51

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

I went to an Alien marathon last night and the print used for Alien was pretty horrible. It's been a long time since I've seen actual film being projected, so it wasn't the best reintroduction.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Thumbs up Thumbs down

54

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Thumbs up +2 Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

On a more positive note, I will say I recently got to see The Master projected in 70mm and it was absolutely gorgeous. Reminded me how I do kinda miss real film projection, something about just hearing the quiet hum of the projector, the bright vibrant look of that image is really special to me.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

I saw Master in 70 as well at the arclight and goddamn did it look gorgeous.  They depth of field was roughly the width of a nose hair and you could see different PARTS of a persons face just slightly out of focus.  To me there is a strange, literal, alchemy with film that I'm not quite sure digital can be fully capable of replicating in my lifetime.   Not saying most films shouldn't be digital, and I dont hate digital at all, I just think there will always be a place for actual film.

Eddie Doty

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

i think Eddie's mastered the art of being diplomatic about the topic

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital

I think there'll always be a place for diplomacy.
  - some random person, but we'll say it was Gandhi

Re: #28 - Film vs Digital