Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

So anyway, I liked the episode. Sad not to see LSH -- but the thing about this adaptation, versus something like Harry Potter, is they're mix-and-matching events. When HP cut something out of, say, Goblet of Fire, that thing just no longer existed in the HP film continuity. They weren't going to find a way to fit it in later -- which hosed them a couple of times. But things not appearing in this season don't necessarily mean they'll never appear -- except in cases where the story has already passed them over. That is the case with Coldhands, but not Stoneheart.

It's interesting as the show goes on to discover the things that GRRM apparently admitted to the showrunners he wasn't really going anywhere with.

Loved the Harryhausen fight. Amazing it only takes ten years to go from needing ILM and $100M in Pirates of the Caribbean to being able to turn around something pretty close in quality on an HBO budget and schedule. It shouldn't amaze me -- VFX innovation actually does reliably follow a trickle-down model -- but it always does.

Interesting that they altered Tyrion's murdering Shae to have her go for a knife. As I recall in the book it was much more cold-blooded; she tried to put her spell back on him and he choked her slowly and deliberately. I missed the "hands of gold are always cold" setup/callback but I will NOT miss "Where do whores go?"

It's weird that the season almost felt like it was trying to wrap things up on a hopeful note, like they didn't know if they'd get another, when they've already been renewed for another two.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

277

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

I did miss Tywin being such an piece of shit and saying "wherever whores go".

278

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

I dug it. I think Lady Stoneheart woulda been cool, but I see the point that it would make the finale a bit too busy (and I wasn't expecting this episode to end on Arya, but that worked so well. especially with the big soaring music cue!).

I do wonder where exactly they'll put Lady Stoneheart next season though. It's a shame this show doesn't do cold opens 'cause that would make a great "what the actual fuck?!?" one for the premiere.

edit: also, what Dorkman said about the skeleton fight. i love the fact that the CGI wasn't overly fluid. i mean, it was smooth, but it also had an impressive heft/momentum to it. totally had the Harryhausen spirit going for it. big love for that.

Last edited by Herc (2014-06-16 06:26:09)

Disclaimer: if you dislike the tone of a post I make, re-read it in a North/East London accent until it sounds sufficiently playful smile

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Herc wrote:

I do wonder where exactly they'll put Lady Stoneheart next season though. It's a shame this show doesn't do cold opens 'cause that would make a great "what the actual fuck?!?" one for the premiere.

It would make a fine closer for the premiere too, or any episode at all quite honestly.

Oh, and the line about Tywin not shitting gold -- I can see them finding a way to work that in later, when Tyrion talks about what he's done. And I hope they do, because it's a good line.

EDIT: the full-on magic missile business didn't bother me watching it, but discussing it with Trey and Eddie on Twitter just now has changed my feelings and made me a bit disappointed -- not that the show went there, but that it didn't lay the groundwork. By this point in the books we'd heard the legends about the Children of the Forest almost as often as we'd heard references to the Others, so when Bran finally met one of the Children it had a whole "legends come to life" thing to it. But I don't remember if they've ever mentioned them at all in the show -- maybe in season one with Old Nan? -- so instead in the TV universe there's just a sense of "Well I guess this is a thing now, too; dragons and wood nymphs and fuck it, no rules."

Last edited by Dorkman (2014-06-16 06:37:43)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

280

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Huh, that never occurred to me. I just assumed it was a wildfire kinda projectile. And watching it back just now in slowmo, she's throwing physical explosive projectiles, not conjuring magic.

Though that leaves open the whole 'it ignites before it hits anything' thing, but I'm sure that can be rationalized away somehow.
Or maybe it is full-on magic. We'll see.

Last edited by Herc (2014-06-16 06:47:14)

Disclaimer: if you dislike the tone of a post I make, re-read it in a North/East London accent until it sounds sufficiently playful smile

281

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Dorkman wrote:

It's weird that the season almost felt like it was trying to wrap things up on a hopeful note, like they didn't know if they'd get another, when they've already been renewed for another two.

Well, for GoT to NOT get renewed at this point would have been pretty shocking, it was pretty much a given even before the actual announcement.   GoT could kill a hundred horses and stay on the air now. smile

I think the entire season being a mostly downward spiral for the "good guys" pretty much required an "up" ending.  The last couple of episodes had a lot of people complaining fuck this show, the most terrible thing is what always happens, etc.   Knowing they'd get a lot of that, seems like a smart move to build toward an upturn for a change.

Herc wrote:

It's a shame this show doesn't do cold opens 'cause that would make a great "what the actual fuck?!?" one for the premiere.

Actually, they have. But only once, I think.  The first episode of this season began with Tywin ordering the smith to reforge Ice into two swords, and then came the titles.   Again, I really appreciate the way they built the entire season to make Tywin seem so unstoppable that tonight's sudden implosion of the Lannister dynasty came as a complete surprise to all the non-book-folk.

