1

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Thank you, that does come in handy if the site goes down again. I can probably help with the cataloguing at some point as I've been spending a lot of time figuring out episode numbers (fun fact: the original Sorcerer's Stone commentary is counted internally as episode 118).

2

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So the site died and is back again...yay! Now I'm trying to download and archive all the podcasts. I have some questions:
1.) Why were the two unreleased podcasts (New Moon and Zombieland) unreleased? And when were they actually recorded and/or planned to be released?
2.) Is there any sort of internal numbering list for episode numbers? I ask because I'm trying to number all the episodes as I download them, but it seems there's no way to be sure what counts as a numbered episode and what doesn't. For example the "Changes to Come" 2 minute announcement (that "DIF" could no longer be used as a name) actually has metadata that labels it as the 178th episode. I wouldn't have numbered it as an episode myself, but that makes me wonder if the "Third Anniversary Announcement" also counts as an episode or if "The Potter Announcement" counts as an episode?. If Malariathon 1 is supposed to be episode 200, then all three of these "announcement" podcasts cannot be numbered episodes.

I'm probably being too pedantic, but any insight would be appreciated and helpful as I try to properly label everything I download.

3

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If you pause at 3:31, it's Ewan McGregor with his episode 2 hair. But yeah this was a cool video. Progressively, these music videos showed less and less behind-the-scenes footage. This one has footage of both the production and Williams conducting. The episode 2 music video only has the Williams footage. And the episode 3 one has nothing from behind-the-scenes and only has movie footage.

4

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Mike Verta talking about his private Star Wars restoration and some of the interesting techniques he used (for 3.5 hours!):

5

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TPM was shot on 35mm, but weren't the VFX shots scanned in at 2k and then printed back onto film? And since there's a lot of VFX shots, I'd guess that most of the film's negative only has 2k worth of resolution anyway. Though it is possible that they went back to camera negatives, scanned those in at 4k, and then re-composited the CGI, but I don't know if the old software they used would even work on today's computers.

6

(37 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Besides revisiting the next two prequels, I have another commentary idea: the original trilogy special editions! If I recall, the original DIF/FIYH commentaries were (rightfully) for the theatrical versions. But it would be neat to hear everyone's thoughts on the special edition changes and how well (or not well) they blend with the original VFX.

7

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)


The kind of insight they give sort of reminds me of a DIF/FIYH podcast. And they actually even showed a clip from one of Ryan Wieber's old lightsaber tutorials (at 8:37).

8

(37 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There was a discussion about the term "Sith" in this commentary. I think you guys agreed that the term was known from supplementary material from the original trilogy, but wasn't clearly defined and portrayed in the movies until the prequels.

Here's a deleted scene I found from the original movie that shows that "Sith Lord" was a term that was actually used and filmed back in 1977: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Erf6s_wYJk . I wonder how closely George's original concept of Sith Lords lines up with what they ultimately became in the prequels.

9

(37 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What a treat! Thanks for doing this commentary guys! Teague, you haven't lost a step at all with the classic DIF/FIYH sync point instructions.

I haven't finished listening to it yet, but I'm really enjoying how you guys approached it from the lens of "What are our opinions on this thing before the internet told us to hate it?". Because my suspicion has long been that people typically thought The Phantom Menace was a fun movie, but had big problems with the next two. Speaking of which, I hope we get another commentary on Attack of the Clones in the future with this same kind of lens (although I don't think any kind of lens will be able to save that one from scrutiny)........Oh, and what did you guys think about The Last Jedi?

And about the Jedi robes discussion, although Obi-Wan's and Owen's robes look kind of similar in the original movie, Obi-Wan's are much closer in appearance to samurai robes (longer cloak that goes down to feet, huge sleeves), and Lucas did take inspiration from those Kurosawa samurai films. At some point though, I think he did want to make the Jedi have outfits similar to Luke's in ROTJ, but may have just decided to revert back to his original inspiration for what the Jedi were.

Oh and I think Ryan has become the new Trey with his interesting personal anecdotes.

Teague wrote:

1) I do think this argument could be effectively made in less time than I took to make it — especially with editing.

2) So, sorry.

3) Hey, I told you the previous ramblings were two hours long!

