Re: Attack of the Clones

redxavier wrote:

I get the impression this was due in part to Hayden Christensen? Apologies if it's not, just that over the years I've interacted with quite a few female fans of Star Wars who seem to like the prequels almost solely because of him at first, going positively gaga over him. Seems teenage girls respond to the angst-ridden, bad boy character as well as the pretty face.

No apologies necessary, but PSHAW, NO. Ewan McGregor is the cutie in that one. Hiiiiisss beeaaaard.

In all honesty, no, is was not Hayden so much as Padme. (Though, I can see how some girls would be smitten with him.) I don't know if it's politically correct or whatever but I really responded to the "I'm a powerful lady and I've got important war-stopping things on my mind, but I'm in love with this guy and he's kind of an idiot, but I really like him and don't know what to do about it" bit.

For the way I watch love stories the attributes of the guy aren't actually that important. As long as he's decent enough (Anakin is admittedly borderline, here) to believe that she would fall for him, then he's good enough and the story can work. It's more about how the woman deals with being in love with the guy. Does she reject him/pursue him/wait for him. What does she give up for him? What risks does she take by accepting him? That's the more interesting and romantic thing. And Attack of the Clones has a lot to offer on that front.

Aside from the romance, though, I just really like the atmosphere of the movie. Visually, I find it stunning with the waterfalls, the rain with the ocean clone aliens, Obi-Wan dodging laser beams in the asteroid field, and Padme's outfits are some of the most majestic of all the Star Wars costumes. Across the Stars is beautiful.  And Obi-Wan gets to run around playing detective with R4! Sigh. I love it.

Re: Attack of the Clones

So, I just finished up the ROTS commentary and Ryan said some things regarding TPM that I feel the same way about ATOC and I think it helps clarify at least my feelings.

First of all, I get that people hate these movies and it is fun to mock them, rip them to shreds and basically eviscerate them
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc9ghjS7kP1qaed4ho2_500.gif

I have a lot of fun hearing the cries of the fan boys as well as the potential that was wasted in these films. Simply put, it was a lot of possibility and it was lost. I get that, I really do. But, like Ryan said about TPM, I can kind of divorce AOTC from the PT and the PT from the OT. Its like the Old Republic video games. Those are really cool and amazing and take place in the same galaxy far far away, but its kind of separate from the movies.

Same thing here, for me. AOTC really is kind of an odd duck to me, in that, as the middle act, it is setting up for ROTS and the Clone Wars. But, it does so in a fun way, that really is why I enjoy it. I don't need TPM or ROTS in order to enjoy AOTC. It has an interesting story, with a good hook at the beginning. Like Bathilda said, Obi-Wan has the detective plot, and a very much a building up on it self, where it's an assassination, no it's a secret army, no it's war.

It has some of my favorite Star Wars scenes in it. The final battle between the Clone Army and the Droid Army, Obi-Wan and Jango fight and chase scene and the Arena are all fun and interesting moments. Sam Jackson has his one moment of almost being Sam Jackson.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/9861148b5529a55a43964dfd89e3a706/tumblr_mfdeikTOHc1qb9yw1o1_500.gif
http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Mace-Windu-This-Partys-Over-Samuel-L-Jackson.gif

In addition, I get a sense of what George was trying to do because he doesn't regard the OT as "completed or finished." I get the sense that he was always frustrated by lack of resources, lack of time, lack of what-have-you. When I first watched the Behind the Scenes of the Special Editions, he talked about that and how he always (maybe) wanted to go back and do to it what he envisioned.
I think one of the commentators noted that George isn't happy with the Empire, the one fans loved, and really wants to show the audience his vision. We know that it was the fact that there were so many limitations that made the OT the success that it was and is now.

The PT is that experiment to do what he always wanted to do. Unfortunately, it loses itself in those details. It becomes a pale imitation of George's past success. It lacks the limits of the OT and loses its punch. Again, missed opportunities and I get that. But, I see what George is trying to do and while I think he was wrong to try the PT, I don't begrude him for wanting to try. (Heck, if I could go back and remake my first fan film, I would in a heart beat).

No, this isn't a perfect movie or even a good movie. It is a fun movie, it feels closer to Star Wars than TPM or ROTS ever did (to me) and its one that I can watch and have fun with, then mock later.

