
The Patriot
Bicentennial Man
Brazil
A Clockwork Orange
Citizen Kane
Primer
Domino
Man on Fire
Eternal Sunshine
Twiiiiiliiiiighhhttttt
Children of Men
The Black Hole (Harrell and Zarban felt strongly about this one)
The Truman Show
K-PAX
Kill Bills
Iron Man
Indiana Jones
Batman
Real Genius
Chinatown
Silence of the Lambs
Rocky Horror
A Few Good Men
Space Cowboys
Pitch Black
Black Hawk Down
Toy Story
The Professional
The Aviator
Adaptation
Synecdoche, NY
The Rocketeer
Office Space
The Fifth Element
Flight of the Navigator
V for Vendetta
Top Gun
A.I.
The Dark Knight
Wanted (hate this movie)
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
Hellboy
Memento
It is very important to me that you do Moon and Memento, seeing as how great both those movies are. I feel like the Office Space commentary would just be a bunch of laughing. As for Twilight...it'd be a fun live show, let's leave it at that.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Doctor Submarine
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.