1 (edited by Abbie 2017-03-17 21:17:17)

Topic: Beauty and the Beast (2017) [Spoilers if you haven't seen the 1991 one

Thumbs up +2 Thumbs down

Re: Beauty and the Beast (2017) [Spoilers if you haven't seen the 1991 one

This made me angry, and I never even had any intention of watching this movie.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Beauty and the Beast (2017) [Spoilers if you haven't seen the 1991 one

Yeah, I got dragged to it against my will and ended up just staring at the upper right corner of the screen for the last hour. I have never actually just stopped watching a movie in the theatre before but I couldn't take it.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Beauty and the Beast (2017) [Spoilers if you haven't seen the 1991 one

I have not seen this one, so ultimately I cannot comment on it in the grand scheme. I have, however, seen the original numerous times and absolutely love it. It was one of my favorite disney movies growing up, and still continues to be. My wife recently saw the new one and thought it was fine, but didn't love it.

I can say I agree that musicals in general are no different from any story. Whatever is happening on screen has to be for some sort of reason. If they're singing a song, why are they singing a song now instead of earlier? Typical musical format would say you put the important character-building or plot-furthering points in musical numbers. The music are the dots, the non-music is connecting the dots. I think that works.

My issue with this movie (and again, I have no seen it so I cannot say for sure) is the same issue that I have with the Broadway version: Not all the songs are from the original. That part is fine. But it's clear which are Menken and which were tacked on to make it different/longer.

Other feedback I've heard about the movie: Emma Watson is fine, but her singing voice isn't up to par with the rest of the cast and sticks out (especially next to Dan Stevens).

"I solemnly swear I am up to no good." - Han Solo, Terminator 2: With a Vengeance