Speaking of mocking, let it begin...
http://i.imgur.com/71XrEmb.gif

Last edited by fireproof78 (2013-06-23 23:43:37)

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

You know, it might be worth mentioning that I was late to the theater the first time I saw AOTC and this could be part of why I like it so much. Next time you watch the movie consider starting at the shot of the assassin bug crawling in the window. Starting with the chase scene helps with the pacing, you lose the initial murder attempt and awkward reunion scene and bonus: very little Jar-Jar left over.

Re: Attack of the Clones

Bathilda wrote:

redxavier wrote:

I get the impression this was due in part to Hayden Christensen? Apologies if it's not, just that over the years I've interacted with quite a few female fans of Star Wars who seem to like the prequels almost solely because of him at first, going positively gaga over him. Seems teenage girls respond to the angst-ridden, bad boy character as well as the pretty face.

No apologies necessary, but PSHAW, NO. Ewan McGregor is the cutie in that one. Hiiiiisss beeaaaard.

There's no eye-candy in this one for me. Ewan McGregor has nice eyes, but that beard really is awful. I clearly remember disliking Hayden Christensen's performance in Life as a House, so when I heard he was playing Anakin, I gave up at that point. I know he got all sorts of awards for his role in that movie, but I thought he was pretty unbearable. As mentioned in the commentary, he gets tasked to play the same kid over and over again in every movie, and I really hate that kid.

Bathilda wrote:

In all honesty, no, is was not Hayden so much as Padme. (Though, I can see how some girls would be smitten with him.) I don't know if it's politically correct or whatever but I really responded to the "I'm a powerful lady and I've got important war-stopping things on my mind, but I'm in love with this guy and he's kind of an idiot, but I really like him and don't know what to do about it" bit.

For the way I watch love stories the attributes of the guy aren't actually that important. As long as he's decent enough (Anakin is admittedly borderline, here) to believe that she would fall for him, then he's good enough and the story can work. It's more about how the woman deals with being in love with the guy. Does she reject him/pursue him/wait for him. What does she give up for him? What risks does she take by accepting him? That's the more interesting and romantic thing. And Attack of the Clones has a lot to offer on that front.

I'd be with you on this if there was ever a point where we get a clear sense of what's at stake for Padme or where Padme acknowledges Anakin's failings and accepts them. But we never get those scenes because  Anakin's failings as a character are unintentional; they're the result of a poor script and bad acting. I imagine in Lucas's head, Anakin is a much better character than the one we actually got. Also, at this point in her career, Natalie Portman still needed the backing of a strong director in order to make good on-screen choices. Lucas has never been that director, so Padme's motivations are unclear.

In The Phantom Menace, Padme's role was much clearer, and Portman did a good job with it. But in AotC, as Lucas introduces his half-baked notions of the romance, Portman has to kind of muddle her way through. The reasons why her character falls for Anakin and why she feels that they cannot be together just aren't there, so there's no consistency. It's almost as if Portman is playing a different character in every scene.

Portman's not really at fault here, 'cause I can't think of another actress of the appropriate age who could've done a better job under the circumstances. However, I can't invest in the romance based solely on what Padme brings to the story.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

http://25.media.tumblr.com/9861148b5529a55a43964dfd89e3a706/tumblr_mfdeikTOHc1qb9yw1o1_500.gif

roll

I'm likely to raise my ire if I go any further, and I'm really trying to avoid working myself up these days. Suffice it to say, I consider AOTC to be 'Transformers bad'. Almost everything in it rubs me the wrong way, more so for the 'detective' subplot than the ultimately harmless love story part.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

redxavier wrote:

roll

I'm likely to raise my ire if I go any further, and I'm really trying to avoid working myself up these days. Suffice it to say, I consider AOTC to be 'Transformers bad'. Almost everything in it rubs me the wrong way, more so for the 'detective' subplot than the ultimately harmless love story part.

Well, like I said, I never thought it was a good movie. I'm with Trey when he says that it isn't the worst of the prequels. It's just a fun movie for me

But, I'll not argue with you about it, for sake of your blood pressure wink

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Just seen this and thought it was really quite an interesting take. You may remember the fella also did one for Episode 1.

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

http://i.imgur.com/j01UTUt.gif

Anakin Skywalker did nothing wrong.

The Tusken Raiders are savage subhumans. Give me one good reason why they shouldn't be wiped out. There isn't a single redeeming quality about them. The only action any of them has ever expressed is "relentlessly try to murder anyone who isn't one of them".

They're constantly attacking people, even when those people are minding their own business. Their coming of age tradition involves capturing a living being and torturing it to death. Anakin's mother lived in the same desert ranch for years until one day when they showed up and gangraped her to death. They also randomly shoot at podracers. Imagine if every NASCAR race some Taliban member showed up and started taking potshots at Tony Stewart. We would be rightfully outraged and demand their eradication.