282

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Trey wrote:

GoT could kill a hundred horses and stay on the air now. smile

Hah! By this point, the appeal is probably being measured in stables.

And yeah, I know that the 'judging public appeal by internet' thing is kinda dodgy, but with GoT, they pretty much know that even though a lot of people torrent/stream the show, they're also really likely to buy dvd/blurrys, and since HBO is gonna see the majority (if not all?) of those proceeds, there is absolutely NO fear of cancellation.

Frankly, when they announce show renewals, HBO's press release for Game of Thrones should probably just be "What the hell do you think? Have you seen your twitter/facebook feed on a sunday night? That's what we thought. Boom!".

Disclaimer: if you dislike the tone of a post I make, re-read it in a North/East London accent until it sounds sufficiently playful smile

283

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

HBO basically owns their shows outright - unlike regular networks which have to renegotiate license deals with show producers every season.   So yeah, all that DVD and ancillary money pretty much goes straight into their bank account.

Besides, even with all the piracy and HBOGo abuse, GoT is still their highest-rated show ever.  Nielsen says 5 million viewers, which means actual in-front-of-the-tv-when-the-show-is-on viewers.  Which means 5 million subscribers who are paying actual money to see the show already.   I am completely sure that HBO is also seeing a rise in subscriptions, thanks to GoT.

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Ya it's their most watched show of all time domestically, and that's not even getting into the fact that it's INCREDIBLY popular overseas and brings in lots of money that way.

There's no way this thing gets less than 7 seasons at a minimum.

The real fun part is that starting next season we're really into uncharted territory for many of the storylines, so book-readers finally get to just enjoy watching the show and being surprised.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Dorkman wrote:

they need to do everything in the books exactly liek in the books except the parts i don't like they should do it the different way i want

/r/asoiaf is fucking insufferable this morning. I mean, I was whining on Twitter last night, but I can still acknowledge that there was a lot of great stuff in this episode. People are acting like the loss of "wherever whores go" and him crying after killing Shae is some betrayal of Tyrion's character, as if depression and melancholy won't be just as dramatically interesting as rage and frustration.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

286

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Trey wrote:

HBO basically owns their shows outright - unlike regular networks which have to renegotiate license deals with show producers every season.   So yeah, all that DVD and ancillary money pretty much goes straight into their bank account.

They even stopped letting Netflix carry their DVDs, reasoning that what few people now feel forced to buy them would give them more money than what little Netflix was paying. On the other end of the spectrum, they're putting huge chunks of the new John Oliver show on YouTube, as there is no re-run value to it and they need to drum up some buzz (it seems to be working).

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

287

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Dorkman wrote:

they need to do everything in the books exactly liek in the books except the parts i don't like they should do it the different way i want

Well, that's always true smile I've mentally adapted a number of books in my head, and often there are things the author did I would just ignore given the chance. The later Pern books, for example, retcon things so much I'd probably just ignore all the "prequels" and stick with what the first few books had.

I write stories! With words!
http://www.asstr.org/~Invid_Fan/

Thumbs up Thumbs down

288

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Doctor Submarine wrote:
Dorkman wrote:

they need to do everything in the books exactly liek in the books except the parts i don't like they should do it the different way i want

/r/asoiaf is fucking insufferable this morning. I mean, I was whining on Twitter last night, but I can still acknowledge that there was a lot of great stuff in this episode. People are acting like the loss of "wherever whores go" and him crying after killing Shae is some betrayal of Tyrion's character, as if depression and melancholy won't be just as dramatically interesting as rage and frustration.

The incident with Tysha was Tywin's one irredeemable and unjustifiable act. He's always acted coldly and without remorse but he never exploited an innocent life to make a petty and cruel point to someone. Tyrion killing Tywin because of what went down with Tysha, and everything that happened since, feels like more justified and natural penance.

Also, Tyrion's rage and depression about being fucked over his whole life by Tywin in that scene makes infinitely more sense if you include the stuff about Tysha. If you're having this big moment with Tyrion getting out his anger, omitting that tidbit doesn't make any sense. It would be akin to Walter White letting the stuff about Grey Matter subside; it's the entire crux of his bitterness. Changing Tyrion's motivation to Shae's betrayal doesn't work as well because the stuff with Tysha was the moment he realized his father would never love him.

Plus, "wherever whores go" is the perfect line to cause Tyrion to fully snap and shoot him.

That's why I wasn't fan of how things happened last night.

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

"Underwhelming" is decidedly the word that pops to my mind a lot lately with Game of Thrones, especially with this last episode.

I think they handled changes with major events from the books pretty well (the Brienne and Sandor thing was really cool) but the overall directing/screenplay feels duller and duller to me. Shae and Tywin's murders lacked impact, probably because of the dialogue. There was none with Shae, which I think was a mistake, and the Tywin scene kind of missed the point, as Ewing pointed out. Maybe they didn't need to use the Tysha story, but they really could have done better if using only Shae.