4) I'm pretty sure "ugh, I really need to plan / edit this better" was the reason it kept never-getting-done before.

It's all good! I just enjoyed hearing you talk about stuff again. FWIW, I also tend to procrastinate a lot for a similar reason ("I could do this better").

8) If y'all have thoughts that'll help me develop this bullshit further, definitely share them. Stuff that seems totally superfluous to the argument (in which case I failed to clarify why I think it's relevant, which... almost certainly happened repeatedly, because improvised argument), or stuff that seems especially convincing, etc.. I'm quite happy, but not totally surprised, that folks seem to agree with the general givens I'm talkin' about; what I was mostly curious about was how far from the pack I've strayed in terms of the specifics.

Amidst a lot of great ideas, I think the biggest thing to improve the flow of the argument is to organize some of the points in a more natural manner. I think most of the stuff you said works. But I bet if you went back and rewatched the video, you could probably start to realize what points you could re-shuffle to different locations, or which points seemed a little unrelated to what you were previously saying. I think it could help to try and boil your point down to a single thesis and then make sure everything you're saying is helping to develop that thesis.

One point that I sort of got, but seemed a bit disconnected was the idea that a group of people getting together and doing the same thing leads to that feeling of satisfaction. I think you were trying to give an example of another phenomenon that could lead to the dopaminergic high you had alluded to earlier. Even though I understood it, it felt a little unrelated to the idea of intentional art optimization because it's more of a phenomenon that we observe.

One point I really liked was the analogy between candy vs. a full meal (I forget which specific food you mentioned). But I instantly understood that as the difference between immediate (but cheap) satisfaction vs. somewhat delayed (but higher quality) satisfaction. I also really liked the dopamine analogy and how more is required to achieve the same "high". Both of these really paint a clear picture as to what companies are trying to achieve with their optimization techniques.

Art optimization seems to be present in every aspect of entertainment and I definitely feel the fatigue. In the movie world, I used to enjoy superhero movies in the early 2000's. The genre at the time wasn't new, but studios hadn't systematically gotten those movies down to a cold formula. And so things still felt fresh. Now I feel the fatigue of similar types of "charming" characters, similar pacing, similar editing, and similar color grading.

I bet no one here watches the show Survivor (that show is still on?), but I've been watching for nearly two decades. I still enjoy the show but even a reality show is not immune to optimization. There are certain elements of the game that have evolved seemingly to keep the audience more superficially entertained. There was a hidden immunity idol that made for a thrilling moment last season? Let's put in more of them! Let's throw in multiple hidden advantages! Let's swap the tribes multiple times! Let's do everything we can to create surface-level excitement at the expense of conveying a real and genuine experience. I still enjoy the show though because the social dynamics are fascinating enough despite the "optimized" nature of everything else.

This is even true of movie documentaries. Remember "The Beginning", a documentary on the DVD of The Phantom Menace? It was so raw and so fresh. Then, as the prequel movies went on, these documentaries became edited with more and more intention. By the time we got to The Force Awakens, one might get the feeling that everything was great & everybody got along fantastically while making that movie (even though we know that's not the case). Although here, the optimization is not so much about the dopamine, but rather about the most efficient way to use the documentaries as propaganda.

Hell, even YouTube is not immune to this. The most successful YouTubers nowadays have gotten things down to a formula. They'll be talking to the camera with quick cuts as they move from topic to topic. They'll have someone off camera that they have "banter" with to give the appearance of authenticity. They'll insert multiple "calls to action" in their videos (remember to subscribe......hit that subscribe button......rate, comment, and subscribe if you like this video....etc.).

In general, things seem much more fresh and natural when they're just starting out. But it doesn't take long before companies or creators start to embark on that path of "optimization". It's not always bad though. But past a certain threshold (which is different from person to person), it becomes noticeable, tiring, and......unappealing.

Boter wrote:

I... feel bad that I couldn't get through it, I got lost after about fifteen minutes. I must be part of the problem sad Will attempt to give it another go, or download the audio and throw it on my phone for a longer drive maybe.