They live in easily identifiable campsites and within small enough tribes that a a small group of people with blasters could wipe out a whole village with relative ease. Why aren't they all dead? No one one would be sad if they all died. Anakin took the initiative when no one else would. Sure, it wasn't for the best reason, but his actions were completely justified in his actions.

The only thing Anakin did incorrectly was comparing them to animals. Animals are useful; they can be tamed or harvested. Tusken Raiders are more like a virus. As in everyone else's lives will be measurably improved once a concerted effort is actually made to get rid of them.

Re: Attack of the Clones

Ok, Dr. Mengele.

Eddie Doty

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Now, now. He's just saying we have to wipe out those damned natives who keep trying to drive us out of their homeland. Nothing wrong with that.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

You might as well have dropped an 1840s op-ed about the Comanche in there and it would read exactly the same.

http://www.economist.com/node/16374526

Or an interview with one of the people with beer and popcorn on that ridge watching bombs hit Gaza.

If you're trying to be funny, I'm... sorry you think that's funny?

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Well, continuing this discussion (because, why not?) are his actions more justified or less justified because he is a Jedi? For example, in the movie "Con Air" Nic Cage's character pleads guilty, only to have the judge hold him to a higher standard because of his military training and he still gets jail time. So, I can understand the conceit if the moisture farmers were to band together and attempt to push the Tuskens back, or if the Jawas attempted to purchase mercenaries to defend themselves.

But, a Jedi is more powerful and far more capable than even the local Tatooine governments. Should a different standard be applied?

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Ask yourselves, why is it okay to exterminate Xenomorphs but wrong if it's a tribe of Tusken Raiders? They're both inherently hostile lifeforms incapable of a peaceful coexistence with any other sentient being. You cheer when Ripley eradicates LV-426 of the Xenomorph infestation but shed a tear when Anakin Skywalker kills a tribe of Tusken Raiders who gangraped his mother to death. Is there any one of us who wouldn't have acted the same way as Anakin in that situation?

The comparisons to the Jewish people and Native Americans are asinine. We're not talking about a different race of homo sapien that is ultimately the same as us on a genetic level, we're talking about an entirely different species that rapes, pillages and kills everything it can. Again, their coming of age ritual involves capturing and torturing another living being to death. Why is this behavior excused? Tatooine being their homeland is hardly an understandable reason for their aggressive actions towards humans. You don't see Jawas committing such heinous acts. In fact, Jawas are a valued member of the Tatooine society and economy even if stereotypes and prejudices exist against them. They've at least made an attempt to join a diverse society made up of species from all around the galaxy; a society the Tusken Raiders continually attack at every opportunity. Further more, Tatooine isn't a piece of land that is being "stolen", it's an entire planet, with plenty of room for everyone, yet the Tusken Raiders refuse to share it with anyone who isn't them. The apologist culture has to stop if the people of Tatooine are to ever live in peace. Dismissing and excusing the destructive, isolationist, xenophobic, and criminal behavior they've displayed over and over again, without any evidence on the contrary, is akin to defending and accepting Palpatine's war crimes because they are a part of his "Sith Culture".

Re: Attack of the Clones

Ewing wrote:

Ask yourselves, why is it okay to exterminate Xenomorphs but wrong if it's a tribe of Tusken Raiders?

So many ways to answer this, but the idea that you're just trolling is too great. Not worth it.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

This is just life in Obama's Galaxy, Ewing.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Invid wrote:
Ewing wrote:

Ask yourselves, why is it okay to exterminate Xenomorphs but wrong if it's a tribe of Tusken Raiders?

So many ways to answer this, but the idea that you're just trolling is too great. Not worth it.

Typical elitist New Republic response. You people have gotten to the point where it's only a matter of time until you stand up for the Borg's right to exist too.

Doctor Submarine wrote:

This is just life in Obama's Galaxy, Ewing.

I'm not saying things were better under the Empire but at least they knew how to handle obvious threats to their prosperity.

Re: Attack of the Clones

fine whatever they're smallpox kill them all i still don't like star wars very much what am i doing in this thread

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

THE ANSWER TO 28 ABY IS 0 BBY!

Re: Attack of the Clones

Ewing wrote:
Invid wrote:
Ewing wrote:

Ask yourselves, why is it okay to exterminate Xenomorphs but wrong if it's a tribe of Tusken Raiders?

