Re: Superman (1978)

Prophecies, Chosen one, characters coming back to life for no reason, fucking with canon for no good reason,
a villain with a secret identity that is revealed half-way through and makes no sense, sounds like a J.J script alright

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Actually, having just finished it, the draft I posted is very different from the one Moriarty reviewed, the main difference being that there is no Luthor reveal.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Oh my god that sounds atrocious. Superman's dad tells him, "You can't die because you're the chosen one!" and Superman is like, "K" and just DECIDES TO COME BACK TO LIFE?!?!?

Eww.  I hated that trick when Harry Potter did it, too.

EDIT:  And when Neo did it, and Jesus, etc.   But that's the trope, we just loves to keep using it.

Re: Superman (1978)

Yeah, the one Doc Sub read is the one I read.  There's no gay Jimmy stuff, Luthor stuff is much better integrated, the whole Kryptonian plot is pretty well done.  It really reads a hell of a lot better than Moriarty's review makes it sound.

I totally enjoyed it.  Sure, Krypton doesn't explode.  Whatever.  Jor-El is still alive, and there's some strange and nebulous religious bullcrap all over the thing (and I say this as a pretty intense believer in Christianity), but there are some amazing elements.  JJ's Lois Lane is a great character in her own right, as firey and passionate a crusading reporter as you could like, able to take care of her own business without needing a rescue all the time.  The scene where she meets Clark outside a frat party that both of them are dragged to is amazing - it makes her the inspiration for his own journalistic career, and really shows how someone like Clark Kent/Superman could truly fall in love with someone like Lois Lane.  Man of Steel took good steps in that direction, but I actually like JJ's version a little more.

And, call me a heretic if you like, I love that Superman's main adversary in all of this was his own upbringing (at least until the Kryptonians show up).  While the Kents loved him and tried to raise him with that love, they also taught him a great deal of self-control, which when others taught him that what he could do was wrong, became repression and a crippling insecurity.  That was pretty similar to Man of Steel, actually.

A lot of the beats of the Air Force One rescue mirror the scene in Superman Returns where Clark rescues the plane, and that plays really really well.

Anyway, sorry for topic derail.

I make music and teach at-risk students.
soundcloud.com/the-one-galen

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Trey wrote:
Doctor Submarine wrote:

Oh my god that sounds atrocious. Superman's dad tells him, "You can't die because you're the chosen one!" and Superman is like, "K" and just DECIDES TO COME BACK TO LIFE?!?!?

Eww.  I hated that trick when Harry Potter did it, too.

I thought the same thing. Harry Potter at least makes it clear what's happened to him in that moment. How does Jor-El even visit Supes in that moment? Are they in heaven? But I thought Jor-El was alive? Also, if the script says that Superman's skin was literally boiling and practically melting, no way he just gets back up after a supernatural pep talk from Dad. At least Deathly Hallows has it so that Harry doesn't actually die, just get knocked into limbo. Superman is killed by kryptonite, and he decides, "nope, fuck that" and comes back.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Harry Potter has a sense of humour about itself when it does it, and then explains it pretty plausibly with the wand stuff afterwards.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Yeah, that part was stupid and entirely unnecessary.

I make music and teach at-risk students.
soundcloud.com/the-one-galen

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Love mashups like these.

The audio from the Man of Steel trailer edited it to the Christopher Reeve Superman films.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/993783_664602260223985_1448682685_n.jpg

---------------------------------------------
I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation.

Re: Superman (1978)

Something occurred to me on listening to you guys call out the various long takes. In the directors commentary for the musical 1776, the director says he was constantly fighting with the studio over cuts to the film. To combat this, he filmed as much as possible in long takes. This made cuts harder, although they still managed to remove one whole song and the opening against his will. Given the fight Donner was having, I wonder if he was trying to do the same thing.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

35

Re: Superman (1978)

Invid wrote:

Something occurred to me on listening to you guys call out the various long takes. In the directors commentary for the musical 1776, the director says he was constantly fighting with the studio over cuts to the film. To combat this, he filmed as much as possible in long takes. This made cuts harder, although they still managed to remove one whole song and the opening against his will. Given the fight Donner was having, I wonder if he was trying to do the same thing.

