1

(48 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'd say Giacchino's score for ST is quite good and even rousing, but it probably doesn't stand up tot eh best ST film scores. That said, scoring trends change, and I'm not sure you could get by with some of the old ST film scores now.

I think Giacchino's score for John Carter is better than his ST score. I like it a lot.

2

(48 replies, posted in Episodes)

One of my favorite film score moments is actually an un-scored moment: the T-Rex attack on the SUVs in Jurassic Park. Not a note of music in that whole sequence, and it's a great example of how sometimes less (or none) is more.

Worst bit of scoring in my recent experience: John Williams's work on "Lincoln", wherein he felt obligated to interrupt Daniel Day-Lewis' brilliant performances with musical cues to remind us that DDL was saying something important and poignant.

3

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

Disney has SW films planned that will be outside the story of the new trilogy.
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/26145/ … -off-films

One rumor: a Yoda movie.
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/26128/ … s-a-biopic

4

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

I can't help but wonder what these films will be rated. I'm hoping for PG. SW doesn't need to be PG-13, does it? It seems how PG-13 is becoming the new PG in a way. More and more parents are letting their kids see PG-13 stuff, because that's what all the super-hero movies and the like are rated.

5

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

Also: I wonder if this means we'll get Giachinno on the score. I think he's excellent, so I'd be very happy with that.

6

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm pretty happy with the Abrams choice. Abrams seems perfectly happy to sacrifice sensible plot at the altar of character drama and emotional momentum, and that is SW in a nutshell. You guys pointed out the plot weirdness in Super 8, and ST's plot was a pile of nonsense, but they both score highly because of their commitment to their characters and to the kinetic story energy.

I watched ANH recntly on a bad tv with bad sound, and was struck by two strengths that shine through were the kinetic energy thing and what i can only call sincerity or heartfelt earnestness. The prequels had some earnestness, but none of it was heartfelt. Abrams seems to love actors and characters, and Super 8 and ST both have a real sincerity to them. Also, his not-too-reverent understanding of nostalgia should serve him well on SW, too.

Good point about how we can look forward to fewer cgi sets. I hadn't thought of that, but man is that encouraging!

7

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Finally finished the ep. I think the assessment of Abrams' "ouvre" (too fancy?) was spot on. He knows how to make a movie that FEELS right, and doesn't seem to care a whole lot whether it makes nuts-and-bolts sense.

8

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

One of the things that really struck me about Super 8: one of the ways that it achieves it's late-'70s, early-'80s feel is how real the sets and locations feel. When you think of ET, one of the things you think of is realness of the suburban California setting and family life.

On the common characteristics in Abrams' films: he seems to have a genuine sense of fun and a respect for the roots of the material, and knows how to infuse a film with that.

9

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've seen a lot of weak, lame, or even awful sci-fi and fantasy movies, and John Carter is NOT one of those.

10

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

John Carter. Because...yeah. LOTS to go on about there.