So many ways to answer this, but the idea that you're just trolling is too great. Not worth it.

Typical elitist New Republic response. You people have gotten to the point where it's only a matter of time until you stand up for the Borg's right to exist too.

Well, is that not the principle behind Species 8472 is to establish a force that actually is harmful to the Borg and makes us more sympathetic?

Personally, I'm going with a bias here of those who present the material. Because, in one view, we see the Borg who assimilate entire cultures in the name of perfection, or their view of it, and that is shown as villainous behavior. I'm really not inclined to argue against that point of view.

However, we are later presented with Species 8472, a force bent on destroying all life not like them. Despite the fact that the Borg are the aggressors, the point of view is one of sympathy as the Borg are facing annihilation. However, given previous encounters with the Borg, should we really be sympathetic?

Ewing wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:

This is just life in Obama's Galaxy, Ewing.

I'm not saying things were better under the Empire but at least they knew how to handle obvious threats to their prosperity.

Is Tatooine a part of the New Republic? Is was only a part of the Empire in name only, really.

Also, my question still remains, we are not Anakin and Anakin is not the average, everyday, person. He is a Jedi. Should a different standard be applied?

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Oh hey, what's going on...in...here...

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1a407iMDo1qglzzo.gif

I'm just...gonna leave now...

ZangrethorDigital.ca

Re: Attack of the Clones

http://jerkassclothing.com/images/2.0/popular/star-wars-keep-calm-and-move-along.jpg

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

fireproof78 wrote:

Well, is that not the principle behind Species 8472 is to establish a force that actually is harmful to the Borg and makes us more sympathetic?

Personally, I'm going with a bias here of those who present the material. Because, in one view, we see the Borg who assimilate entire cultures in the name of perfection, or their view of it, and that is shown as villainous behavior. I'm really not inclined to argue against that point of view.

However, we are later presented with Species 8472, a force bent on destroying all life not like them. Despite the fact that the Borg are the aggressors, the point of view is one of sympathy as the Borg are facing annihilation. However, given previous encounters with the Borg, should we really be sympathetic?

Is Tatooine a part of the New Republic? Is was only a part of the Empire in name only, really.

Also, my question still remains, we are not Anakin and Anakin is not the average, everyday, person. He is a Jedi. Should a different standard be applied?

I don't pay attention to the psychotic adventures and ramblings that come from the Voyager mission. Remember that time they said traveling faster than light would turn you into a salamander? You might as well reference stories from The Onion.

Tatooine is a part of the New Republic in the sense that the New Republic is now the dominant regime in the galaxy.

No, a different standard shouldn't be applied when it comes to dealing with rapists who literally fuck people to death. Treating them with mercy would be vastly more immoral than swiftly ending their parasitic existence.

Last edited by Ewing (2014-07-18 06:11:27)

Re: Attack of the Clones

There's no evidence that 1) Shmi is raped to death or that 2) their rite of passage is to kidnap, rape and kill somesone....

Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

Ewing wrote:
fireproof78 wrote:

Well, is that not the principle behind Species 8472 is to establish a force that actually is harmful to the Borg and makes us more sympathetic?

Personally, I'm going with a bias here of those who present the material. Because, in one view, we see the Borg who assimilate entire cultures in the name of perfection, or their view of it, and that is shown as villainous behavior. I'm really not inclined to argue against that point of view.

However, we are later presented with Species 8472, a force bent on destroying all life not like them. Despite the fact that the Borg are the aggressors, the point of view is one of sympathy as the Borg are facing annihilation. However, given previous encounters with the Borg, should we really be sympathetic?

Is Tatooine a part of the New Republic? Is was only a part of the Empire in name only, really.

Also, my question still remains, we are not Anakin and Anakin is not the average, everyday, person. He is a Jedi. Should a different standard be applied?

I don't pay attention to the psychotic adventures and ramblings that come from the Voyager mission. Remember that time they said traveling faster than light would turn you into a salamander? You might as well reference stories from The Onion.

Tatooine is a part of the New Republic in the sense that the New Republic is now the dominant regime in the galaxy.

No, a different standard shouldn't be applied when it comes to dealing with rapists who literally fuck people to death. Treating them with mercy would be vastly more immoral than swiftly ending their parasitic existence.

So, Jedi do not attack, unless dealing with rapists. Interesting standard.

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Attack of the Clones

fireproof78 wrote:

So, Jedi do not attack, unless dealing with rapists. Interesting standard.

Which makes Ben's fight in the Cantina all the more interesting.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down