Re: Star Trek

Ohmygodthat'sawesome.

If I levitate because I just got punched in the face in slow motion, it's a Hong Kong kung fu film.

If I levitate because I just met a cute girl, it's a rom-com.

If I levitate because I just met a cute lesbian while my roommate draws comic books passive-aggressively, it's a Kevin Smith rom-com.

If I levitate six inches above a horse, it's a western.

If I levitate in black-and-white while speaking Swedish, it's a Bergman film.

If I levitate and the camera focuses intently on my combat boots, it's a Cameron film.

If I levitate and the camera focuses intently on my bare feet and I'm also a 21-year-old girl, it's a Joss Whedon film.

If I levitate for absolutely no goddamn reason while country music plays on a broken radio and a midget personifies my fears, it's a David Lynch film.

Brian, you have just provided the mechanism by which we can categorize all of modern cinema.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

77 (edited by Kyle 2010-04-20 17:49:10)

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

You're mistaking my point.

I don't mean that these things (Kirk getting the Enterprise, Luke getting the X-Wing) shouldn't happen. I mean that they should be better JUSTIFIED.

The way in which they happen should make more sense. The cause and effect of the human interactions should make more sense. Sometimes doing that is a line of dialogue, a small scene, and sometimes it's scrapping the entire sequence of events and starting over.

Star Wars needed one of the first two (and actually has something like it in the deleted scenes). Trek09 needed the third.

79 (edited by Trey 2010-04-20 17:52:01)

Re: Star Trek

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Re: Star Trek

Touché.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

83 (edited by Gregory Harbin 2010-04-20 17:57:34)

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

86 (edited by Brian 2010-04-20 18:08:47)

Re: Star Trek

Kyle, I've pointed out specifically the sequences of events that don't add up. So has Jeffrey. And I've fully admitted that none of them grabbed me sufficiently to make me come out of the movie going, "That was awful!" I LIKED it when I first walked out of the theater.

But you're correct, the Eagles ARE a HUGE deus ex machina. Do I still enjoy those movies? Sure. But it's still a bad way to end. On Tolkien's part as well as Jackson, though I could be mistaken, but doesn't Tolkien justify it in some way? Like the Eagles had fled Middle Earth because of the growing evil or something like that? I don't remember.

And you can nitpick the plots of almost any narrative. Because almost all narratives aren't perfect. Because narrative is really hard to do. Doesn't mean I'm going to give anybody a pass (which includes myself by the way).

But it's a movie commentary podcast, so I'm going to call out failings in movies where I see them.

EDIT: Oh, I'm actually leaving the computer for awhile, to have dinner, watch Lost, and interact with humans in person. So you'll have full reign to bash me for being a nerd for several hours. Enjoy.

Re: Star Trek

No, the eagles were stupid. Stupid with or without justification.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Agreed. Much better to have them start walking down the mountain, cut to them at the bottom with Aragorn et al. waiting for them. No more screen time taken up and much less of a contrivance.

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

90 (edited by Kyle 2010-04-20 18:22:05)

Re: Star Trek

Don't get defensive on me, sir.  I would never bash you for being a nerd- Teague and I were best friends in high school, and that was BEFORE Teague lost weight, died his hair, and started getting laid.  In fact, the only girl Fig could get in his nerdiest era is the girl I'm proooobably going to wind up marrying.  C'mon.  I'm not bashing you for being a nerd.

My point is that I SEE all your nitpicks but I don't see why you say this movie makes no sense when using the same microscope you're looking at this one, I can't think of ANY movies that make sense.  I understand you want a perfect Star Wars movie- I fucking love Superman and half of DIF thinks Superman is a dumb character and a dumb story because of the sub-par movies that have been made about him.  You give me some money and I'll make a Superman movie that will make any human being with a soul cry.  But if someone makes a Superman movie that is as true to the spirit of Superman as JJ's Trek is true to the spirit of Trek, with as much passion and emotion as JJ's Trek has, I would dance naked in the streets out of happiness. 

I guess my point is that yes- dumb things happen in Trek 09, but it captures Kirk and Spock and Bones, looks incredible, and your main nitpicks about the mechanations of the narrative could be equally applied to nearly every version of Star Trek that has ever existed.

I should point out that on no level am I feeling any hostility for anyone here that disagrees.  I take it we're all seasoned forumers here and I know that sometimes shit gets heated for no reason because tone is hard to read through the internet.  I don't intend to get into a Dark City fight with any of you, because at the end of the day I've listened to more hours of you guys sharing your opinions than I've listened to MUSIC in the last year, so there's no lack of respect intended here.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

92 (edited by Trey 2010-04-20 18:44:10)

Re: Star Trek

Re: Star Trek

I love this forum.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

*breathes in-* Yea I was going to say a few things about this commentary....then I figured nah me and Jeffery Harrel already talked about Star Wars and Star Trek

big_smile

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

ZangrethorDigital.ca

96 (edited by BigDamnArtist 2010-04-20 20:00:50)

Re: Star Trek

On another note, just because I like a little chaos, I want to throw this out there.

What in THIS MOVIE gives any indication that Starfleet hierarchical system is in anyway at all similar to any system we know or recognize?? Yes i know that whatever, you have your own ideas of what a military system looks like, but fuck that. What in THIS MOVIE gives you any indication that this is abnormal or out of the ordinary?? Cause no one else seems to mind.

Discuss.

And on a separate more closely related to what I actually think, note.

I forget who said it, and I'm too tired to go check. But someone said something about them being on there own, god only knows where without back up or support and how that changes the situation. I agree. So thats all now think back, Pike KNOWS WHO KIRK IS, when he meets him in the bar (After the bar tender tells him, but still, he's got a repuatation). Thats big dudes. Pike seems to have a certain connection with Kirk that transcends Teacher/Cadet. And don't you think that would carry through the Academy? I'm sure Pike kept a very close eye on Kirk throughout his schooling, and saw something he liked (Kobiyashi Murru anyone? I know I spelt that wrong, shut the fuck up). So when he's in a sticky situation, he wants someone who can get the job done, enter Kirk. Bam, Pike promotes him and the story continues. So in the end Kirk is not the only one breaking a few rules.
I think this makes alot of sense, but unforunatly it isn't really portrayed this way in the movie. How would we fix this? fairly simply really, all it would take would be a few short scenes of Kirk at the Academy impressing Pike and them establishing this sort of a relationship so that when we get to the end it makes sense why Pike would promote him over someone else on the ship.

And all of a sudden, all we have is McCoy breaking a few rules to get Kirk on board (If you notice, Kirk was just going to stay behind as far as we know, it's Mccoy that sneaks him on board, Kirk just goes along with it.), it's Pike that breaks the rules to promote him over someone else, and then Kirk just assumes the position he's required to when Spock steps down. Fairly reasonable I would think, as far as his accension to power goes.

Alright I am ready for the massive hail of hate that's sure to arise...bring it on.

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Star Trek

Re: Star Trek

oh my god its a different timeline the butterfly effect or whatever jesus

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Star Trek

Thumbs up Thumbs down

100

Re: Star Trek

I'm pointing out the fact that there's a difference between actual nitpicks that bug me as a fan just because they're different (where the ship gets built) and the legitimate issues I have with the story.

And again trying to point out that most of this time I haven't been harping on the nitpicks. But that point is still apparently lost on everyone.