Yeah, that may well be. Cutting-in-the-camera and doing other things to arrange it so it's harder to butcher your film is definitely a neat trick. John Ford, Hitchcock, Bogdanovich all did it at some point. (Peter Bogdanovich tells a cool story—he's full of cool stories—about how he resorted to cutting-in-the-camera to make it harder for the suits to fuck with Last Picture Show.)

I actually don't know if that's what Donner was up to or not, but I wouldn't be surprised. During the commentary, I think it was Trey who made the point that a lot of the coverage during the newsroom scenes seemed influenced by All the President's Men. So the long takes might not be monocausal, but yeah, they may have served as a creative "insurance policy" for Donner. Whatever it was, the long takes are quite well done and come off naturally. I love the one in Lois' apartment, when Superman flies off the balcony and we move, without a cut, to see a suit-and-tie-clad Clark enter through the front door. That one really makes the long take serve the storytelling—very cool.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Finally got the time to listen this commentary (still need to finish it but hey). I got a good chuckle out of the first 20 minutes, especially the ideas of Superman landing in other countries, and Dr. Manhattan being the Libertarian Superman big_smile

So, I present, "Know your Superman"

Red Son:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/bc/Superman_in_Red_Son.png/250px-Superman_in_Red_Son.png


Herr Superman

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100621175440/marvel_dc/images/9/9d/Herr_Superman_Earth-8.jpg

Ubermensch

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080117144820/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/b/bb/Ubermensch.jpg/500px-Ubermensch.jpg

Overman
http://www.funnybookbabylon.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/overman52-small1.jpg
http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080907172325/marvel_dc/images/5/50/Overman_%28Earth-10%29_001.png


Incarnations of Superman tearing the parallel universes apart:
http://www.funnybookbabylon.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/splittin-superman-small1.jpg

God loves you!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Libertarian Superman just wants to smoke pot and not get busted, stop judging guys.

I think Lois' spelling problems is just mean as a character quirk. I think it even continued and was a joke on Smallville.

You can be smart and spell for shit (ahem).

Yeah, you know if a Superman came to Earth, religious peole would freak the fuck out, right? (Sorry, your god is fake; THIS IS REAL BITCHES!)

Last edited by Mr. Pointy (2013-08-09 12:01:22)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

I think this is brought up near the end of Alan Moore's Marvel/Miricleman stories (they were forced to change the name for the US release). Marvelwoman comments that there's this group that worships her, which she's fine with so long as they don't bother her as she finds it amusing.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

I listened to this ep the other day. Lots of fun. My feelings are pretty much the same. There's so much to like about this movie, and then the ending just goes to hell. Not only is the time travel stuff stupid, there's no conflict. Lex Luthor has no reason at all to contact Superman in the first place. It's crazy. The writers just have these two completely separate stories going at the same time and then mash them together for no reason in the third act because, hey, something's got to come to a climax.

Warning: I'm probably rewriting this post as you read it.

Zarban's House of Commentaries

Re: Superman (1978)

I just want to say one thing. I thought the ending was pretty clear.
He goes back in time, then makes sure to catch both missiles, now that he
has some more time. We just don't see them getting caught, I guess
they thought it would be redundant?  I remember watching it as a little
kid, back then I thought that he actually made the planet move which caused
the time travel, but still got that he caught both missiles. Just seemed obvious
to me?

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Superman (1978)

Paulou brought it up in another thread - why are all your posts indented like they are? You know you can keep typing off past the right-margin of the post form and it'll just automatically go to the next line, right? You don't have to manually carriage-return your paragraphs.

In case it's not clear what I'm talking about, look at my words right here. See how both of the paragraphs in this post — and all the other posts in the thread — are "wider" than yours on the page? That.

Teague Chrystie

I have a tendency to fix your typos.

Thumbs up Thumbs down