Re: What's your verdict on GRAVITY? (*SPOILERS* are likely)
In a time where everything is CGI, Evil Dead decided to go the old school route and use practical effects for like 98% of the material in the film. That deserves to be recognized.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Off Topic → What's your verdict on GRAVITY? (*SPOILERS* are likely)
In a time where everything is CGI, Evil Dead decided to go the old school route and use practical effects for like 98% of the material in the film. That deserves to be recognized.
Totally forgot about Elysium. That might get the Iron Man spot.
This is too amusing not to pass on. My sister and her hubby saw Gravity tonight, in 2D. Her verdict? It's boring, as nothing happens
Her exact description was, about 20 minutes in you're down to one character, and you know nothing can happen to them or the movie ends so there's zero suspense. The visuals also did nothing for her, as that's just what every movie looks like nowadays.
Obviously, it's just not her kind of film
She likes plot, and is more a destination than the journey type of person.
I agree with the general awe and the specific bafflement over the Clooney Depature scene.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet (pardon if I just missed it in this thread) was how much horsing around Clooney was doing at the beginning. I really couldn't believe they had him just flying circles around the shuttle, putting them all in danger if he collided with something and wasting all that fuel, not to mention all the pointless jabber he was doing while the inexperienced Bullock was trying to accomplish the actual mission. And Faceless Astronat #3 wasn't much better.
I think it was meant (guy number three more than Clooney) to appeal to everyone's "god it'd be fun to be in space, floating around" instinct, before all hell breaks loose.
But yeah, as a matter of protocol, not so much.
That SNL sketch was followed up on with a "Weekend Update" joke that basically said that the most farfetched thing about the film was George Clooney spending that much time talking to a woman his own age.
Just saw it again.
The ISS is spinning. Gently, but clearly. So the centripetal force is pulling Clooney "out."
More importantly, from a character standpoint, it's crucial because it cements for Sandra how the counter momentum in zero-G works. Clooney un-tethering gives her just enough push to drift back towards the station. Then later at the end, when she's got the empty fire-extinguisher and is just out of reach of the hatch, she chucks it to give herself that extra boost and makes it. I love that moment so much.
I'm totally with Adam here. I get where the concern comes from, and I can see the argument being made (especially given the film's themes of motherhood and conception), but I think that in this case there's nothing more to be made of it.
And you can't make Stone a man anyway, because the whole movie hinges on uniquely female themes.
Although you can change the theme.
(haven't seen the film, and have no idea if it was a case of the writer getting to the end with a male and female character and going, "Oh, theme!", or if he started with a theme and wrote the characters)
My favorite shot in the whole movie was when Ryan was using the wrench to remove the parachute and little bits of debris would go screaming past in the background. The fact that there was no sound added so much to the building dread.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Off Topic → What's your verdict on GRAVITY? (*SPOILERS* are likely)
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.