BBQ wrote: ShowFirst, the fact that Walt has hair in the flash-forwards does NOT indicate that his cancer is back in remission -- it only indicates that he's no longer undergoing chemotherapy. That could mean that the cancer is in remission, but it also could mean that he volunteered or was forced to stop undergoing chemo.
Ah hah, good catch.
Totally—my mental shorthand of cancer = bald was too presumptuous. It's the chemo, not the cancer itself that = bald. I believe you may have keyed into a key detail here: The cancer might be here to stay (I think Vince Gilligan has dropped a hint to that effect), and if that's the case it's a good bet that Walt will simply be forced to stop treatments when he goes on the lam. Shit those flash forwards fascinate me. It's pretty clever how they're using that device to show us Walt's future but not his ultimate fate, almost the way he might have a vision of his future without fully knowing how it will play out.
BBQ wrote:
spoiler
Showit's actually kinda bad that it took you this long to start hating and rooting against Walter. He's only a sympathetic figure through about half of the first season. There are several points later in the first season where he's clearly transitioned into cooking meth as an ego-trip instead of actually taking care of his family -- he's warping the concept of taking care of one's family into an excuse to become the monster he clearly wants to become. He gets progressively worse every season, shedding any pretention that he cares about anyone other than himself (he only cares about his family because "it's what a man does" -- thus again making it about himself).
So really, you (and everyone else) should have been rooting against Walter for several seasons now. 
If the point is that it is itself alarming and sort of fucked-up that I've taken this long to hate Walt, then we agree. I've engaged in pro-Walt apologetics for far too long, no doubt (at the time, I even rationalized Walt's actions w/r/t the whole Jane Margolis thing; I was shameless). So, yeah, I plead guilty to being in love with the character from day one, hating the sins but loving the sinner. I have no excuse.
But I do think the kid-on-the-bike thing, which made me move from disapproving of Walt to hating him, marked a new low point for Walt: the utter lack of any human response, and moreover, the inability to relate to someone (Jesse) who was actually having a real human response to what happened. The Walt of even just a couple seasons ago would have been more affected by it, but the post-Fring Walt doesn't lose a wink of sleep over it. Of course, this viewer experience—one of constantly performing the moral calculus it takes to figure out just how much you want to root for a protagonist whose actions you find increasingly reprehensible, and even what that might mean about you—is something Gilligan and the show's writers have always seemed to be going for. They've done the whole anti-hero thing really well.
After the premiere, I said "That's it. I'm officially rooting for Hank. He's now my protagonist in this story." But after this latest episode, and his icky, self-serving diner discussion with Skyler, I'm not so sure anymore. He and his wife are both starting to lose their shit, I think. Okay, so Pinkman. I'll root for Pinkman. How can you not love a dude who drives around the neighborhood tossing cash out of his car?