This particular chapter is among my favourites in the books, because it's a huge payoff to everything Tyrion has endured beforehand. The dialogue in the book makes it the last straw for Tyrion; the show makes it somewhat cold-blooded.

Don't get me wrong, it was still a good episode. But I was expecting it to be more than that.

Sébastien Fraud
Instagram |Facebook

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Ya, my biggest problem with game of thrones is how cookie-cutter and un-cinematic they play things at times. The creators have mentioned how they hate slow-motion and try to avoid it, and to me, despite a crazy impressive scope and VFX work, the execution of a lot of the episodes feels like someone just laying out plot beats onto the table, instead of film-makers executing a concrete vision. They seem to go out of their way to NOT make things dramatic (no slow-mo, no cross-cutting/montage, etc).

It's not really a fair complaint given most of it is probably for budget reasons, but it's hard, especially coming off something like True Detective, which feels like a 10 hour-long cohesive cinematic vision, whereas Game of Thrones feels squarely like a TV show most of the time.

Thumbs up +2 Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Michelle Maclaren's episodes have an ounce more flair to them, but Alex Graves is terribad.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

I'm rather firmly of the "slow motion is gross and lazy" school of thought and approve of its non-use in GoT.

I suppose slo-mo can have its place, but I think the majority of the times it's used these days are unnecessary. The lack of artifice is what makes GoT interesting as a fantasy story, IMO, just as the juxtaposition of the fantastic and stylized made True Detective more interesting than it probably had a reason to be.

Last edited by Dorkman (2014-06-18 02:34:56)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Dorkman wrote:

The lack of artifice is what makes GoT interesting as a fantasy story, IMO, just as the juxtaposition of the fantastic and stylized made True Detective more interesting than it probably had a reason to be.

This is a great point, but the show often tries to chase these big "cinematic" ideas (on a filmmaking level) even though the story is all about this very "realistic" treatment of the fantasy setting. For instance, the Hound/Brienne fight would have been more comprehensible without the rapid-fire cutting and the occasional arbitrary switching to striking wide shots (ditto the Mountain/Viper) but it also would've been more affecting and interesting. Shit, let's see the Dogme-95 version of Game of Thrones.

"The Doctor is Submarining through our brains." --Teague

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

I guess I'm the opposite of Dorkman, I want to see filmmakers bringing their vision and technique to the party, I want stylization, I want personality. Just because more recently, people like Zac Snyder who have no idea how to use slow-motion properly have driven it into the ground, doesn't mean it's a bad or ugly technique inherently (just like any other technique, they're just tools to tell a story and build emotional engagement).

There's a reason Neil Marshal's 2 episodes feel like they have a pulse and energy to them, and it's not just because they happen to be battle episodes. He understands how to move the camera to build moments, and he also seems to be one of the only directors on the show who can film a sword-fight coherently.

I dunno, I love the show and I get why they've chosen this matter-of-fact stylistic approach (easier on the budget, try to ground the fantasy elements), but on the other hand, I can't help but wish I could see a guy like De Palma tackle the Red Wedding and dramatize the shit out of it.

Again, I'm more critical of it on this point than I'd normally be because True Detective and Fargo have raised the bar for TV direction in my opinion.

Perhaps as their budgets continue to increase they'll be freer to take more chances and be more dynamic with it going forward. The closing shot this season was certainly fantastic.

Last edited by bullet3 (2014-06-18 06:52:24)

Thumbs up Thumbs down

295

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

Shit, let's see the Dogme-95 version of Game of Thrones.

I don't know if I can handle that glory.

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

http://1.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com/56/67/e39b225f87a8fb76bca6b4706a886eb4.jpg

---------------------------------------------
I would never lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation.

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Michelle Fairley says no plans for Lady Stoneheart.

Nope, I'm sorry, I'm going full Jojenpaste on this one. I refuse to accept that they're cutting LSH after they went to all the trouble of setting up Thoros of Myr. I've decided she meant there were no plans to put her in S4, is just trying to throw us off the scent for later, and I will continue to believe that until the series finale airs without her.

FROM MY DEAD COLDHANDS

Thumbs up Thumbs down

298

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Yeah, it would be a huge surprise if she wasn't in.

Eddie Doty

Thumbs up Thumbs down

299

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Eddie wrote:

Yeah, it would be a huge surprise if she wasn't in.

That's the twist!
One of the few ways left to surprise book-readers is to just start removing crazy shit.

Disclaimer: if you dislike the tone of a post I make, re-read it in a North/East London accent until it sounds sufficiently playful smile

300

Re: A Song of Ice and Fire (BOOK READERS ONLY; MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD)

Finally, a chance for the non-GoT-readers to have their revenge. 

"You guys are gonna lose your sh*t when you see what doesn't happen in THIS episode!"