Personally, I'm not all that knowledgeable about music theory or music history, so some parts of that got a little confusing for me. But the main point was still very fascinating. I think he might need to get an editor to tighten up his videos to allow for better audience retention in the future......I kid! Un-optimized Teague is lots of fun to listen to haha. (It sort of reminds me of when everyone used to talk over each other on the early DIF commentaries. It felt so real and raw! Then it became more optimized over time as they realized how things are "supposed to be". There's no escaping optimization. Even when it's not an intentionally calculated move, it still ends up happening.)

^^ I feel the same way. I could totally see it being a discussion topic on The Intermission.

13

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There are unaired episodes?! I would love to have those haha
https://i.imgflip.com/2j4xbq.jpg

14

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If anyone needs their DIF/FIYH fix while waiting for the podcasts to be reuploaded, the Wayback Machine actually has the Episode I commentary archived! : https://web.archive.org/web/20111105011 … 09-TPM.mp3

15

(39 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Wayback only archived the main forum page for August 2018. The latest for any of the subforums is February 2018. And even then, it didn't actually archive any of the threads, so it probably won't be much help unfortunately.

Still, thanks for keeping the forum running! I'll always be a big fan of the podcast and it's nice that this place exists.

16

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Mike, hearing you talk about & analyze movies on these commentaries has been a big part of my life so I'm really glad to see that you're doing much better and even posting here again.

P.S. maybe you can convince Teague to do some more podcasts haha

17

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I was listening to the N64 podcast and, coincidentally, I also got Mario Kart 64 as my first game despite wanting Super Mario 64. Great system.

18

(152 replies, posted in Episodes)

The Extended Edition reunion really did feel like old times again. But yeah, I'd love to hear new podcasts as well. Even if they're not commentaries, other types of podcasts would be cool too. Like maybe something talking about the state of movies today, or a new Uncomposed about modern film scores (I loved reading Alex's write-up about The Force Awakens' score), or even (and this was mentioned a while back) a podcast about color grading in movies would be fun.....if they want to do it of course.

They're apparently making a 5th season of Prison Break.

I would totally listen to a "color in film" podcast. It would also be neat to hear about the reasons why some films have different color grading on DVD/Bluray from their theatrical release.

21

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh true, I'd almost forgotten about that post. Very enlightening stuff.

22

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I have a question about one of the things mentioned in the TFA commentary. It was said that John Williams didn't score it to picture like he did with the previous Star Wars movies. Is there a source for this? Or is it just inside knowledge?

23

(649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

That was a nice podcast. It was like a reunion with old friends....in my head (I promise I don't have schizophrenia).

But seriously, it would be awesome to have the FIYH guest starring in Extended Edition podcasts every once in a while. I'm not even in the movie business, but I love hearing all the analysis and insight.

24

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm not sure that you're really contesting the "verdict" though. It seems like you're just criticizing other peoples' criticism. Which is fine, I guess, if that's your goal.

But the crux of the matter is that when we watch a movie, we leave the theater feeling a certain way. We can like it, love it, hate it, not care about it, etc. And then we attempt to articulate this feeling into words; this is known as criticism.

All you're doing is refuting the criticisms that people had with these movies. And that doesn't accomplish much since it's not really changing people's feelings towards them. Like if I were to call AOTC boring and you refute that with "That's wrong because of scenes X, Y, and Z, which were all really interesting", then have your points really made me reconsider my stance on AOTC? Of course not! Because when I watch it, I still find it boring no matter how much "evidence" you can find that "proves" otherwise. So I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to accomplish.

25

(372 replies, posted in Off Topic)

My arguments are:

Qui-Gon does have character traits beyond "stoic":
A.) strongly opinionated (insists that Anakin is the Chosen One)
B.) stubborn (insists on training Anakin despite everyone saying it's a bad idea)
C.) defiant & breaks the rules (defies the Council & decides to train Anakin, uses the Force to fix the Watto deal to his advantage, suggests leaving the Queen in the dark when informed that she may not agree with his methods)

I can still be entertained by the prequels, although they're largely disappointing compared to the original trilogy.
Also, I find AOTC to be more boring than the others: couch scene on Courascant, Dexter Jettster scene, library scene, youngling scene, discovering the Kamino clone army, spying on the Separatist meeting, and all the Naboo scenes with Anakin & Padme.

Although, to be fair, I did like the Tatooine stuff and the early parts of the Geonosis sequence when they were fighting the creatures.